• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Microsoft Gadgets

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hyoushi

Member
dokyhe.jpg


http://microsoftgadgets.com/default.aspx

:D
 
Isn't that... the same as...

It's about time they started to steal more ideas from Apple. I wish they went and stole the whole OS :(
 
That's the most bland weather widget I've seen so far; and perhaps the most elaborate stocks one I've seen. Ah well, Microsoft should've done this months ago, before Konfabulator became free, but I suppose that if it follows on the heels of Yahoo's and Apple's widgets and uses a mixture of JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, then Yahoo may find themselves trapped between the two OS vendors' integration of their new acquisition. Konfabulator came first to boot, but who knows, perhaps Microsoft landed the patent to the idea after their latest series of absurd patent grabs.
 
this is cool, i really want a translator like Tiger has though. It would be nice cause i use Konfabulator currently and i love it.

Anyone know better websites that are devoted to widgets and things like that for konfabulator?
 
Wow! That's hilarious! Wasn't Microsoft named the #2 Innovator on a list of companies a few weeks back? Here's proof! :lol

Of course, most Windows users never touch a Mac, so they'll think these are great, and that Microsoft has done it again!
 
You guys are so near-sighted.

Laugh all you want copying of inconsequential small turdies like these, but what about the big picture cool shit like Tablet PCs? Talk about something Apple should have been all over from the get go.....
 
Shogmaster said:
You guys are so near-sighted.

Laugh all you want copying of inconsequential small turdies like these, but what about the big picture cool shit like Tablet PCs? Talk about something Apple should have been all over from the get go.....

Yeah, because that's such a huuuuge market...
 
From MacNN:

Bill Gates yesterday acknowledged that Microsoft was being outclassed by some of its competitors such as Google and Apple, but said that the situation was not different from any other time in history and Microsoft remains the overall industry leader. Answering questions on Microsoft's growth potential at developer conference, Gates also touted the new Aqua-like look of Office 12, the next version of its popular business productivity suite, according to The Seattle Post-Intelligencer: "He compared the current rivalries to legendary ones with Lotus, Novell and WordPerfect -- situations in which the Redmond company ultimately overcame steep odds to prevail. 'At any point in our history, we've had competitors who were better at doing something,' Gates said, ...underscoring the fact that it wouldn't be unprecedented to come from behind now."

"Sony is ahead of us in video games. We're just on the verge of something (the Xbox 360) that will help us close the gap there. In Web search, Google is the far-away leader. Big honeymoon for them. Even if they do 'me, too' type stuff, people think, 'wow.' And Apple in music has done a fantastic job."

Gates said Microsoft would match its competitors in areas where they have done well: "We'll match what they do, we'll bring new things to it, do it better and integrate it in with other things. And so it's very healthy for the consumer. We see that in search, we see it in music. It's not new at all that that's out there."

Well there ya go. And no offense, Shog, but I'll care about tablet PCs when I find the need for one.
 
SteveMeister said:
Yeah, because that's such a huuuuge market...

Probably bigger than the entire Mac market share. :P

But seriously, all laptops will be like these in years ahead. Sooner rather than later IMO.
 
Burger said:
Isn't that... the same as...

It's about time they started to steal more ideas from Apple. I wish they went and stole the whole OS :(
steal from Apple? i think you mean steal from Konfabulator.

...or Samurize...

...or AveDesk...

...or the multitude of other 'widget' programs that came out before Dashboard
 
Shogmaster said:
Shhhhh~ There people that still think MS stole the GUI from Apple instead of Xerox PARC. ;)
ha. from the little bit of information given this looks like it will take the best aspects of both Konfabulator and Dashboard. Gadgets can run on both the desktop and the Sidebar (when did this feature come back to Vista?) and can make use of DHTML/Atlas and Active-X.
 
Semi-related: what is the deal with Microsoft and Apple's financial relation? Doesn't the former have a stake in the latter?

My marketing professor tried to claim yesterday that MS "owned" Apple -- as in, completely -- but I didn't think that sounded very likely. I don't really follow this stuff normally, though.
 
050415_start_copying.jpg


Kind of amusing that Apple would dare reference a 'photocopier' in making fun of a competitor, considering where the origins of their own OS lie.
 
human5892 said:
Semi-related: what is the deal with Microsoft and Apple's financial relation? Doesn't the former have a stake in the latter?

My marketing professor tried to claim yesterday that MS "owned" Apple -- as in, completely -- but I didn't think that sounded very likely. I don't really follow this stuff normally, though.
i believe at Apple's low point they struck a deal with Microsoft to continue publishing their Office suite for the platform and 'invest' a couple of hundred million in non-voting Apple stock as a good faith measure. it's far from owning, and i don't know if Apple purchased it back from MS.
 
AB 101 said:
Well, it just took MS much longer to get it right.

Actually, MS just didn't start to impliment it until well after Apple started on it (Apple didn't bother to license the GUI from PARC and started work on their own version as soon as Jobs got the demo of the ALTO's GUI from PARC staffers). So Apple started GUI work for Lisa, back in 1982 or so, but MS only started on Windows 1.0 around 1984, when they realised that it was by then pointless to wait for a legal license for GUI from PARC, and even then, it was just a glorified wrapper for DOS.

