• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

My permaban is eminent. Lol

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dared to say, "Why do liberals do nothing but hate? Don't they get tired of believeing that everyone is evil and in need of torture who does not want to dismantle the ENTIRE military and give everyone a free car?" in GA chat, and was banned. Banning from here will come next.

Sad, really, since anyone who studies history for, say, two minutes . . . realizes that every Communist who promises this always sets himself up as a tin god with an oppressive military . . . doing the exact same things the evil imerialist mad dogs of Capitalism supposedly do.

I believe Chairman Mau had about six or eight young girls that he would use for his own purpouses every night. The philosophy that Man is born a Blank Slate is basically evil, since if we are all blank slates with no such thing as a human nature rooted in Biology, or race, etc, then all of society must be controlled. Including art, science, and even the sexual behavior of the people in the dark oppressive Communism.

This philosophy led to persecution of the successful and those who produced more crops on their private family plots than on communal farms. And it made these regimes not just dictatorships but totalitarian dictatorships, which tried to control ever aspect of life.

There's your two minutes worth of a history lesson. It will not be met with much joy in this place.

See you in the funny papers, kids. :lol
 
Mike Works said:
And no one will remember you nor your views tomorrow.

I'm not even sure who he is or what his views are now, I just woke up naked in this thread with my mouth tasting of cheap alcohol.
 
It is always a sad day for me when an intelligent poster gets banned for being conservative.




Who wants ice cream? Its my birthday.
not at all sad
 
girls1l.jpg

KUNG FU GIRLS!!

last line of defense failed
 
trippingmartian said:
Parcher once again felt wrath of the gaf groupthink

We're trying to cut down on the noise ratio here and up the signal part.

With the kind of logic displayed by mr Parcher, there is no hope for him; as a joke character or as a retarded republican zombie with a persecution complex.
 
Man, sad I think. He's really cool on the other forum and he makes posts that make you giggle a little, cry a little, think a little and well, just orgasm a little. Overall, he's entertaing in the least IMO. Waste of a ban.
 
William Parcher said:
There's your two minutes worth of a history lesson.
Better that than a spelling lesson. It's "Mao", "imminent", "imperialist", and "purposes", respectively.

Here's a free TimTip™ fellas - if you want to try using big words, hit a friendly site or two before you make a complete fool of yourself. Hard to take an argument seriously (even that of a joke character) when it isn't framed correctly to begin with.

I won't be providing you with a ban, however. Someone else can take care of that. Sorry to disappoint. :D
 
Marconelly said:
WTF, I must have watched some censored version of that movie, not even knowingly...


If you watched the original American release(The Professional), then you did watch a censored version. I've never seen it, though, so I can't comment on whether that scene was taken out or not.
 
Onix said:
so all conservative viewpoints are squashed asap here?

land of the free ...
If "Why do liberals do nothing but hate? Don't they get tired of believeing that everyone is evil and in need of torture who does not want to dismantle the ENTIRE military and give everyone a free car?" is a "conservative viewpoint", then good riddance to all you jackoffs. Seriously.
 
demon said:
If "Why do liberals do nothing but hate? Don't they get tired of believeing that everyone is evil and in need of torture who does not want to dismantle the ENTIRE military and give everyone a free car?" is a "conservative viewpoint", then good riddance to all you jackoffs. Seriously.

I wasn't serious.

But now that you bring it up, I should point out I have seen several similarly 'intelligent' conservative-bashing threads with nary a ban in sight.

BTW - I wouldn't define myself as a conservative. I don't understand how anyone can fit into such narrow classifications. This black/white shit is crap.
 
Parcher is a fucking dumbass. I tried having a serious discussion with him over at OA, but it quickly devolved into one of his incoherent and blatantly racist rants. Douchbagus maximus. PEACE.

EDIT: Conservatives are in the minority here (probably b/c this place has fairly intelligent members), so they get outnumbered in a thread. But there's a difference between presenting a well-supported argument and being a raving lunatic. We've had many intelligent, though heated, debates on here over politics. The whole election run-up saw some really interesting threads crop up on a daily basis. Things get heated, but can still involve good discussion. But idiots should still be tossed overboard.
 
William Parcher said:
I dared to say, "Why do liberals do nothing but hate? Don't they get tired of believeing that everyone is evil and in need of torture who does not want to dismantle the ENTIRE military and give everyone a free car?" in GA chat, and was banned. Banning from here will come next.

Sad, really, since anyone who studies history for, say, two minutes . . . realizes that every Communist who promises this always sets himself up as a tin god with an oppressive military . . . doing the exact same things the evil imerialist mad dogs of Capitalism supposedly do.

