Metacritic publisher of the year award goes to....

onesvenus

onesvenus

Member
... Microsoft, with an average metascore of 87.4

Sony, Humble bundle, Activision and Bethesda follow.
An interesting point is that no publisher had and average rating above 85 before.


What an amazing powerhouse Xbox will be once Activision and Blizzard are under the same umbrella

www.metacritic.com

Metacritic's 12th Annual Game Publisher Rankings

We reveal the past year's best and worst videogame publishers (based on their 2021 releases) in the 12th edition of our Game Publisher Rankings.
www.metacritic.com www.metacritic.com
 
Last edited:
Well the numbers don't lie, not just the best but an unprecedented performance:
It is very rare for a publisher to average above 80 for its releases across a single calendar year. But how often does a company average above 85 ? Never ... until this year.
Click to expand...
UzmjrGq.jpg


And that doesn't even include Bethesda apparently?
 
Last edited:
They link to the Xbox One version of Psychonauts 2 though, with 11 reviews averaging at a 91.

The main reviewed version of Psychonauts 2 however was the Series X version with an average score of 87, so that's a bit cheeky there.

Imo, it did deserve to be over 90 but whatever.
 
Last edited:
Markio128 said:
They've certainly kept the momentum going this year with Crossfire X.
Click to expand...
Are you talking about exclusives? Because CrossfireX was not published by Microsoft.
And talking about exclusives, there's a thing called Babylon's Fall that has almost the same critics rating but much lower user rating than that.

And now, please, stop trolling
 
fatmarco said:
They link to the Xbox One version of Psychonauts 2 though, with 11 reviews averaging at a 91.

The main reviewed version of Psychonauts 2 however was the Series X version with an average score of 87, so that's a bit cheeky there.

Imo, it did deserve to be over 90 but whatever.
Click to expand...
They use all scored products so both versions are taken into account
 
imo, i dont see any games from activision has "anything" to do with Microsoft.
So any good games coming from them, will be kudos to the publisher not to Microsoft tbh.

Especially the relationship between Microsoft and Activision doesnt smell like "hey they always work together closely previosly".
Activision just gets acquired by Microsoft suddenly, thats it.
 
Last edited:
lh032 said:
imo, i dont see any games from activision has "anything" to do with Microsoft.
So any good games coming from them, will be kudos to the publisher not to Microsoft tbh.

Especially the relationship between Microsoft and Activision doesnt smell like "hey they always work together closely previosly".
Activision just gets acquired by Microsoft suddenly, thats it.
Click to expand...
I suppose you won't count Bungie games as Sony games and that you don't count Returnal as a Sony game then, do you?
 
onesvenus said:
I suppose you won't count Bungie games as Sony games and that you don't count Returnal as a Sony game then, do you?
Click to expand...
not sure if serious about returnal?

A simple google can answer your question. Majority of their games published by Sony. They have a long history working with Sony.

Out of all the devs you picked housemarque to counter my argument?

Housemarque - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
Last edited:
lh032 said:
not sure if serious about returnal?

A simple google can answer your question. Majority of their games published by Sony. They have a long history working with Sony.

Out of all the devs you picked housemarque to counter my argument?

Housemarque - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
It's a game not developed by Sony and published by them.

Do you really think the relationship between Sony and Housemarque was more involved than the one Microsoft and Activision will have when Microsoft owns them? Really? 🤦‍♂️
 
onesvenus said:
It's a game not developed by Sony and published by them.

Do you really think the relationship between Sony and Housemarque was more involved than the one Microsoft and Activision will have when Microsoft owns them? Really? 🤦‍♂️
Click to expand...
yes.

Relationship between Sony and Housemarque was more involved than Microsoft and Activision.
 
That's interesting, kudos to Microsoft and Phil Spencer. They really have turned that sinking ship around.

On another note, this counts all games published by Microsoft, Sony, Activision, etc whether it's first or third party developed games?
 
fatmarco said:
They link to the Xbox One version of Psychonauts 2 though, with 11 reviews averaging at a 91.

The main reviewed version of Psychonauts 2 however was the Series X version with an average score of 87, so that's a bit cheeky there.

Imo, it did deserve to be over 90 but whatever.
Click to expand...
Things like this are all over metacritic.

Metacritic performances have to be taken with a huge grain of salt.
 
Markio128 said:
I literally typed in Crossfire X publisher and Xbox game studios is showing as one of the publishers. Not sure how that translates to trolling 😂
Click to expand...
You not being capable to Google such a simple thing as "crossfire X publisher" doesn't make your post true.

IOdRX0p.jpg
 
Banjo64 said:
Pathetic.
Click to expand...
its a fact.
being fanboy is one thing, being a fanboy without valid argument is another thing.

I did not deny the relationship between Bethesda and Microsoft, but i really dont see the "close partner" between activision and Microsft.
 
lh032 said:
its a fact.
being fanboy is one thing, being a fanboy without valid argument is another thing.

