Support NeoGAF

[DefectiveReject]

Why do Nintendo even have investors???
They make extreme amounts of money and are extremely cash rich. They also end up paying investors each year for fuck all.

 

[charlequin]

I have a feeling we see DQ7r on Wii and an enhanced port of DQ8 before DQ10 comes out.

There won't be an "enhanced port" of a DQ game before it's been remade, ever. But DQ7r would be likely for Wii, yes.

Why do Nintendo even have investors???

Because... they're a publically traded company?

 

[cw_sasuke]

At this point they need to put out some DQ Games on the Wii if they want DQX to be a success - DQS 2 and DQ7R should be a given in the next 2 years, even if it would be easier to port dq7 just on the ds and sell at least a million copies of it...

 

[HK-47]

Why do Nintendo even have investors???
They make extreme amounts of money and are extremely cash rich. They also end up paying investors each year for fuck all.

Should I quote your tag?

 

[HK-47]

At this point they need to put out some DQ Games on the Wii if they want DQX to be a success - DQS 2 and DQ7R should be a given in the next 2 years, even if it would be easier to port dq7 just on the ds and sell at least a million copies of it...

Who needs the DQ remakes more though? Nintendo or Square?

 

[donny2112]

Who needs the DQ remakes more though? Nintendo or Square?

Trick question! It's Enix. What do I win?

Edit:
Enix doesn't need DQ remakes on Wii, but with DQX coming to the console and a severe lack of pre-existing RPGs on the system, it would behoove them to put at least one on the console. After all, Enix was always the smarter side of the company.

 

[JoshuaJSlone]

Enix doesn't need DQ remakes on Wii, but with DQX coming to the console and a severe lack of pre-existing RPGs on the system, it would behoove them to put at least one on the console.

Basically. I mean, if the counterargument is that it would just be better to put VII and any spinoffs on DS, the same goes for X.