If you went through the trouble of posting the Obama figure, why not post the new one as well?
Fight?! I would make them perform, um, special poses with one another.Now all I need is a Bill Gates figure and then make them fight to the death!!!
and everyone knows you don't buy rev A!I would have bought it for a gag gift, but it's a bit too pricey
How is a pillow creepy?
That's pretty creepyRest in peace
Is he doing a kickflip in the bottom left picture?
Move over Creepy Woody!
Rest in peace
Now all I need is a Bill Gates figure and then make them fight to the death!!!
Okay I feel like an idiot but I don't get this Rest in Peace with the pillow connection to Steve Jobs or why it's creepy I guess is what I mean.
If you're a Jobsian fanboi jonesing for the recently announced Steve Jobs action figure, we have some bad news for you: Apple doesn't want you to have one.
So reports The Telegraph, which says that the Chinese action-figure maker In Icons has received a letter from Cupertino's lawyers threatening legal action should the 12-inch, impressively realistic plastic portrayal be offered for sale.
Apple reportedly wrote 'In Icons', telling the Chinese manufacturer that any toy that resembles Apple's logo or products, or Job's name or appearance, is a 'criminal offense.' Attorneys believe a Steve Jobs action figure released after his death violates the 'right of publicity,' which is a state law that protects one's image, voice, photograph, identity or signature from being used commercially without consent. Furthermore, California's Celebrity Rights Act in 1985 protects a celebrity's personality rights up to 70 years after their death.
Apple obtained permission from the photographer to use a copyrighted image, not permission from Gandhi's family to use his likeness to sell a product that he most likely would have been opposed to.
At least Obama didn't sue....
false edit : beaten like one of woody's victim.
the doll actually looks good.
Who the fuck would want a Steve Jobs doll?
Anyway, Creepy Woody isn't moving over at all. He is still king.
A UK newspaper caused a stir yesterday when it reported that Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) had threatened legal action against a Chinese company that plans to sell an eerie replica of its late founder starting next month. The Daily Telegraph said Apple claims to own rights to Jobs likeness.
But there is a huge problem hereApples legal claim is largely bogus. While people can indeed own rights to their likeness, those rights usually apply only to living people. Unlike other forms of intellectual property like patents or copyrights, image rights do not survive beyond the grave in most places.