• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

MLB Postseason 2013 |OT| - Chicken n Beer-less Diet

Dodgers/Cardinals NLCS

Red Sox/Tigers ALCS

Someone wake me up when it's over.
It's okay. Puig's got this.

PmX3mJ0.png
 

xbhaskarx

Member
Just like last year, all the teams with smaller payrolls and interesting stories are out of the playoffs by the LCS, and once again the rich get richer.

I've been to every A's home playoff game from 2000-2014, there were some great wins in that stretch (against the Yanks and Sox in the early years my favorite was the Ramon Hernandez walk-off bunt, Marco Scutaro beating the Twins in 06 the only time the A's advanced, amazing comebacks in game 162 and game 4 last year, the walk-off in game 2 this year), but a hell of a lot of elimination game losses.

I stopped following the NBA in the Shaq/Kobe era after I could no longer convince myself that the league and their refs (even before Tim Donaghy) would give every team a fair chance. I'm not delusional enough to believe that the A's should have won this series if not for a few calls or because they were the better team (they should have won if their bullpen had been managed better in game 4 but that's on them), facing Scherzer and Verlander in a five game series is pretty difficult. When everything breaks right for them and they somehow get beyond the big spenders in their division, they're still going to be exposed in the playoffs as they have to rely on flawed players like Colon and Moss whereas the opposing team has Verlander and Cabrera, on top of simply being far better the umpires will consistently give the close calls to the big name players.

I just don't know that I care to continue following MLB until something changes, whether it's a salary cap to bring some parity to the league, balls and strikes no longer being determined by humans, or the league office actually letting the A's leave their raw sewage filled dual-use ballpark in the bankrupt crime-ridden ghetto that is Oakland for the bigger and wealthier city in the same metropolitan area that already has land set aside downtown for a new ballpark. I'm a big fan of capitalism, but sports is about entertainment, and parity is more entertaining than seeing how many championships the big payroll teams can accumulate. Give me capitalism where the A's can move to a bigger market where they will make more money and be competitive, or a socialist salary cap so there's more to being successful than simply buying up all the best players.
 

otapnam

Member
Just like last year, all the teams with smaller payrolls and interesting stories are out of the playoffs by the LCS, and once again the rich get richer.

I've been to every A's home playoff game from 2000-2014, there were some great wins in that stretch (against the Yanks and Sox in the early years my favorite was the Ramon Hernandez walk-off bunt, Marco Scutaro beating the Twins in 06 the only time the A's advanced, amazing comebacks in game 162 and game 4 last year, the walk-off in game 2 this year), but a hell of a lot of elimination game losses.

I stopped following the NBA in the Shaq/Kobe era after I could no longer convince myself that the league and their refs (even before Tim Donaghy) would give every team a fair chance. I'm not delusional enough to believe that the A's should have won this series if not for a few calls or because they were the better team (they should have won if their bullpen had been managed better in game 4 but that's on them), facing Scherzer and Verlander in a five game series is pretty difficult. When everything breaks right for them and they somehow get beyond the big spenders in their division, they're still going to be exposed in the playoffs as they have to rely on flawed players like Colon and Moss whereas the opposing team has Verlander and Cabrera, on top of simply being far better the umpires will consistently give the close calls to the big name players.

I just don't know that I care to continue following MLB until something changes, whether it's a salary cap to bring some parity to the league, balls and strikes no longer being determined by humans, or the league office actually letting the A's leave their raw sewage filled dual-use ballpark in the bankrupt crime-ridden ghetto that is Oakland for the bigger and wealthier city in the same metropolitan area that already has land set aside downtown for a new ballpark. I'm a big fan of capitalism, but sports is about entertainment, and parity is more entertaining than seeing how many championships the big payroll teams can accumulate. Give me capitalism where the A's can move to a bigger market where they will make more money and be competitive, or a socialist salary cap so there's more to being successful than simply buying up all the best players.


Fisher n wolf need to sell the team because they don't care about wins.

Pretty shitty feeling walking out of the coliseum.

Not sure who I want to win now. But the story is set for dodgers sox.....
 

xbhaskarx

Member
Fisher n wolf need to sell the team because they don't care about wins.

That makes no sense. For an ownership group that doesn't care about wins, they field a pretty competitive baseball team that wins quite a few games. They made the best decision they could to win games, re-signing Billy Beane to a contract that makes him the only GM with an ownership stake. On top of that, they are willing to privately fund their own ballpark in downtown San Jose instead of stealing public money like many other sports team owners.
The Coliseum is falling apart, attendance is awful even when they win, Oakland is no longer nationally relevant and even there they are stuck in the middle of an industrial wasteland that's barely connected to the rest of the city. How much revenue is coming in compared to what they're spending, and how does that compare to other owners? They're running a business, not a money-losing charity.
 
Top Bottom