There's a good thread about it there.
I wanna know how we can test the effectiveness of social distancing vs not doing it? Where is your peer reviewed study with a control group.
I know a lot of you wrtire zerohedge off but i found this very interesting.
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
I think it's time for everyone outside of East Asia to just admit that this once in a century pandemic took them all by surprise, instead if trying to score points like this. BTW, the NYT looks as bad as The Guardian in terms of hypocrisy.
I think it's time for everyone outside of East Asia to just admit that this once in a century pandemic took them all by surprise, instead if trying to score points like this. BTW, the NYT looks as bad as The Guardian in terms of hypocrisy.
Can anyone explain the mistrust some have for Fauci? Is it just cause he's worked in his field so long and for so many presidents?
I think it's time for everyone outside of East Asia to just admit that this once in a century pandemic took them all by surprise, instead if trying to score points like this. BTW, the NYT looks as bad as The Guardian in terms of hypocrisy.
Can anyone explain the mistrust some have for Fauci? Is it just cause he's worked in his field so long and for so many presidents?
I wanna know how we can test the effectiveness of social distancing vs not doing it? Where is your peer reviewed study with a control group.
Incidentally, interesting to see the herd immunity model looking like a good option. The UK government was slaughtered by everyone for suggesting such a thing a month ago...
Yeah, I've seen this, too. It looks scary in graph form like that, but it's also important to note that Sweden hasn't sacrificed their society to combat this thing. Their argument is that they will see more deaths up front, but will be able to mostly operate as normal. Meanwhile, other countries will see a flatter, but much longer curve that ultimately ends up in roughly the same amount of deaths.
Only time will tell what the truth is.
I remember when some of the governors said even with the lockdown we would get 80%-100% infected with this. But I was ok with the lockdown were it premised on the fact that we didn't want to break the hospital system. I really was. But the idea that we were going to break the hospital system was based on terrible models that just didn't pan out.
so until yesterday i never bothered looking at international stats. look at that absurd death rate in China. no wonder people don't trust these numbers.
![]()
In my state you aren't allowed to drive at midnight. You get a fine. Same goes for leaving the house without a mask. (this is ok)Left the house today for the first time in April (not counting daily Rottie walks). I figured I'd take advantage of gas prices ($1.49 for 91 Octane) and midnight seemed like an appropriately safe time. I know it's late but are the roads ever empty.
Can anyone explain the mistrust some have for Fauci? Is it just cause he's worked in his field so long and for so many presidents?
New Zealand seem to be the winners in this whole saga. Yeah it is a low population country, but they locked down tight and tested and traced and it has worked. It helps when you have capable leadership. Go figure.
Such a simplistic comparison.
Isolated, low population density countries like NZ will never suffer to the same degree as places like high population density areas like Europe & the rest.
There is nothing to learn from places like that which have any relevance, whatsoever.
Hardly any cases and they locked down straight away. Notice the difference in approach?
oh, and comparing death totals across countries with different population density, customs, counting metrics, testing metrics, and whatnot is a silly comparison to begin with.
> pandemic
>virus spreads at a furious rate
>healthcare systems across the world are completely overwhelmed
>worldwide disruption on a scale not seen in generations
>"free muh common sense"
![]()
>mfw
Only when you don't like what the stats show you I guess.
population density of New Zealand 18 per km-squared 12 deaths
population density of Colorado 20 per km-squared 411 deaths
He added: "Perhaps SARS-CoV-2 can be spread through the power of parping – we need more evidence. "
This virus is very serious, but the hyperbole isn't doing anyone any good. There's absolutely no logical reason for those kind of far off projections being made right now. All it does is scare people. No one can predict anything in 2022, it's absurd. That has to stop.
"Hundreds" is not a large crowd, on the other hand, and likely exactly because number of dumbfucks is rather low.Some people simply deserve to die and I don't think this shit can happen anywhere in the world, but in USA things are obviously different:
Link
Time to bring sticks to beat them like in India.
![]()
This doesn't make any sense. You are angry that the lockdown has eased pressure on the hospitals and they aren't struggling to cope? That was the idea behind locking down in the first place. Don't be annoyed it worked.
Dude, one of them is literally surrounded by water.
You can go back and see Cuomo hyping up the "worst week ever" 2 or 3 weeks ago. The models turned out to be totally and completely wrong.
Update on my dad's illness:
He says breathing remains ok, but he is in chronic pain.
I'm also going to stay in my room now. Not worth taking anymore risks unless I really have to.
It must take a certain amount of sociopathy to be able to accuse someone else of downplaying something (to the point of causing the death of other people) when you yourself had already downplayed it, and then to accept plaudits like this
"Later, avian flu strain A/H5N1, 'even in the best-case scenarios' was to 'cause 2 (million) to 7 million deaths' worldwide. A British professor named Neil Ferguson scaled that up to 200 million. It killed 440. This same Ferguson in 2002 had projected 50-50,000 deaths from so-called 'Mad Cow Disease'. But the final toll was slightly over 200. In the current crisis the most alarming model, nay probably the most influential in the implementation of the draconian quarantines worldwide, projected a maximum of 2.2 million American deaths and 550,000 United Kingdom deaths unless there were severe restrictions for 18 months or until a vaccine was developed. The primary author: Neil Ferguson."
"The only 'model"'with any success is actually quite accomplished and appeared in 1840, when a 'computer' was an abacus. It's called Farr's Law, and is actually more of an observation that epidemics grow fastest at first and then slow to a peak, then decline in a more-or-less symmetrical pattern. As you might guess from the date, it precedes public health services and doesn't require lockdowns or really any interventions at all. Rather, the disease grabs the low-hanging fruit (with COVID-19 that's the elderly with co-morbid conditions) and finds it progressively harder to get more fruit."