The fuck?
He wasn't the leader who was so weak he felt the need to call this referendum.
He wasn't the leader who'd be screwing the working class for the previous 6 or so years.
This is firmly on Cameron. It's his legacy
If they do kick him out though, he goes straight back on the ballot paper for next time (that's the rules) and it's highly likely he'll just walk straight back in.Well, sure, if you wanna get technical about it. But why let a good opportunity to try to get rid of a dude that they despise go unused?
And tbf, it is the best shot NL will have.
Burnham might have, but unlike you I voted Burnham.![]()
It's amazing the effort labour people go to defend a conservative PM and government.
Like whoLabour need a strong leader to rally those people and direct their anger towards the tories
Like who
No one's defending Cameron. What people are angry about is that the referendum was lost in the Labour heartlands and that Corbyn put in an incredibly half-arsed and useless campaign.
The bloke who has repeatedly said he doesn't want it because of his kidsDan Jarvis.
Right.
Let us walk through this.
The referendum was lost on labour heartlands. Any new leader labour could get now would most likely have a strong stance for stay. The labour heartlands, as you put it, voted for leave.
What, pray tell, do you think would happen?
sure, coulda woulda shoulda. Alas, that is no longer on the table. You work with the hand you're dealt. Pragmatism, ho!
For fuck sake. Why does the nice guy have to be so unelectable?
He needs to go. I liked the guy (still do) but he has been completely feckless this whole campaign. Now more than ever Labour need a strong leader.
Miyamoto new Labour leader confirmed.
He's going to be looking for a blue ocean of new voters.Miyamoto new Labour leader confirmed.
A competent campaign would have made a huge difference. As of three weeks before the election, 46% of Labour voters did not know the party's position. Any leader running the same platform but with a more competent and more vocal campaign could have made a big difference.
I've seen a statistic thrown about that 70% of Labour members voted to remain. The papers and media with a right wing bias didn't cover his campaigning for the movement, and though he is at fault for not getting a better remain vote, he is not bad by any means. Legacy MPs from New Labour hate him, so this would have happened regardless. I will only ever vote for Labour in the next general election if Corbyn is the leader, as will many others who voted him in (though I'm not a party supporter myself).
Any leader running with a more competent and more vocal campaign could've stopped corbs from getting the job. Labour has no such leaders.
Thus, the current scenario. How would a leader that's strongly for stay fare will all those labour voters that went in exactly the opposite direction?
Paul WaughVerified account
‏@paulwaugh
Corbyn, asked by @jonsnowC4 tonight if he's resigning: "No, Im carrying on. Im making the case for unity," #c4news
So I get why people might find Corbyn uncharismatic, maybe even disagree with his views on military spending, but I seriously don't get the weird hate flung towards him. He's the first time Labour has swung even slightly left in a decade.https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/746393959077904384
I'm not voting for Labour again until he goes, how's that for unity you bungler.
An utterly inept, useless leader who did more harm to Labour than good. Get David Miliband back to lead the party as he should have originally done.
An utterly inept, useless leader who did more harm to Labour than good. Get David Miliband back to lead the party as he should have originally done.
Yes. I was saying this to folks today. The wheels starting to fall off for Labour when the unions made the massively stupid mistake of backing Ed over David.
So in reality. The reason why we are leaving the EU is due to the decisions of stupid union leaders back in 2010.
Dan Jarvis.
Finally news I care about!
Iraq war? Brown?
David would have been written off as Blair Jr in 5 minutes flat, in fact he already was before the leadership contest was over.
Rachel ReevesLike who
If you're going to try to push your party to the left, you have to actually package your policies and persona in a way that is electable. And, you know, not do what he did with the Remain campaign.
He wasn't interested in the nomination last year.Dan Jarvis.
Had to Google her and still don't really know anything about her positions on anything. Seems she's pretty right leaning though, so I mean, why bother? People aren't going to vote for Tory-lite, don't know why people think Labour should keep trying this losing strategy.Rachel Reeves
In the interest of fairness, the Yougov stats on votes per party (remain / leave):
CON: 43/57
LAB: 69/31
LDEM: 73/27
UKIP: 7/93
The narrative that Labour somehow caused Brexit seems really fishy to me and stinks of the right wing media trying to mend some fences in the conservative party. The is fact that the Conservative government and their media partners have spent 6 years demonising immigrants to cover the effects of austerity, then turned round with 5 weeks to go and consumed every media cycle with their infighting, ending up with less than half their vote out to support their leaders choice.
Also the MP who submitted this motion is the representative for Barking and Dagenham which voted 62/38 with a low (63%) turnout, among the worst performance of any Labour MP.
So I get why people might find Corbyn uncharismatic, maybe even disagree with his views on military spending, but I seriously don't get the weird hate flung towards him. He's the first time Labour has swung even slightly left in a decade.
Do that many people here read The Sun? Do people actually think he hates England?
He's sat on the fence this entire referendum he isn't a leader.
No. Just no. It's amazing how people literally copy media dogma, not much different from how populism on the right works.It's interesting how much Corbyn and Bernie Sanders have in common.
Two older liberals who seemed like they could provide a breath of fresh air in their parties, but ended up not pulling it off at all and just stuck around way past their usefulness. And now should probably piss off.
The one silver lining of this vote for me is that with immigration effectively made a non-issue, Labour finally have a chance to re-engage with post-industrial communities who simply haven't bought any labour line on immigration for the last 15 years, and outside of that massive issue, those people agree with Labour policies on pretty much everything else.
I don't think Corbyn has led well but I think he stands at the right point in the spectrum for what the country needs, so if they want him out to get someone who can make an actual media impact in then OK, but if all they have to replace him is more Tory-lite then they are just throwing away any chance they have of getting back what they've lost.