Really, the incredible success of DOS hampered MS's bonafied GUI OS efforts since they didn't want to abandon something that was still accounting for the lion's share of their profits. So they kept building their version of the GUI on top of increasingly ancient DOS up until the birth of NT.
 
Shogmaster said:
Shhhhh~ There people that still think MS stole the GUI from Apple instead of Xerox PARC. ;)

Actually Microsoft DID steal the GUI from Apple who LICENSED the GUI from Xerox PARC.

Let's at least keep historical facts straight folks :)
 
Shogmaster said:
You guys are so near-sighted.

Laugh all you want copying of inconsequential small turdies like these, but what about the big picture cool shit like Tablet PCs? Talk about something Apple should have been all over from the get go.....

When the laptop market matures to that point then Apple will get involved with it (which is likely to be soon). Tablet PCs have been a fiscal and volume failure for all companies who have participated in that technology death march thus far. The only people making money on them are the people who were doing touch screen portables BEFORE they were called Tablet PCs. Microsoft didn't invent them - I worked on things from Telxon and Symbol looooooooooong before Microsoft came out with the Tablet PC.
 
Phoenix said:
Actually Microsoft DID steal the GUI from Apple who LICENSED the GUI from Xerox PARC.

Let's at least keep historical facts straight folks :)

Someone never watched Triumph of the Nerds. Jobs on camera admits to ganking GUI/mouse, OOP, and Networking from PARC. :P
 
Shogmaster said:
Someone never watched Triumph of the Nerds. Jobs on camera admits to ganking GUI/mouse, OOP, and Networking from PARC. :P


The history of Jobs, Woz, and the development of the Apple I Computer is well laid out. Soon, we learn that Jobs had disdain for the Macintosh project in the beginning and had no respect for Jef Raskin, the true "father of the Mac." What is interesting is that the folklore of how Jobs "stole" all the technology from Xerox's PARC facility is more legend than fact. Yes, Jobs and other Apple employees did get their ideas from PARC, but they were certainly not the only computer developers to look at what PARC was developing. Initially it wasn't Jobs who was following what Xerox was doing; it was the recently deceased Jef Raskin who kept trying to get Jobs to go to Xerox. Unfortunately, Jobs considered Raskin a "...shithead who could do no good." It was Bill Atkinson (who later developed QuickDraw) who had the star power to motivate Jobs to come and look at the PARC center.

Indeed, instead of stealing PARC's ideas, Xerox essentially traded two "peeks" of their research center in exchange for Xerox getting an opportunity to purchase Apple stock. Xerox did not have the marketing structure to use what they were developing, so letting Apple see what was taking place and using it was mutually beneficial to both companies.

Apple Confidential 2.0
 
Phoenix said:
Apple Confidential 2.0


You do realise that Xerox did take Apple to court for ganking the IPs and the agreement you are refering to took place after the fact?

You really should rent Triumph of the Nerds or even better, read Accidental Empires to get the whole story.
 
scorcho said:
steal from Apple? i think you mean steal from Konfabulator.

...or Samurize...

...or AveDesk...

...or the multitude of other 'widget' programs that came out before Dashboard
Don't forget gdesklets on Linux, which I use for counting down to Iwata's speech. :)
 
Shogmaster said:
You do realise that Xerox did take Apple to court for ganking the IPs and the agreement you are refering to took place after the fact?
better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission sometimes. Both parties ended up satisfied and that's all that matters.
 
scorcho said:
i believe at Apple's low point they struck a deal with Microsoft to continue publishing their Office suite for the platform and 'invest' a couple of hundred million in non-voting Apple stock as a good faith measure. it's far from owning, and i don't know if Apple purchased it back from MS.
It's a common misconception that Microsoft owns any stake in Apple. Microsoft sold all of that non-voting stock (at a nice profit) back in August 2002.
 
It doesn't matter who came up with the idea of "widgets" or "gadgets" or whatever first. The fact of the matter is, if Apple didn't implement widgets and dashboard into Tiger, there would be no Microsoft Gadgets.
 
borghe said:
better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission sometimes. Both parties ended up satisfied and that's all that matters.

I hardly think Xerox is "satisfied" with the end results. :lol

Nope. Satisfied isn't quite apt for the situation. ;)
 
I don't see how they couldn't be. They received money from a design and concept that they never would have been able to market.
 
Shogmaster said:
I hardly think Xerox is "satisfied" with the end results. :lol

Nope. Satisfied isn't quite apt for the situation. ;)

why don't you explain yourself instead of making some vague statement with a fucking retarded little smiley?
 
borghe said:
I don't see how they couldn't be. They received money from a design and concept that they never would have been able to market.

Dude, that shite that was posted utterly wrong. It's like reading about the Chinese and Korean occupation by the Japanese in Japanese text books!

Xerox was HUGE! Much bigger than Apple. And the existance of PARC plenty shows that they had the R and D resources to do the work. It wasn't that Xerox coudln't bring those ideas to fruition, it's that Xerox execs lacked the foresight to nurture the seeds that they possesed! They had absolutely no idea what they were giving away.

They actually thought that PCs threatened the Xerox's core paper business because advances in PCs would make the "paperless office" a reality! :lol The irony is that as PCs advanced, so did paper usage in the office space.
 
Apple may have made this popular, but it really is Konfabulator that gets the credit for making the concept popular enough to steal.

Although really, the whole idea is more like Borland Sidekick than anything.
 
Shhhhh~ There people that still think MS stole the GUI from Apple instead of Xerox PARC. ;)
Shog, I don't think even you can deny that Win95 was a blatant ripoff of MacOS at that time. The whole philosophy of the OS workings and usability shifted 180 degrees from Win3.1 to Win95, and made it so much more like Mac OS.
 
Marconelly said:
Shog, I don't think even you can deny that Win95 was a blatant ripoff of MacOS at that time. The whole philosophy of the OS workings and usability shifted 180 degrees from Win3.1 to Win95, and made it so much more like Mac OS.

I used Win 95 at home, and Mac OS at work during those days and I say nyet!
 
Come on Shog, it did. Win3.1 was all centered around working with program groups and some craps like that, and all of a sudden in Win95, it was all folder based, with desktop that functioned exactly like Mac desktop, with files and shortcuts on desktop, your main HD drives listed there (My computer), trascan on the desktop and the start menu (which was very simillar to Apple menu). Those are some basic things there.
 
Although I do find it ironic that the apple faithful are making claims of MS Gadgets being a copy from the MAc OS when the Dashboard is a blatant, blatant ripoff of Konfabulator. Not just in concept, but in implementation and look-and-feel.
 
I don't think anyone is arguing that Mac didn't take it from other widget apps for *nixes. I just think they are more or less calling MS on being the LAST guest to show up at the party, once again.

same thing with GUI OSes. Did Mac invent it? No, but it wasn't until Apple's proof of concepts for the most part that MS decided to head in those directions.

Apple culls the best from everyone else and mainstreams it. MS pulls directly from Apple and slaps a different name on it.
 
Marconelly said:
Come on Shog, it did. Win3.1 was all centered around working with program groups and some craps like that, and all of a sudden in Win95, it was all folder based, with desktop that functioned exactly like Mac desktop, with files and shortcuts on desktop, your main HD drives listed there (My computer), trascan on the desktop and the start menu (which was very simillar to Apple menu). Those are some basic things there.


You know, thinking back, I have to agree with some of the above. I had forgotten all about how 3.1 functioned. I think I blocked most of it out of my mind. :lol

But to be fair, Win 1.0 to 3.1 was just happen to differ quite abit from the general model set up by Alto's GUI, and that Mac OS was really close to Alto's and MS just realised afterwards that it's the right way to go and joined in.
 
To be fair, the Apple Lisa's OS and GUI were the direct result of Apple using stuff they saw at Xerox PARC. Mac OS was a significant refinement of the concept. I've used Xerox computers, and there is actually very little beyond the concept of a "desktop" with windows and menus and the use of a mouse that survived all the way to even the first Mac OS. And before you ask, yes, I've used a Lisa as well :)
 
SteveMeister said:
To be fair, the Apple Lisa's OS and GUI were the direct result of Apple using stuff they saw at Xerox PARC. Mac OS was a significant refinement of the concept. I've used Xerox computers, and there is actually very little beyond the concept of a "desktop" with windows and menus and the use of a mouse that survived all the way to even the first Mac OS. And before you ask, yes, I've used a Lisa as well :)

Nice! I've never even seen Alto in person. Seen Lisa box, but it wasn't functional I don't think.

But with what I've seen of Alto in action (in video), it's closer to Mac OS than Win 1.0~3.1. Honestly, I don't even know where MS was going with pre 95 Windows. :lol But at least it allowed me to escape from typing DOS commands. :D




BTW, it's utterly amazing how much of the major developements in computing originated with Xerox PARC: The GUI, mouse, ethernet/networking, object oriented programming, WYSIWYG printing, on and on. If Xerox had managed hold on to all these IPs that were created and developed in house, they could have been WAY bigger than Microsoft.
 
when and where do we download these gadgets?
 
Futureman said:
It doesn't matter who came up with the idea of "widgets" or "gadgets" or whatever first. The fact of the matter is, if Apple didn't implement widgets and dashboard into Tiger, there would be no Microsoft Gadgets.

Didn't Microsoft have their sidebar long before Apple released Tiger? I mean the sidebar disappeared for a while, but it was still there and had their "gadgets" in it. The gadgets thing insn't new. The only reason why there are news stories on it now is because it's resurfaced.
 
retardboy said:
Didn't Microsoft have their sidebar long before Apple released Tiger? I mean the sidebar disappeared for a while, but it was still there and had their "gadgets" in it. The gadgets thing insn't new. The only reason why there are news stories on it now is because it's resurfaced.
Linux had it long before either.

BTW, Enlightenment had epplets in 2000. Then there's also superkaramba. Konfabulator was 2003. The water's a bit muddy for people to be making such claims.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom