P:axMagellanic
Member
Downstairs is fine, my bedroom is absolutely sweltering though in this humidity lol
I was at a Home depot and saw an AC for just $150. The energy cost for it per year was $44.
If Europe cant afford that then they need to all retire and let the next generation handle things going forward. Complete and utter failure from everyone in charge.
We need a revolution in the streets. It's insane how complacent people have gotten in the today's world.
Right, but it shouldnt cost that much. i get that you have 20% VAT, but that should cover the higher import taxes. The tech inside these ACs is ancient by this point and is extremely cheap to manufacture. And like i said, VERY sustainable in terms of energy consumption. It's not the 80s or 90s anymore, these things dont even cost that much to run.Price here goes from 300€ to 8000€ (plus the mounting which ranges from 200 to 900 €) and you have to couple it with one of the priciest energy bills in the developed world, just to use 2 weeks and forget it.
I don't say it isn't useful but mama's got bills.
I suspect costs are also tied to the fact that, as many said in the thread, AC was mainly and effectively a luxury accessory up until 5 or 6 years ago.Right, but it shouldnt cost that much. i get that you have 20% VAT, but that should cover the higher import taxes. The tech inside these ACs is ancient by this point and is extremely cheap to manufacture. And like i said, VERY sustainable in terms of energy consumption. It's not the 80s or 90s anymore, these things dont even cost that much to run.
I installed a 16 SEER central HVAC system a few years ago and my energy bill went down after i upgraded from the OG system that was installed when the house was built in the 90s. The tech is better, its not about the environment, just let people survive.
€210 for the cheapest unit (9k BTU) here on Amazon. Roughly €40 to run it for 12 hours per day for a full month straight. Well, at least in my city.I was at a Home depot and saw an AC for just $150. The energy cost for it per year was $44.
If Europe cant afford that then they need to all retire and let the next generation handle things going forward. Complete and utter failure from everyone in charge.
We need a revolution in the streets. It's insane how complacent people have gotten in the today's world.
If Europe isn't planning on building new datacenters and new electricity generation capacity they are finishedWeird, I have not noticed any power cuts.
Of course if you go to the Daily Mail article this is not about rationing, as in cutting existing availibility of power, but limits on future capacity users.
And this is mostly due to the companies requesting capacity for future development hedging their bets and requesting capacity for their one new datacenter in multiple regions. This uses up even more future capacity as everyone else does the same thing to not be the one left out and before you know it there is a billion GW in requested capacity for only a fraction of that actually being built. The extra costs in requesting six locations instead of one are obviously way too low and some limits have to be set which is now being done.
If Europe isn't planning on building new datacenters and new electricity generation capacity they are finished
Both America and China are racing to dominate the AI driven future, Europe will just be left behind even more than it already has if they don't plan to do anything (and it sure doesn't seem like they are)
I think Europe can survive without asking the "AI" what to cook for dinner for 5 people.If Europe isn't planning on building new datacenters and new electricity generation capacity they are finished
Both America and China are racing to dominate the AI driven future, Europe will just be left behind even more than it already has if they don't plan to do anything (and it sure doesn't seem like they are)
50% of people without jobs? What a fucking exciting future that is...
Europe is behind mostly because IT giants (Google, Meta, Apple, MS, Nvidia etc.), USA GDP skyrocketed because of them since 2008. Does much higher GDP means that average American has more money now than in 200x? Not really, all that money is in hands of the richest people.
In reality Americans have gotten richer than they have ever been50% of people without jobs? What a fucking exciting future that is...
Europe is behind mostly because IT giants (Google, Meta, Apple, MS, Nvidia etc.), USA GDP skyrocketed because of them since 2008. Does much higher GDP means that average American has more money now than in 200x? Not really, all that money is in hands of the richest people.
![]()
In reality Americans have gotten richer than they have ever been
![]()
The U.S. added a thousand new millionaires a day in 2024: Report
America's millionaire population totals 23.8 million, the most of any country, according to a new study by UBS.www.cnbc.com
![]()
The Death of the Amex Lounge: Why the Upper Middle Class Isn't Special Anymore
On the rise of the upper middle class and the problems that came with it.ofdollarsanddata.com
There are 23.8 million millionaires in America. The country has a total population of around 334 million. This means 7.1% of the population of the United States are millionaires. If you haven't met a millionaire from America you just haven't tried very hard
I was talking about average man/woman. Millionaires? Good for them I guess...
In America, you choose to be rich or poor. Can't say that about most places on Earth
True.Being a millionaire ain't that hot shit anymore, by that definition I am one as well. Naturally most of it is tied up in the value of my house. So I certainly don't feel like one, I'm well off but I'm certainly not going to be driving a Lambo anytime soon. I'm stuck with the company Tesla.
Also interestingly from that article " Luxembourg and Switzerland have higher concentrations of wealth. In both countries, more than one in seven adults are worth at least $1 million, according to UBS. "
As for datacenters, almost €120 billion worth are currently in construction/planning across Europe, but let's not have facts stand in the way of feelings.
As someone who has lived in Miami on and off most of my life… I have never heard of that. I eat normally, mostly carnivore diet, run, do yoga and even life weights outdoors sometimes.
This is patently false. There is no EU regulation that bans the use of mobile or window AC unit use. They are being sold in many member states. Also, The EU cannot make rules on what applicances can hang out the window or not, that is local legislation. The only thing the EU can do is set energy related requirements for the energy labeling of products, but people can stills buy them.Window air conditioning units, the cheap, convenient, effective cooling solution in response to a heat wave, are effectively banned in Europe due to EU regulations on energy efficiency and noise (and having anything stick out of your window, and probably several other regulations I'm not aware of). Portable hose-exhaust type AC units are sold in stores, passing regulation for some reason, despite being almost useless. The typical recommended solution is a split duct wall-mounted AC, which is not a viable solution for renters lacking AC.
This seems...unreasonable.
![]()
Dude, invest in Solar and get a battery, when it's good and sunny it's more than enough to run my place and have it charge the battery, don't bother feeding back into the grid the infrastructure hasn't been updated to properly handle it so it just wastes it.
This is patently false. There is no EU regulation that bans the use of mobile or window AC unit use. They are being sold in many member states. Also, The EU cannot make rules on what applicances can hang out the window or not, that is local legislation. The only thing the EU can do is set energy related requirements for the energy labeling of products, but people can stills buy them.
The article or the post needs to be rectified on this point because it's absurd misinformation.
Read carefully what I said: "There is no EU regulation that bans the use of mobile or window AC unit use".>According to the EcoDesign Directive 2009/125/EC and Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2012, SEER thresholds for air conditioners were set at 3.6 from 2013, and 4.6 from 2014. Since window units can't meet these limits, particularly the 4.6 SEER, they effectively became non-compliant. Additionally, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 626/2011, which sets energy class standards, prohibits air conditioners below class D (SEER < 2.6) starting in 2013. Therefore, window air conditioners fail to meet these requirements.
>Commission Regulation (EU) No 626/2011 sets energy class labels ranging from A+++ to G, but class G, while the lowest, doesn't prohibit units. The real restriction comes from EcoDesign Regulation (EU) No 206/2012, which imposes minimum efficiency thresholds, effectively phasing out less efficient units. These regulations are interconnected, with 206/2012 enforcing minimum standards. Directive 2002/31/EC previously governed labeling but got replaced in 2011. For detailed info, sources on lines from 206/2012 and 626/2011 referencing the energy label classification are useful to consult.
>The key regulations in the EU restricting window-style air conditioners are the EcoDesign Regulation 206/2012 and Energy Labelling Regulation 626/2011, part of broader directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU. These regulations set efficiency requirements such as the need for a Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) of 4.6 starting January 2014, which window units typically can't meet, effectively banning them. These units are categorized under "room air conditioners" and face restrictions through Ecodesign tiers 1 and 2, impacting their market eligibility.
>According to the EU regulations, fixed single-package units, such as window air conditioners, need to meet specific energy efficiency standards. Regulations like the EcoDesign Regulation 206/2012 and Energy Labelling Regulation 626/2011 require a minimum SEER of 3.6 by 2013 and 4.6 by 2014, which most window AC units cannot achieve. These regulations effectively phase out inefficient units. Additionally, new labeling requirements further limit market competitiveness for low-efficiency units. We should double-check if "fixed single package" includes window ACs.
>Under EU regulations, the EcoDesign Regulation 206/2012 set minimum SEER thresholds of 3.6 for 2013 and 4.6 for 2014, which most window AC units couldn't meet. These units, often having EERs below 3, are effectively banned after 2014. The Energy Labelling Regulation 626/2011 ties into this by requiring a minimum efficiency class, and also banning F-G labels. These regulations together effectively exclude low-efficiency window air conditioners from the market.
>Window-style air conditioning units were effectively forced out of the EU market due to energy efficiency regulations. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 626/2011 introduces energy labeling, scoring window units on a scale from A+++ to D. Typically, they fall under F or G, which were banned starting in 2013 under Ecodesign Regulation (EU) No 206/2012. Tier 1 (2013) set a SEER threshold of 3.6, while Tier 2 (2014) raised it to 4.6, a level many window units can't meet.
You first.Read carefully what I said
You first.
Read carefully what I said: "There is no EU regulation that bans the use of mobile or window AC unit use".
You can buy these or similar ACs and use them. They're on the market in EU. And if you use them, there is no EU police that will take them away from you.
You first.
What's this got to do with anything? The reasons for this rationing (not really rationing at all, but limiting new access to the grid) is clear with a bit of research and it has got little to do with not having sufficient electricity generation. Hint, Russia is one of the reasons to why this is happening. Having too much electricity is another. Use some critical thinking skills instead of regurgitating everything you read on Twitter for a change.
One of the reasons. The various reasons are not enough investing into upgrading the grid, EVs taking off, solar power at home putting more pressure on the grid, and the general shift from gas (accelerated due to the gas cutoff from Russia). So the issue is the Netherlands has plenty of electricity but the grid is not equipped to handle the load. Thus the waiting time for new connections.It has nothing to do with Russia, does it? At least, I don't remember seeing Russia mentioned in the Financial Times article.
The reasons are due to the aggressive shift to heat pumps, EVs, solar, and hydrogen, which have dramatically increased electricity demand.
However, grid expansion has been under invested for decades and can't keep up with the increased demand. It can be fixed, but it will take years and cost hundreds of billions.
I guess Russia might be indirectly involved with the natural gas supply, but it's not the root cause.
TIL, don't argue with Evilore lolWhy was he banned?
Why was he banned?
Not hard to find: https://www.mediamarkt.de/de/category/mobile-klimaanlagen-799.html
Mobile aIr cons are not banned within the EU by any means, they can be bought from anywhere.
They are trash though compared to proper split units.
Not hard to find: https://www.mediamarkt.de/de/category/mobile-klimaanlagen-799.html
Mobile aIr cons are not banned within the EU by any means, they can be bought from anywhere.
They are trash though compared to proper split units.
His wet dream is for Europe to connect to Russian gas via his anus.
The man is a retard, what can I say?
And I thought Korean Fan Death was wild...
No, it's probably that most people in Europe think unbearably hot days are just a small part of an average summer. Plus, most of Europe is in the temperate zone, and there's quite a variety of climates in the continent, so the actual need for AC depends on where you are in Europe. Quite different from most of the Americas, especially the areas more interested by tourism.I think Europe thinks Air Conditioning is American cultural imperialism and before they know it they'll all be shooting each other just like us. It's the only logical reason why so many are so vehemently opposed to it.
I should have said UK it seems like they're the ones more emphatic as to why it can't be done. At least from the responses on here. Summer comes every year but for some reason people love the "I'll only use it a few days" excuseNo, it's probably that most people in Europe think unbearably hot days are just a small part of an average summer. Plus, most of Europe is in the temperate zone, and there's quite a variety of climates in the continent, so the actual need for AC depends on where you are in Europe. Quite different from most of the Americas, especially the areas more interested by tourism.
"Europe" is too vague of a term here. The countries on the Mediterranean Sea naturally tend to be hotter, so the problem is much greater there and in the UK, where anything above 25C was practically hellfire up to a few years ago.
I don't know how it's going in the rest of Europe, but where I live, it's almost heaven compared to 2023 and 2024. I can go most days without using neither the AC, nor a fan. The AC has been broken for almost a month now at work, yet I can absolutely manage by keeping the windows open. In June, it was impossible without using at least a fan. I've been sleeping with just my window open for days now, and barely sweating. In 2023, even with a fan on, I would sweat like a pig and I'd wake up at 6AM because of the heat.
Considering this, I am not surprised if not a few people will delay their decision to put AC in their home for one more year.
Again, I'm really happy I had AC installed where I live, because it really makes the difference between getting stuff done and vegetating on the sofa all day long when it's really hot. But in a summer like this, I can't blame people for thinking it's not an absolute necessity.
Average temperatures have risen in the last decade, though. This is undeniable.