All Atom netbooks can as far as I know.
Oh, I thought you meant it was preinstalled. Still cool though.
All Atom netbooks can as far as I know.
All Atom netbooks can as far as I know.
You should wait for the Lenovo Tablet 2 price. Its an atom tablet that has battery life almost as long as the note; has pen support and runs real photoshop; plus you can dualboot Android.
Really the only down side is shorter battery life and maybe 100 more expensive.
wait wtf ? srsly ?
I have a Acer Aspire One ZG5 from like 5 years ago and your telling me it can run Android ?
intel Atom N270 ?
because windows 7 sort of runs like ass on it
will dual boot asap lol
I'd imagine that this cost more than an actual surface.
![]()
What is the story on this?
That's a big cake? Wow..
MS was having a windows 8 party and they made a giant cake.
Look at the lockscreen of the "Surface". It says 9:14.
Most likely a public showing that people can interact with it and price details for the rtits a cake? i need a link to this.
what does that mean?
its a cake? i need a link to this.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/10/3232879/surface-cake-windows-8-party-microsoft-campusMicrosoft held a Windows 8 celebration at its Redmond headquarters earlier this week on August 8th (8/8), but while the company didn't manage to make 8888 the final build of its latest operating system, it was able to create a giant Surface cake for the party. The impressive cake, which includes a table and five Surface devices, was on display for members of the Windows team to celebrate a fully baked version of Windows 8.
what does that mean?
so September 14 =/Probably launch date?
so can i eat the screen? or is that real. it looks real.
so September 14 =/
so can i eat the screen? or is that real. it looks real.
Acer: Please Microsoft, just dont make Surface too cheap
http://www.slashgear.com/acer-please-microsoft-just-dont-make-surface-too-cheap-10242531/
Desperation is a stinky cologne.
sadlyAnd Microsoft will surely comply.
I don't think that entire thing was a cake, just the little surfaces on top.
There were App Store cupcakes though, and they were positively delicious!
I dunno, I didn't actually see the surface cake until I saw my friends' pictures from it later :-( maybe it was a giant cake!
its just OEM's being lazy as fuck. they think they can push a lackluster product to market and get bank on the poor man or avg consumer because they don't mean shit to them. and they see MS's push of the surface as raising the non existent bar(which was quite fucking low to begin with), which would either take a cut of there profits or make them spend money on some R&D which would still hurt them in the short run. honestly i can't blame MS, after years of seeing their product on shit hardware being the butt of all jokes. VIZO is the only one company actually doing anything note worthy.What's that Acer guy whining about. Surface is pretty much the only thing surrounding Win8 that's getting positive publicity. He should be happy that MS got people to take note of Win 8 tablets.
well there is that asus all-in-one computer/tablet. =/
It’s also worth taking a moment to describe how our collaboration on these PC efforts has been different than in any other Windows release. Our engineering collaboration on these Windows RT PCs has been strong, collaborating with the PC manufacturers, Silicon partners, and Operators to focus on hardware, software and services integration. Each respective partner was committed to sharing early iterations of their products, whether it was a SoC bring-up board, early builds of Windows RT, firmware and drivers, or hundreds of pre-release PC hardware samples (such as the ones featured in earlier demonstrations and videos). Product designs were informed and revised by our collective efforts through development and testing. As a result, all of these Windows RT PCs will have consistent fast and fluid touch interactions, long battery life, connected standby, and are beautiful, thin, and light designs. All of these are designed to make the most of the capabilities of Windows RT.
The measurements are based on firmware still undergoing final optimizations, and the just released Windows RT RTM code, and will only improve as the PCs move towards manufacture. To provide context on the significance of the measurement, it is important to understand how the scenario was measured. In this case, the PC was playing back in full screen a local HD video at full resolution with a screen brightness of 200 nits. It was also configured for one email account using the Microsoft network. Finally, these numbers are also influenced by the different PC form factors themselves, which include both tablets and laptops, screen sizes that vary from 10.1” to 11.6”, and battery sizes spanning 25 Whr to 42 Whr.
Scenario
HD Video Playback: 8 hours to 13 hours of scenario run time
Connected Standby: 320 hours to 409 hours of scenario run time
1366x768 is just the minumum resolution requirement.So will any RT tablet have high resolution screen , or will they all be 1366x768?
They also published the number "13 hours" in the exact same cell of the table, but you're choosing to deliberately ignore it?
What next?
"Weight? 1200g? That's 2.6 pounds! That's almost as much as a laptop! Nearly twice the iPad! Hah!"
So will any RT tablet have high resolution screen , or will they all be 1366x768?
I am starting to think Acer is not saying these things to MS. My theory is that Acer is signalling. They are saying this to Dell and Samsung. Becuase really, you don't need to say the same shit 3 times.
What Acer is trying to do and invite Dell and Samsung, who have the early RT access to collectively give Microsoft's RT initiative the cold shoulder. Lenovo IMO has shown its hand. It has shown an atom tablet but not the RT tablet, that to me says that Lenovo cares more about the regular W8 platform.
It will be real interesting to see what will Dell do. They are basically pinch hitting for HP after HP turn down Microaoft's early access invitation.
I am starting to think Acer is not saying these things to MS. My theory is that Acer is signalling. They are saying this to Dell and Samsung. Becuase really, you don't need to say the same shit 3 times.
What Acer is trying to do and invite Dell and Samsung, who have the early RT access to collectively give Microsoft's RT initiative the cold shoulder. Lenovo IMO has shown its hand. It has shown an atom tablet but not the RT tablet, that to me says that Lenovo cares more about the regular W8 platform.
It will be real interesting to see what will Dell do. They are basically pinch hitting for HP after HP turn down Microaoft's early access invitation.
Have a link? Was HP ever asked?
Microsoft is about to show off the new hardware the will help them
![]()
LEAP!
over the competition. Suck his dust, Apple!
There's no evidence that I've seen that indicates that they were ever invited in the first place though, just a statement that they "weren't interested in making RT products" which sounds they weren't given the option to do so. I'm sure the trouble both companies had with the Slate 500 has something to do with it.http://mobile.theverge.com/2012/8/1...-samsung-windows-rt-tablets-laptops-confirmed
Or search HP windows RT on theverge.com
So my laptop's resolution is 1280x800 - is that acceptable? I want to upgrade from Vista (thanks, new HDD from Dell).1366x768 is just the minumum resolution requirement.
There's no evidence that I've seen that indicates that they were ever invited in the first place though, just a statement that they "weren't interested in making RT products" which sounds they weren't given the option to do so. I'm sure the trouble both companies had with the Slate 500 has something to do with it.
Hadn't seen that china times article, thanks.
http://mobile.theverge.com/2012/8/1...-samsung-windows-rt-tablets-laptops-confirmed
Or search HP windows RT on theverge.com
that is just for Windows 8 certified hardware. I think 1024x768 or whatever is the min spec for Metro applications, and to get the snap view (2 applications at once 1/3 and 3/4) i think it may be 1366.So my laptop's resolution is 1280x800 - is that acceptable? I want to upgrade from Vista (thanks, new HDD from Dell).
...
I saw that China Times article back in July. Like to see where they got the rumored OEM list from. Microsoft didnt confirm OEMs till today.