I believe Chairman Mau had about six or eight young girls that he would use for his own purpouses every night. The philosophy that Man is born a Blank Slate is basically evil, since if we are all blank slates with no such thing as a human nature rooted in Biology, or race, etc, then all of society must be controlled. Including art, science, and even the sexual behavior of the people in the dark oppressive Communism.

This philosophy led to persecution of the successful and those who produced more crops on their private family plots than on communal farms. And it made these regimes not just dictatorships but totalitarian dictatorships, which tried to control ever aspect of life.

There's your two minutes worth of a history lesson. It will not be met with much joy in this place.

See you in the funny papers, kids. :lol


I don't agree with you on everything. I think being able to spell Imminent and correctly spell Mao would help your cause.

That said, The Liberal tendency to be extremely hostile to all opposing views, or rather the Liberal tendency to FIRST categorize everything into boxes, then start hating and shutting down their brains to people in the boxes they dislike is both dangerous to any liberal democracy and creates a kind of group think effect where only liberal solutions are perceived to be correct and considered.

I've been very criticial to the liberal bias on GAF, mainly because I see lots of people with otherwise good intentions being extremely ignorant and or bigoted about how they view the world.

Liberals are also very simplistic and naive in how they view the world. To them, it is very much like how the neo-cons view the world. There are good guys and bad guys and they (the liberals) are on a crusade to save the world. And when it comes to social issues, liberals tend to assume everyone out there, aka, The Public, are dumb stupid morons that need to be 'enlightened' and led to the right way by heavy handed liberal policies. It's no surprise that so many communist and socialist revolutions have gone from being fighting for the people to being authoritarian regimes dictating how people should live, what they should watch and hate etc.

I think life, politics and society are far too complex to be saved by this kind of mentality on any side of the political spectrum. I have a rant for the neo-cons as well, but I post that on more conservative boards.

Demon said:
BTW - I wouldn't define myself as a conservative. I don't understand how anyone can fit into such narrow classifications. This black/white shit is crap.

That speaks to the liberal tendency of putting people into boxes. basically, if you don't agree with some hairbrained liberal policy, you're automatically their enemy and an arch-consrvative. Even if the person who criticize them are simply libertarians who oppose too much meddling or political centrists.

It also speaks to the simplistic world view of "with us" or "against us." that the liberals claim to hate when it comes out of the mouth of a neo-con president, but they practice day in and day out.
 
Deku said:
That said, The Liberal tendency to be extremely hostile to all opposing views, or rather the Liberal tendency to FIRST categorize everything into boxes, then start hating and shutting down their brains to people in the boxes they dislike is both dangerous to any liberal democracy and creates a kind of group think effect where only liberal solutions are perceived to be correct and considered.

This is actually a human tendency. It's hardly unique to liberals, and it hardly applies to all liberals.
 
Trident said:
This is actually a human tendency. It's hardly unique to liberals, and it hardly applies to all liberals.

It's enlightening to see an admission that liberals really do behave this way as I was expecting denial to the max. As I've said before. Left-Right debates are often as pointless as Coke vs. Pepsi since the underlying product is the same, right down to behavior and world views. The people are just pissed because they want their brand to win.

As for the "not everyone is A" defense, it can be applied to all discussion. But the OP was hardly discussing about an individual so the discussion is about group behavior. If you're a free thinker and happen to be a liberal, good for you.
 
Deku said:
As for the "not everyone is A" defense, it can be applied to all discussion. But the OP was hardly discussing about an individual so the discussion is about group behavior. If you're a free thinker and happen to be a liberal, good for you.

Well, you defined it as "The Liberal tendency." The fact is it isn't the liberal tendency. It's a tendency in most people that manifests itself in several ways, including political views (all political views).
 
Trident said:
Well, you defined it as "The Liberal tendency." The fact is it isn't the liberal tendency. It's a tendency in most people that manifests itself in several ways, including political views (all political views).
WINNER! Quoted for truth, accuracy and the 'murican way. PEACE.
 
Trident said:
Well, you defined it as "The Liberal tendency." The fact is it isn't the liberal tendency. It's a tendency in most people that manifests itself in several ways, including political views (all political views).

All political views? I was dancing around the point since I didn't want to bring stuff up that's not relevant but Libertarians are quite tolerant of opposing viewpoints just because the basis of libertarian ideology is the idea of personal liberty to believe and do anything.

Liberalism as is practiced, is quite different from all political ideology. And I'd say there's only one similar political ideology in democratic systems and they are the neo-conservatives.

So no, i have to disagree.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom