demosthenes
Member
This kinda says to me that they haven't found anything yet.
Or more likely, what they found has lead them to more and more.
This kinda says to me that they haven't found anything yet.
Only the Cloonmeister is fit to play Mueller
He just needs to put his Michael Clayton face on. I am Shiva, God of death.
This kinda says to me that they haven't found anything yet.
SAM WATERSTON
As Robert Mueller
Law & Motherfucking Order, BITCHES!!
SAM WATERSTON
As Robert Mueller
Law & Motherfucking Order, BITCHES!!
By the time a movie like this would roll around, that's actually a brilliant choice.
Congress =/= Democrats.
Trump is gonna order Rosenstein to fire Mueller then force Sessions to resign and order his new AG to fire both Rosenstein and Mueller.
I mean Schiff himself has to get a Republican to sign off on any activity he does in this investigation on his committee. Are you seriously suggesting he might not know precedings to re-establish what was originally an USC statute is going to require bi-partisan approval? Cmon dude.
No you definitely wouldn't pull on other threads as you poke around and discover things in the investigation. Nope definitely notBecause if original investigation thread surfaced shit you wouldn't pull on other threads for more shit to use.
Oh.... wait...
Being fired for refusing to fire Mueller would be a pretty good out for Sessions.Trump is gonna order Rosenstein to fire Mueller then force Sessions to resign and order his new AG to fire both Rosenstein and Mueller.
This kinda says to me that they haven't found anything yet.
This kinda says to me that they haven't found anything yet.
There's a line of succession firstBoth positions are subject to Senate confirmation. I would imagine that would be the first question.
Literally nothing about this investigation suggests that they haven't found anything.A legal expert as brought this up before. A wide broaching investigation can suggest they don't know exactly what they are looking for and are trying to cover all bases. All speculation of course.
It's so funny.
Yesterday: Trump warns Mueller.
Today: Mueller expands probe into Trump's business transactions.
Mueller is like...
I feel like we already knew this, but I guess it's good to reiterate after Trump's comments yesterday. It's not like the Special Counsel heard the interview last night and started investigating this morning. Sounds better that way I guess.
This kinda says to me that they haven't found anything yet.
LOL what did Trump say to him yesterday?
Asked if Mr. Muellers investigation would cross a red line if it expanded to look at his familys finances beyond any relationship to Russia, Mr. Trump said, I would say yes. He would not say what he would do about it. I think thats a violation. Look, this is about Russia.
He told Mueller to stay out of his finances.LOL what did Trump say to him yesterday?
Any move by Muellers team to pursue Trumps personal financial records comes as the bank continues to negotiate a settlement with the Department of Justice over its so-called mirror trading scheme, in which the banks former Moscow branch is alleged to have allowed $10bn to flow out of Russia. Democrats on Capitol Hill have been demanding answers about who might have benefited from the scheme.
Deutsche has been fined more than $6bn in connection to compliance failures since 2015.
According to an analysis by Bloomberg, Trump now owes Deutsche, his biggest creditor, about $300m. He has four large mortgages, all issued by Deutsches private bank. The loans are guaranteed against the presidents properties: a new deluxe hotel in Washington DCs Old Post Office building, just around the corner from the White House; his Chicago tower hotel; and the Trump National Doral Miami resort.
Thats not what I said?Literally nothing about this investigation suggests that they haven't found anything.
Both positions are subject to Senate confirmation. I would imagine that would be the first question.
That's what you got out of this? I'm saying he can say what he wants to say, but unless he gets...Conaway?...to sign off on it means jack shit. Cmon yourself.
An investigation isn't scattershot, you know. You don't just keep expanding the scope until you find something or give up.
The scope has expanded because they have reasonable belief that the things they've found thus far have led them towards that.
this is one of those times I wish I could be a fly on the wall in that building
Folks worried about Meuller being fired should know that there is absolutely zero chance he hasn't set up multiple layers of this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_man's_switch
Not to go off topic, but did Wikipedia recently change their layout? Looks much cleaner now, no borders anywhere.
Edit: Duh, it's the mobile version.
Kinda doesn't say that at all.
Though I think people also shouldn't be popping the champagne corks either. We get these little leaks in the press but really have no idea what is going on.
Thats not what I said?
I mean you did hop into a conversation where the guy I was quoting literally was saying that. Maybe not butt in next time if you don't want to be mistaken?
How long til Trump fires Mueller?
Tomorrow?
Unrelated, but you should install Wikiwand.
This kinda says to me that they haven't found anything yet.
So what happens when Trump fires Mueller?
It is known that position puts you on a sinking ship or immediately fired. Almost nobody who isn't completely suicidal would be willing to take it.More likely that Trump will fire Sessions and will try to install someone who will not recuse themselves than fire Mueller.
This kinda says to me that they haven't found anything yet.
So what happens when Drumpf fires Mueller?
Asked if Mr. Mueller's investigation would cross a red line if it expanded to look at his family's finances beyond any relationship to Russia, Mr. Trump said, ”I would say yes." He would not say what he would do about it. ”I think that's a violation. Look, this is about Russia."