I did not deny the relationship between Bethesda and Microsoft, but i really dont see the "close partner" between activision and Microsft.
Click to expand...
It's amazing that on the one hand you are capable of such a succinct thought but on the other hand your statement perfectly applies to your previous comments.

It's also pretty funny that the most militant fanboys are the ones to accuse everyone else of being a fanboy.
 
Banjo64 said:
It's amazing that on the one hand you are capable of such a succinct thought but on the other hand your statement perfectly applies to your previous comments.

It's also pretty funny that the most militant fanboys are the ones to accuse everyone else of being a fanboy.
Click to expand...
Kenan Thompson Reaction GIF by NBC
 
lh032 said:
its a fact.
being fanboy is one thing, being a fanboy without valid argument is another thing.

I did not deny the relationship between Bethesda and Microsoft, but i really dont see the "close partner" between activision and Microsft.
Click to expand...
What are you even crying about? Activision isn't even part of this years Microsoft list, so why even make this point? And when they do own them any game made by Activision will be solely at the discretion if Microsoft, i.e. they'll be responsible. Either way you're argument holds no water. You don't get much closer than being owned.
 
RafterXL said:
What are you even crying about? Activision isn't even part of this years Microsoft list, so why even make this point? And when they do own them any game made by Activision will be solely at the discretion if Microsoft, i.e. they'll be responsible. Either way you're argument holds no water. You don't get much closer than being owned.
Click to expand...
No shit.
Relationship between Activision and Microsoft is not even close before the acquisition, thats what i was saying compared to housemarque and Sony.
 
Games so good, yet still in third in console sales. There seem to be a disconnect between apparent game quality and resulting success. I wonder why..
 
The_Mike said:
You not being capable to Google such a simple thing as "crossfire X publisher" doesn't make your post true.

IOdRX0p.jpg
Click to expand...
I'll hold my hands up and apologise if I'm wrong, but Google does state several times that the game was published in partnership with xbox game studios. My first comment was a little joke, sorry for any upset and distress this may have caused.
Sorry Joey Tribbiani GIF
 
lh032 said:
yes.

Relationship between Sony and Housemarque was more involved than Microsoft and Activision.
Click to expand...
Notice that I'm talking about the future relationship between Microsoft and Activision.
You are talking about future games, so I think what you should take into account is their future relationship.
The relationship they had in the past means nothing about the one they'll have in the future.

Having said that, it's obvious why you don't want to group them under the same umbrella so let's not keep going off-topic
 
lh032 said:
No shit.
Relationship between Activision and Microsoft is not even close before the acquisition, thats what i was saying compared to housemarque and Sony.
Click to expand...
If it's no shit why are you even bringing it up? Wtf does Activision and Microsofts current relationship have to do with this list?
 
Well deserved. Phil truly transformed not only Xbox but gaming as a whole with Gamepass with Sony following that approach with Project Spartacus.
 
Well deserved, they really managed to push out a lot of great stuff during the second half of the year.
 
For some reason I thought it would be Nintendo, since they are consistent. But they aren't even on the list.
 
In spite of the clownboyism from both sides (You PS and Xbox loyalist) This is good. That means Sony need to bring the smoke for next year. And in the end, the gamers win.

Congrats to Microsoft.
 
lh032 said:
yes.

Relationship between Sony and Housemarque was more involved than Microsoft and Activision.
Click to expand...
Activision has been releasing games for the MS DOS and Windows operating systems and even the MSX since the early 1980s. That is a long and fruitful relationship they have with MS.

Pedro Motta said:
Their investment on Stevivor paid off.
Click to expand...
I need to check if Stevivor's GT7 review has been finished yet, thanks for the heads-up.
 
Last edited:
lh032 said:
No shit.
Relationship between Activision and Microsoft is not even close before the acquisition, thats what i was saying compared to housemarque and Sony.
Click to expand...
they are not the same.
Both released the game, before being acquired.

Housemarque will have relationship with Sony, once they release a game under Sony. Just like how bethesda still doesnt have relationship with MS for their deathloop.

You need to release a product under that company to have a relatonship, not just 2nd party exclusive.

Housemarque was like insomniac to MS, before Sony bought them.
 
Well deserved they had genuinely really great output in 2021, especially the last 6 months!

Huge surprise for myself was psychonauts 2, loved that game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Dustborn wins "Shitty Ass Game Of The Year Award"
2
76
6K
hemo memo replied
GDC & IGF Awards 2025 | Game of the Year winners
3
434
ShaiKhulud1989 replied
Should sales be a major contributing factor to a game of the year award?
2
64
2K
Loomy replied
  • Poll
Mario Kart World Metacritic score
Hype  2 3
119
1K
Thebonehead replied
  • Poll
Metacritic highlights the decline of Western games and the rise of Japan
2 3
100
6K
RetroGamingUK replied
Top Bottom