Lil' Dice said:
Can't you just settle on agreeing to disagree?
Do you call people at work "dicks" wheneer you disagree with them?
If someone said the things that xexex has said in this thread to me in person, I'd at the very least call them an idiot right then and there. I only use "dick" for emphasis, since he can't see my disgusted expression.
If you must know.
For the record, I believe I've insulted (e.g., calling someone an "idiot", or a "dick") people perhaps 10-15 times on here over the course of 5+ years, yet I disagree with dozens of people every day. It's a particular
brand of idiocy-- the fatuous kind, smug in its foolishness-- that really draws my ire. Sorry, but I'm not about to sit around while some clearly braindead poster lauds someone who,
whatever the supposed "justification", just shot two innocent men. When someone says something like this:
yeah, everyone in their nice cushy suburban houses should think a little harder before mouthing off about how bad this kid was
...which
clearly implies that the perpetrator is not "bad" (or at the very least that the rest of us sitting in "judgment" are "just as bad" as he is, and thus shouldn't throw stones), despite the fact that he just murdered
two innocent people, I'm inclined to draw some unflattering conclusions about that person. Saying in the initial posts that you "almost admire" this criminal only solidifies my opinion. I apologize if this upsets you, but that's the way it works.
The fact that even a cursory examination of the situation (assuming we accept all of xexex's propositions- e.g., that this man was distraught, didn't want to return, saw "no way out" etc.) quite easily reveals that a more morally acceptable course of action would have been to just serve out his prison term illustrates that he has not even
considered the moral implications of this act or the other possible courses of action this man could have taken. What was the point of murdering the two officers? If you want to make the case that war messes with people's heads, then that's fine-- I agree. But unless we hold that he had a legitimate mental illness (possibly something like acute Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), then he is fully responsible for his actions; further, even if he
was suffering from something of the sort, this does
not mean that you have to praise him as some sort of martyr and express such repugnant callousness regarding the deaths of the officers. One does not follow from the other-- at least not in a rational person's mind.
It was not my place to try to "set him straight", since others have tried to do so throughout the thread to no avail. All I wanted to do was to let him know that that's what he was being: a dick. If he cares enough to, he'll examine precisely
why people jumped on him in this thread (hint: it's not because
we're "dicks") rather than continuing to hold to such ill-considered and frankly indefensible beliefs. It was the
persistence of his idiocy that forced my hand, so to speak.
Again, my apologies if I offended you in any way, but I call it as I see it. If a cop (or any innocent person, for that matter) had just been shot and someone walked up to me and told me that they "almost admired" the shooter just because he had a hard life, then-- unless the cop had previously killed the guy's mother or some such-- I'd call them a "dick", sure. Why not?
These are not the musings of a sensible man:
xexex said:
MARINE: I'M NOT GOING BACK TO IRAQ.
SOCIETY: YOU HAVE TO
MARINE: OVER MY DEAD BODY!
Over "my" dead body? Or over
everyone's dead bodies? If it means that much to you, fine, kill yourself-- at least you'll have some honor. What he's stating is equivalent to advocating that every person who has a legitimate grievance with the government go around shooting up their fellow citizens "just to prove a point". Yeah, you sure showed them, man! <rolleyes>
His particular grievance-- having been subjected to the horrors of war and all-- carries more weight, but not enough to get past the logical and moral objections to such an act.
I hope you can understand. I won't "agree to disagree" here, nor should anyone else. Anyone who condones this sort of thing on
any level-- and that includes yourself if that's how you feel-- is beyond help, your "snowflake" rationale notwithstanding.