PinkCrayon
Member
and why does that guy have a bellybutton on his back???
and why does that guy have a bellybutton on his back???
A victim of Cerberus experiments.
I would love to know how such an experiment would advance humanity.
What is Matthew chapter five verse eight?
I thought you meant the whole tattoo when I first glanced at the thread. :lolA victim of Cerberus experiments.
What is Matthew chapter five verse eight?
LttP - Marauder Shields was a hero. I should have let him put a bullet in my head.
I know it's bible stuff; I just didn't know what it meant. I wonder if he had that before he put the ME-inspired tattoo.Bible stuff.
Long story short:
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.
Totally appropriate for Mass Effect and not pretentious at all.
You know you would. Just look at those lips.He/She will never know the touch of a woman/man.
The indoctrination theory is just proof of how devoted Bioware's fanbase really is. The fans literally crafted an over the top theory just to make Bioware's writers look better. It's sad that those very same fans are called "entitled" as well by the gaming press.
I'm actually surprised that the prevailing opinion in this thread is to dismiss the Indoctrination Theory as nonsense born of fan desperation. Watch the video.
The hardest thing to achieve in the game is the two second scene which shows Shepard breathing. The Citadel just blew up, and the 'Destroy' option is supposed to kill Shepard anyway, if the space-god's word is to be taken at face value. So let's say the game's ending is exactly as it appears, and is just terrible. Why include this scene that shows Shepard didn't die when the player picks the 'Destroy' option? Where is Shepard's body, and how did it get there? Why is it available to only the most committed of players?
It's impossible to explain in the context of the narrative as it stands. It only makes any sense as a teaser to show that Shepard is still laying in the rubble of London, coming out of a dream sequence induced by Reaper indoctrination, and about to get the fuck up and finish the fight.
- Bioware has specifically stated that people on the Citadel might have survived, so it can't have blown up entirely.
- There's nothing about that scene that says it's in London. The pipe you shoot collapses over where Shepard was standing in the cut scene that moves away from the room.
Even if the indoc theory was true, that would just make the ending worse. You end a 100 hour long trilogy with a dream sequence that isn't even confirmed to be true? Get the fuck out of here.
Let's say that when the Citadel blows up at the end of the game, sections of it seal off, including the one in which Shepard was standing. That still doesn't explain why Shepard is still alive in the extra scene. Shepard is partially synthetic, and the space-god specifically said that Shepard would be destroyed along with all synthetic life the player chose Destroy. Either the space-god was wrong, or he was lying. If he is what he appears, he has no reason to lie; and the entire premise of the ending as it stands is based on the truth and accuracy of everything he says - so why is Shepard still alive?
Aske said:The additional ending DLC was planned before the game's release. It's not a result of Bioware giving in to fans; rather it has always been their intention to present players with a delay before revealing the real ending.
ending press release said:An official press release went out today announcing how we are re-prioritizing the Mass Effect 3 post release content schedule to provide a more fleshed out experience for our fans.
The additional ending DLC was planned before the game's release. It's not a result of Bioware giving in to fans; rather it has always been their intention to present players with a delay before revealing the real ending.
Even if the indoc theory was true, that would just make the ending worse. You end a 100 hour long trilogy with a dream sequence that isn't even confirmed to be true? Get the fuck out of here.
Confirmation bias.
Because BioWare are bad writers.
Do you really think if there was a "true ending" planned from the beginning that they would wait 5-6 months to release it? It would've been out at the end of April at the latest!Fair point to say that I can't prove that the DLC was pre-planned. I think once it's out, we'll know if it was a hastily created apology or something Bioware had long planned to release in this way.
It'll be interesting to see what happens when the DLC eventually releases. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong; but the arguments in the video make too much sense for me to ignore. If you guys don't buy them, so be it. There's nothing more I can add.
I maintain that the indoctrination theory is less improbable than the ending as it stands.
No, they didn't plan it before release. Besides the obvious, (folding to fan pressure) that is simply NOT how video games are made.
I know it sucks. I know you are looking for anything to comfort your sorrow. I've been there, just take a step back and think for a minute. They fucked up. They tried to make what should have been one of the greatest games ever in 18 months, as opposed to the 2-3 years they needed. The ending is simply a product of a rushed development cycle. Nothing more.
"Hey this doesn't make sense. And that doesn't make sense.
You know why? Because Shepard is indoctrinated and it's a dream."
So STUPID
No, they didn't plan it before release. Besides the obvious, (folding to fan pressure) that is simply NOT how video games are made.
I know it sucks. I know you are looking for anything to comfort your sorrow. I've been there, just take a step back and think for a minute. They fucked up. They tried to make what should have been one of the greatest games ever in 18 months, as opposed to the 2-3 years they needed. The ending is simply a product of a rushed development cycle. Nothing more.
It's not confirmation bias when you go into the video expecting it to be far-fetched bullshit.
Confirmation bias (also called confirmatory bias, myside bias or verification bias) is a tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses.
The indoc theory is nullified by Patrick Weekes post and the Final Hours app.
It's born out of desperation for answers about the current endings. I really wish Bioware would come out and kill it. But, it's the only positive thing they have going since the release. Snuffing what little hope there is would probably damage the brand even further.
No, they didn't plan it before release. Besides the obvious, (folding to fan pressure) that is simply NOT how video games are made.
I know it sucks. I know you are looking for anything to comfort your sorrow. I've been there, just take a step back and think for a minute. They fucked up. They tried to make what should have been one of the greatest games ever in 18 months, as opposed to the 2-3 years they needed. The ending is simply a product of a rushed development cycle. Nothing more.
Getting singed by Harbinger did have a dream-like quality to it, but you're just about dead because of it, too. That can go either way.I don't think it's that desperate, a friend of mine thought the ending was a dream when he played it and that was without looking up things on the internet.
Even if the indoc theory was true, that would just make the ending worse. You end a 100 hour long trilogy with a dream sequence that isn't even confirmed to be true? Get the fuck out of here.
Did someone say Indoctrination Theory?
People are saying that Bioware are geniuses for pulling it off which implies that it's a better ending. If were true, it would still be the shittiest ending of all time because it doesn't end the main plot. Shepard is still on Earth while everyone dies.Yea... noone argued it makes it better. It's still BS.
Yes. That's why I have returned. I can hear it from miles away.
He killed me. But I tried again...
No, Drew Karpyshyn is a pretty bad plotter in general. It's all over ME2 and ME3. The Ending is just when he tried to make the badness deep and provocative.Aske said:The bottom line: does this theory seem more or less likely than the idea that Bioware's writers would just go nuts and throw away everything they'd established over the course of the game in the final ten minutes?
Karpyshyn left a while ago and didn't do anything for ME3. You mean Walters? Hudson?No, Drew Karpyshyn is a pretty bad plotter in general. It's all over ME2 and ME3. The Ending is just when he tried to make the badness deep and provocative.
Karpyshyn left a while ago and didn't do anything for ME3. You mean Walters? Hudson?
I would really like to hear what Bioware had planned for the series finale, or if they just made it up as they went along.
Go replay ME2 and really pay attention this time. This whole series went off the rails storywise in the first few minutes of that game when they killed off and resurrected Shepard for no conceivable reason other than to force him to work for TIM/Cerberus. You remember Cerberus from ME, right? Somehow we're expected to believe that a small group of former Alliance black-ops goofballs transform into a near galactic superpower with seemingly unlimited funding and a private army. It's beyond wretched how incompetent Mac Walters is at crafting a coherent narrative.
I got it from the CE. Can you post the cover art?I'm probably late to the party, but the ME3 soundtrack is now on iTunes. Yay.