Mr. Giggles
Member
Man, when that oil runs out I wonder if this will be tolerated
Man, when that oil runs out I wonder if this will be tolerated
The west only cares because they have oil. Our economy depends on it. If the place out comes from is a prison from its citizens the west don't care.
Token comments to tick the tut tut box to show back home were doing something.
Hurry up hydrogen and nuclear fusion. We need to get clean and cut our ties to oil.
Oh and we need to look at all our western oil companies who lobby and stymie any advances so they can keep the power and money their way.
Is it normal for two grown men to hold hands like that in that part of the world?Personally I say we crucify and behead Shuggananas.
Geez, guys.
ANYWAY, this is awful. It's still strange to me that Saudi Arabia are our "allies" when they are still a society that pulls this stuff.
"I get it, King Abdullah -- sometimes you just gotta torture people!"
Edit: My own post inspired me to learn more about that. Good article here for the curious:
Why the U.S. is Stuck With Saudi Arabia
Spoiler alert:It's oil, basically.
What is this the middle ages?
Get with the times Saudi Arabia and start using drones like other civilized nations.
Is it normal for two grown men to hold hands like that in that part of the world?
Yeah, death penalty is still in effect in uncivilized countries, news at 11
I was not trying to be funny ?
The what about ism is strong with this one.
Yes it is. You can hold hands with a man but it is illegal to hold hands with a woman. I learned this the other day in the thread about the Iranian woman who was charged with illegitimate sexual relationship short of adultery for shaking hands with her lawyer.
Is it normal for two grown men to hold hands like that in that part of the world?
Really? Was he banned for this?
I'm not defending Saudi Arabia.
I'm just pissed off at the attitude some people have. Pretending it's some medieval shit that only happens in backwards areas. it's no less barbaric than being killed with a drone. people should call it what it is, just modern human terribleness.
I'm not defending Saudi Arabia.
I'm just pissed off at the attitude some people have. Pretending it's some medieval shit that only happens in backwards areas. it's no less barbaric than being killed with a drone. people should call it what it is, just modern human terribleness.
I'm not defending Saudi Arabia.
I'm just pissed off at the attitude some people have. Pretending it's some medieval shit that only happens in backwards areas. it's no less barbaric than being killed with a drone. people should call it what it is, just modern human terribleness.
First off, I'm totally against this sentence and find it appalling and inhumane. However I don't believe there is any intent to carry it out. Our rulers generally aren't in the habit of executing their political opponents. What they do have a habit of though, is using family to pressure them. That's what's happening here. They want a public confession from Nimr al-Nimr, most importantly one that implicates Iran and Hezbullah.
Another thing, please don't mischaracterize al-Nimr and his followers as peaceful activists. They are sectarian, extremist and militant and are widely suspected of trying to form an armed militia. They are to the Shia what the Salafi extremists are to the Sunnah, and many in the shia community in Saudi cannot stand them and argue loudly that they don't represent them. If you want a genuine peaceful Shia activist to get behind try someone like Dr Tawfiq al-Saif: this is him owning a debate on the Shia and citizen rights
A brief translation: He argues for equal rights, freedom of expression, and an elected executive
First off, I'm totally against this sentence and find it appalling and inhumane. However I don't believe there is any intent to carry it out. Our rulers generally aren't in the habit of executing their political opponents. What they do have a habit of though, is using family to pressure them. That's what's happening here. They want a public confession from Nimr al-Nimr, most importantly one that implicates Iran and Hezbullah.
Another thing, please don't mischaracterize al-Nimr and his followers as peaceful activists. They are sectarian, extremist and militant and are widely suspected of trying to form an armed militia. They are to the Shia what the Salafi extremists are to the Sunnah, and many in the shia community in Saudi cannot stand them and argue loudly that they don't represent them. If you want a genuine peaceful Shia activist to get behind try someone like Dr Tawfiq al-Saif: this is him owning a debate on the Shia and citizen rights
A brief translation: He argues for equal rights, freedom of expression, and an elected executive
Kinda got sad reading this, as I was reminded again we really have a fucked up world. We'll out bad guys as bad guys so long as they don't scratch our back.
And that's considering that scratching is part of a worldly problem.
The power of mere ideas is strong.
No, it is not illegal to hold hands with one's wife, sister, daughter, niece, or mother in Saudi Arabia.
They where establishing a Hezboloah like terrorist group and establishing a terrorist militia means death in Saudi Arabia,
Even Kuwait that is tolerant towards Shia was surprised to find an armed Hezboloah militia being set with a help of an Iranian diplomat.
