Eteric Rice said:
A lot of the people who buy FF and Tales games are of the otaku type. They usually own multiple consoles. Given a choice between the two, which do you think they would pick?
NeonZ said:
Do you really think that the audience of Tales and Final Fantasy are that different?
My point was that there are (at least) 5 million Wii owners who do not own a PS3. Sure, you can take
Eteric Rice's tack that "well, all the
Tales fans who own a Wii also probably own a PS3". But that's the equivalent of saying that
Graces has no appeal to any of the 5 million folks who only own a Wii. That seems to me to be a more cogent reason for underperformance than the release of another game in the genre, no matter how massive.
Besides, if we try to guess the mentality of consumers that game can be played the other direction too. To wit: Most
Tales fans are otaku type, which means they're savvy about the discounting protocols of retailers.
FF XIII was extremely expensive at launch. PS3-only otaku had no other RPG choices, so they were boned. But the guys with PS3 and Wii could buy
Graces, beat it in three weeks, and then get
FF XIII for cheap. Voila!
Because there's definitely some overlap in the fanbases, my saying that
XIII had "nothing" to do with
Graces' performance is perhaps too strong. But to say that it was the primary reason for it--which
Eteric Rice implied--is too extreme a converse.