Mastercard: Clarifying recent headlines on gaming content

8fNVuwlR8asza9ji.jpeg
Source on this image
 
do they think we're an idiot or something? the main problem is that its not illegal in the first place. Incest between 2 jpeg on fictional media is not Illegal.
Certainly not in the US, fiction is fiction there. I know places like Canada do not believe fiction is fiction and do explicitly disallow some types of fictional content
 
Depictions of what would be illegal in real life in porn are generally considered illegal and obscene in the US.

Same with even fantasy IRL porn, hence the endless use of "step-" relatives and not real relatives. Or generic "teen" instead of having an adult actress just claim they are underage.

Just because nobody is currently going out of their way to police something and arrest people doesn't mean it isn't illegal. All the more legit porn sites scrubbed a ton of their material a couple years back because US lawmakers threatened them.
Not really. For example last year in Indiana there was a case where a guy was charged for having hentai featuring underage characters, but was found not guilty as it is protected by the first amendment (https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/in-court-of-appeals/116613118.html)
I think it depends on how realistic it looks though. Kind of a grey area.
And I am pretty sure stuff like fictional incest would never be a legal issue (in the US at least). After all, the laws on incest are about having sex with your own immediate family member, not on you seeing other (fictional) family members getting it on.
The reason underage stuff gets targetted is because child pornography itself is obviously illegal, so the question is whether fictional versions of that are ok or not (and depends heavily on country). I'm pretty sure Steam already doesn't allow that stuff? Though there could be stuff that is questionable, I dunno.

From my understanding, the reason there is so much "step" stuff in porn games, is because places like Patreon specifically forbid it, not because of legal reasons.
 
First, before we continue, we just have to clear one thing up: we didn't do this.

Now that that's out of the way, side note: we did it
 
Top Bottom