Haha, not really.linked site said:Have you ever wondered how new technologies get developed in Microsoft?
Shogmaster said:You guys are so near-sighted.
Laugh all you want copying of inconsequential small turdies like these, but what about the big picture cool shit like Tablet PCs? Talk about something Apple should have been all over from the get go.....
Bill Gates yesterday acknowledged that Microsoft was being outclassed by some of its competitors such as Google and Apple, but said that the situation was not different from any other time in history and Microsoft remains the overall industry leader. Answering questions on Microsoft's growth potential at developer conference, Gates also touted the new Aqua-like look of Office 12, the next version of its popular business productivity suite, according to The Seattle Post-Intelligencer: "He compared the current rivalries to legendary ones with Lotus, Novell and WordPerfect -- situations in which the Redmond company ultimately overcame steep odds to prevail. 'At any point in our history, we've had competitors who were better at doing something,' Gates said, ...underscoring the fact that it wouldn't be unprecedented to come from behind now."
"Sony is ahead of us in video games. We're just on the verge of something (the Xbox 360) that will help us close the gap there. In Web search, Google is the far-away leader. Big honeymoon for them. Even if they do 'me, too' type stuff, people think, 'wow.' And Apple in music has done a fantastic job."
Gates said Microsoft would match its competitors in areas where they have done well: "We'll match what they do, we'll bring new things to it, do it better and integrate it in with other things. And so it's very healthy for the consumer. We see that in search, we see it in music. It's not new at all that that's out there."
SteveMeister said:Yeah, because that's such a huuuuge market...
steal from Apple? i think you mean steal from Konfabulator.Burger said:Isn't that... the same as...
It's about time they started to steal more ideas from Apple. I wish they went and stole the whole OS![]()
scorcho said:steal from Apple? i think you mean steal from Konfabulator.
ha. from the little bit of information given this looks like it will take the best aspects of both Konfabulator and Dashboard. Gadgets can run on both the desktop and the Sidebar (when did this feature come back to Vista?) and can make use of DHTML/Atlas and Active-X.Shogmaster said:Shhhhh~ There people that still think MS stole the GUI from Apple instead of Xerox PARC.![]()
Shogmaster said:Shhhhh~ There people that still think MS stole the GUI from Apple instead of Xerox PARC.![]()
i believe at Apple's low point they struck a deal with Microsoft to continue publishing their Office suite for the platform and 'invest' a couple of hundred million in non-voting Apple stock as a good faith measure. it's far from owning, and i don't know if Apple purchased it back from MS.human5892 said:Semi-related: what is the deal with Microsoft and Apple's financial relation? Doesn't the former have a stake in the latter?
My marketing professor tried to claim yesterday that MS "owned" Apple -- as in, completely -- but I didn't think that sounded very likely. I don't really follow this stuff normally, though.
AB 101 said:Well, it just took MS much longer to get it right.
Shogmaster said:Shhhhh~ There people that still think MS stole the GUI from Apple instead of Xerox PARC.![]()
Shogmaster said:You guys are so near-sighted.
Laugh all you want copying of inconsequential small turdies like these, but what about the big picture cool shit like Tablet PCs? Talk about something Apple should have been all over from the get go.....
Phoenix said:Actually Microsoft DID steal the GUI from Apple who LICENSED the GUI from Xerox PARC.
Let's at least keep historical facts straight folks![]()
Shogmaster said:Someone never watched Triumph of the Nerds. Jobs on camera admits to ganking GUI/mouse, OOP, and Networking from PARC.![]()
The history of Jobs, Woz, and the development of the Apple I Computer is well laid out. Soon, we learn that Jobs had disdain for the Macintosh project in the beginning and had no respect for Jef Raskin, the true "father of the Mac." What is interesting is that the folklore of how Jobs "stole" all the technology from Xerox's PARC facility is more legend than fact. Yes, Jobs and other Apple employees did get their ideas from PARC, but they were certainly not the only computer developers to look at what PARC was developing. Initially it wasn't Jobs who was following what Xerox was doing; it was the recently deceased Jef Raskin who kept trying to get Jobs to go to Xerox. Unfortunately, Jobs considered Raskin a "...shithead who could do no good." It was Bill Atkinson (who later developed QuickDraw) who had the star power to motivate Jobs to come and look at the PARC center.
Indeed, instead of stealing PARC's ideas, Xerox essentially traded two "peeks" of their research center in exchange for Xerox getting an opportunity to purchase Apple stock. Xerox did not have the marketing structure to use what they were developing, so letting Apple see what was taking place and using it was mutually beneficial to both companies.
Phoenix said:Apple Confidential 2.0
Don't forget gdesklets on Linux, which I use for counting down to Iwata's speech.scorcho said:steal from Apple? i think you mean steal from Konfabulator.
...or Samurize...
...or AveDesk...
...or the multitude of other 'widget' programs that came out before Dashboard
better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission sometimes. Both parties ended up satisfied and that's all that matters.Shogmaster said:You do realise that Xerox did take Apple to court for ganking the IPs and the agreement you are refering to took place after the fact?
It's a common misconception that Microsoft owns any stake in Apple. Microsoft sold all of that non-voting stock (at a nice profit) back in August 2002.scorcho said:i believe at Apple's low point they struck a deal with Microsoft to continue publishing their Office suite for the platform and 'invest' a couple of hundred million in non-voting Apple stock as a good faith measure. it's far from owning, and i don't know if Apple purchased it back from MS.
borghe said:better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission sometimes. Both parties ended up satisfied and that's all that matters.
Shogmaster said:I hardly think Xerox is "satisfied" with the end results. :lol
Nope. Satisfied isn't quite apt for the situation.![]()
borghe said:I don't see how they couldn't be. They received money from a design and concept that they never would have been able to market.
Shog, I don't think even you can deny that Win95 was a blatant ripoff of MacOS at that time. The whole philosophy of the OS workings and usability shifted 180 degrees from Win3.1 to Win95, and made it so much more like Mac OS.Shhhhh~ There people that still think MS stole the GUI from Apple instead of Xerox PARC.![]()
Marconelly said:Shog, I don't think even you can deny that Win95 was a blatant ripoff of MacOS at that time. The whole philosophy of the OS workings and usability shifted 180 degrees from Win3.1 to Win95, and made it so much more like Mac OS.
Shogmaster said:I used Win 95 at home, and Mac OS at work during those days and I say nyet!
Marconelly said:Come on Shog, it did. Win3.1 was all centered around working with program groups and some craps like that, and all of a sudden in Win95, it was all folder based, with desktop that functioned exactly like Mac desktop, with files and shortcuts on desktop, your main HD drives listed there (My computer), trascan on the desktop and the start menu (which was very simillar to Apple menu). Those are some basic things there.
SteveMeister said:To be fair, the Apple Lisa's OS and GUI were the direct result of Apple using stuff they saw at Xerox PARC. Mac OS was a significant refinement of the concept. I've used Xerox computers, and there is actually very little beyond the concept of a "desktop" with windows and menus and the use of a mouse that survived all the way to even the first Mac OS. And before you ask, yes, I've used a Lisa as well![]()
Futureman said:It doesn't matter who came up with the idea of "widgets" or "gadgets" or whatever first. The fact of the matter is, if Apple didn't implement widgets and dashboard into Tiger, there would be no Microsoft Gadgets.
Linux had it long before either.retardboy said:Didn't Microsoft have their sidebar long before Apple released Tiger? I mean the sidebar disappeared for a while, but it was still there and had their "gadgets" in it. The gadgets thing insn't new. The only reason why there are news stories on it now is because it's resurfaced.