Toons
Member
1. Refusing to renegotiate a contract is not reneging on it.
You're own screenshot lays it pretty bare. The contract was made under the guise this would be a theatrical only release. Well before pandemic happened. Ergo Disney essentially introduced a new clause by deciding to release it on its own platform which, as it was worded, cannibalized the profits from BO revenue. This would be true regardless of how much money the film made, because a portion of that money was coming from a source that was not agreed upon by both parties. When you have contracts you can't just introduce your own terms in the middle of the process, a contract is an agreement on terms and conditions. Those conditions were altered by Disney releasing the film outside of theater only.2. She is entitled to a portion of the box office backend. Not to the films earnings. She is not entitled to any movie from Disney+. This is in the lawsuit.
If the film did endgame numbers, than her lawsuit would have weaker standing, as her case is built on Disney causing her financial harm.
3. The film has a 200 million dollar budget without factoring in marketing. Assuming production budget * 2(though it should be higher since Black Widow went through 2 separate marketing campaigns) = breakeven, than Black widow is not profitable.
That's assuming a lot. And not to mention it will still likely see release in other international outlets. The jury is very much still out, and regardless of this it is the highest grossing film domestically of the year so far, and its domestic cume has surpassed even the second captain america movie during a pandemic. They'll be fine regardless.