Martinez's 1999 season was incredible, but his 2000 campaign was unreal. Easily the better of the two. Only reason he didn't top 20 wins again was because his offense was held scoreless in quite a few of his starts. The one-hitter against Tampa is the best pitching performance I have ever watched.
Big Mario fan, but I'm going to have to go with Tiger Woods in the year 2000.
However Michael Jordans 87-88 season could compete with it.
Also Babe Ruth accomplished some insane feats. In 1920 he hit more HRs as an individual than all but 1 team in MLB.
[Messi's career.
I'm not going to speak for other sports, but just in hockey, Bobby Orr had a few seasons that were better. He's overlooked because he doesn't really hold any records anymore, but nobody dominated like he did all over the ice.
Did Tiger Woods contract cancer in 2000 and beat it and then go on to have the year he did?
Did Jordan get cancer in the middle of his 87-88 season? Then no he couldn't.
Babe Ruth didn't get cancer in 1920 though did he? Although I will say that's pretty amazing and they only played 142 games and still hit 60.
Messi never got cancer in the middle of any of his seasons.
Unless you know who he is, you won't know how to pronounce his name. That's why.
Babe Ruth didn't get cancer in 1920 though did he? Although I will say that's pretty amazing and they only played 142 games and still hit 60.
Or have a grade school level understanding of phonetics.
It's really an either or sort of thing .
Unless you know who he is, you won't know how to pronounce his name. That's why.
So basically to have an argument against you, an athlete will have to have cancer in the middle of a season? We don't even have to continue the thread if this is going to be a response every single time.
Note to Pens-age: Mario Lemieux is a player who played for your team.
Martinez's 1999 season was incredible, but his 2000 campaign was unreal. Easily the better of the two. Only reason he didn't top 20 wins again was because his offense was held scoreless in quite a few of his starts. The one-hitter against Tampa is the best pitching performance I have ever watched.
Yes. That's the crux of my argument. Beating cancer in the middle of a season AND THEN having one of the all time great seasons (cancer or not) is the main reason why I believe that the Lemieux 1992-93 season is so amazing.
Anyone who has ever seen what chemotherapy does to a person knows what I'm talking about when I say how draining it can be. You can lose your appetite and lose a ton of weight, you lose all your energy. It looks like you are gradually wasting away. So for a person to go through three months of chemotherapy and then to come back (the day after his last treatment to boot) and play a physically intensive sport at such an elite level that he was recognized as the best player for that year it's quite literally unbelievable. See, a lot of people are throwing out names of athletes who were perfectly healthy during their great seasons. Even in Adrian Peterson's case, it was after a rehab period of several months (still amazing).
Lemieux's recovery time period from the diagnosis of his cancer to his last radiation treatment: ONE DAY.
And I can't stress this point enough - he still won the scoring title and led his team to 17 straight victories.
80s and early 90s were truly great era for Hockey. Why did hockey's popularity decline in US anyway? Hockey even had it's Hollywood boom, we had movies from Slap Shot to Mighty Ducks.yeah he was super but he wasnt alone in his era especially in the 80's and 90's there were a lot of all stars on teams. If he was out now i would agree but in his day there were like 5 elite teams, and a gang of really good teams. So...that would be why he isnt so alone at the top, the league was stacked.
Colorado, Detroit, NJ, Dallas alone had a shit ton of all stars, they were 3 line deep teams. Detroit alone had an all star russian line, and on top of that Yzerman *best captain ever* and crap tons more. Colorado was the same way with Foresberg and Sackic and a crap ton of all stars, NJ didnt give two shits about how much skill you had they beat your face and out hustled you. Super Mario was a super star and champion during an era of elite deep teams.
NJ , DET, DAL, and COL won like 10 straight championships, and before he won his 2, edmonton and the islanders dominated the 80s i think they won..8 of them overall.
He's great but he's not going to pull fans from their teams like Jordan could , hockey is still a sport where the team gets the glory more so than the player.
Lockouts killed the momentum.80s and early 90s were truly great era for Hockey. Why did hockey's popularity decline in US anyway? Hockey even had it's Hollywood boom, we had movies from Slap Shot to Mighty Ducks.
2000 was definitely the more impressive year. #1 all-time single season WHIP at .737, in the American League. Next best season among those facing designated hitters is Justin Verlander in 50th place with .920. Pedro was head and shoulders above any pitchers of his era.
80s and early 90s were truly great era for Hockey. Why did hockey's popularity decline in US anyway? Hockey even had it's Hollywood boom, we had movies from Slap Shot to Mighty Ducks.
Well, then we're pretty much done here. Guy is amazing and superhuman for what he did, but there is no other athlete out there in that situation, so nothing can be said.
You should have just made this a Lemieux appreciation thread.
That's exactly what it is. It's Lemieux appreciation thread.
Why? Because that one season is so criminally ignored - even amongst hockey fans. There are hockey fans out there who put Gretzky's four 200 point years as the best seasons ever without even giving this one an honourable mention. ESPN was a couple of steps from having Erin Andrews have sex with Adrian Peterson for his amazing season but the Mario Lemieux season hasn't even gotten a 30 for 30. Ridiculous.
It's like if I saved the universe from The Big Crunch, cured cancer, gave human beings the formula for immortality and invented faster than light travel didn't end up getting nominated for the World's Greatest Human Being Ever prize.
See, some things are so great that the only reasonable thing to do is admire them in one giant circlejerk. Mario Lemieux's 1992-93 season is one of those things.
Radiation therapy is not chemotherapy.
He missed games. Players miss games due to injury all the time. The reason doesn't invalidate everything else.
He also had a serious health issue at a young age.
Also Babe Ruth accomplished some insane feats. In 1920 he hit more HRs as an individual than all but 1 team in MLB.
That maybe correct but if it's a mistake it's due to my ignorance of the difference in meaning between the two words. Lemieux did indeed go through chemotherapy.
I think cancer is quite a bit different from a pulled groin or even a serious injury like a torn ACL. I actually think you're diminishing his accomplishments by grouping pass off cancer and chemo as regular sports injuries and treatments. I'm not saying that Jordan or Gretzky's best seasons were shit, they were AMAZING.
I'm just saying that Lemieux's was that much better.
But can he jump?
Note to Pens-age: Mario Lemieux is a player who played for your team.
Note to Pens-age: Mario Lemieux is a player who played for your team.
- He missed 24 games due to injury - that's slightly under 1/3rr of an NHL season, and won the scoring title. That's like winning the home run race in baseball while only playing 117 of 163 games.
Martinez's 1999 season was incredible, but his 2000 campaign was unreal. Easily the better of the two. Only reason he didn't top 20 wins again was because his offense was held scoreless in quite a few of his starts. The one-hitter against Tampa is the best pitching performance I have ever watched.
Lemieux didn't really "get hot" for the season.
He was just HOT in general. Period.
All. The. Time.
Statistcally? It's Wilt Chamberlains 62-63 season.
50.4 PPG, 25.7 RPG, 48.5 MPG.
and 3 GPN (girls per night)