After The Arabic Spring aka the middle east black death don't be surprised to see even less tolerance toward any religious militia from GCC countries.
Lol no, as a Shia Sheikh Nimr is the leader of the protest movement, as if any single Shia can stand the regime. What a sad attempt to sully the image of one the community heroes and justify the regime. Every human rights organization has condemned what is happening to Nimr and the Shia in Bahrain and KSA.
Tell me, how many men has Nimr beheaded? Or simply killed? None.
People justify the right for the Sunni to revolt against dictators but damn the Shia when they do, like when they did in 1991 against Saddam Hussein, where was the Arab nation then?
As a side note, being beheaded would be seen as a honor by many of us, they sought to live like Imam Hussein and now they will die like Imam Hussein, beheaded at the hands of tyrants.
First of Nimr al-Nimr isn't the leader of anything and doesn't speak for anyone. The Shia community isn't this homogeneous monolithic entity, people have differing views and political directions. You want progressive activists look at the likes of Tawfiq al-Saif, you want the mainstream religious go for Hassan al-Saffar etc.. Nimr al-Nimr is of the radical fringe and his support base is minimal. There's a reason he's limited to his tiny base of Awwamiyah. No support in the rest of Qatif let alone Ahsa and beyond.
Giving a voice to extremists such as al-Nimr does a disservice to the many who have campaigned hard for their rights and for political reform. They have done nothing but sabotage their hard work and paint their wider community unjustly as violent militants.
They where establishing a Hezboloah like terrorist group and establishing a terrorist militia means death in Saudi Arabia,
Even Kuwait that is tolerant towards Shia was surprised to find an armed Hezboloah militia being set with a help of an Iranian diplomat.
After The Arabic Spring aka the middle east black death don't be surprised to see even less tolerance toward any religious militia from GCC countries.
I'm not defending Saudi Arabia.
I'm just pissed off at the attitude some people have. Pretending it's some medieval shit that only happens in backwards areas. it's no less barbaric than being killed with a drone. people should call it what it is, just modern human terribleness.
Shuggananas got taken out for saying something I agree with?
This is disgusting, but not surprising. It would be amazing if every country lived by a more civilized standard, but that's not possible right now. Cross my fingers for the future.
What's the point of saying that it's not surprising though? Like what does that even mean? It's not necessarily surprising, but that doesn't make it any less fucked up. It's just a weird thing to say about this situation, and really dismissive.
What's the point in coming in here and saying "Oh this is terrible"?
There's not really a point to either...
There is a point to it, because one response is sympathetic, and the other is not. I certainly hope no one would ever say to someone who is going to be beheaded and crucified, "News at 11."
Regarding his popularity.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/08/us-saudi-arrest-idUSBRE8670GH20120708
"American diplomats who met Nimr in August 2008 described him as a second-tier figure in Saudi Shi'ite politics, but one who was growing in popularity,"
"An activist in Awamiya said he had witnessed a protest march of thousands of people and that he had seen 20 injured in a clash with riot police."
http://fpif.org/death-sentence-inflame-sectarian-tensions-across-middle-east/
Regarding his "radicalism" :
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...-sentence-against-shi-cleric-must-be-quashed/
"Evidence for all the other charges he was convicted of came from religious sermons and interviews attributed to the cleric. Amnesty Internationals review of these texts confirms that he was exercising his right to free expression and was not inciting violence. Some of the charges, such as disobeying the ruler, should not be offences as they criminalize the right to freedom of expression. Other charges are vague and have been used simply to punish him for his peaceful activities.
If him being weary and tired of the status quo and chose to take action makes him a radical then so be it. He is as much a radical as Gandhi was, taking up peaceful protests against the regime.
He's set to be beheaded and crucified tomorrow unless some miracle happens.
Absolutely disgusting.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-...arabia-for-death-sentencing-protester/6811576Last week Saudi Arabia was chosen to lead a United Nations Human Right's Council.
The decision was questioned by human rights groups, but the US State Department welcomed the news that one of its key allies had been chosen for the job.
"I mean, we've talked about our concerns about some of the capital punishment cases in Saudi Arabia in our human rights report, but I don't have any more to add to it," deputy spokesman Mark Toner said.
Mr Toner said he welcomed Saudi Arabia heading the council.
"Again, I don't have any comment, don't have any reaction to it. I mean, frankly, it's ... we would welcome it. We're close allies," he said.
He said he could not say "off the top of my head" whether Saudi Arabia got into the human rights report annually.