DKehoe
Member
Trailer looks rad but man… Napoleon must be turning in his grave. I usually don’t mind but everyone talking English here seems like the ultimate insult.
Last edited:
Trailer looks rad but man… Napoleon must be turning in his grave. I usually don’t mind but everyone talking English here seems like the ultimate insult.
While I get it.. I think you'd benefit from just letting go of that aspect.
(but I get it)
I wouldn’t want French Accents either. Makes no sense as here everyone would have to have it.
Sheeeit he dunked on my post years before I made it
I'll be very upset if this doesn't get a Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos physical release.
That would be leaving a lot of money on the table then.I'd imagine it'll be locked forever on Apple TV. Is there an example of an "apple original" getting a physical release?
Sean Bean/Sharpe cameo???
Spielberg is adapting Stanley Kubrick’s Napoleon screenplay into a 7 part limited series for HBO, too, at least.Looks amazing! But how the hell are they going to compress his life in one movie?
i was gonna say if kubrick's ghost isn't directing this then fuhgeddaboudit. that said at least we got a taste of what could have been with barry lyndon.Spielberg is adapting Stanley Kubrick’s Napoleon screenplay into a 7 part limited series for HBO, too, at least.
Spielberg is adapting Stanley Kubrick’s Napoleon screenplay into a 7 part limited series for HBO, too, at least.
False. The Counsellor is a great movie. You will learn this hard won truth only when you rewatch it.Counselor is probably the worst movie I have ever seen.
My only problem with the movie was that when the third act starts, they title it 'The Truth' According to Lady whatsherface. And then underline the TRUTH as if to say thats the objective truth. I couldnt believe veteran writers and directors would make a mistake like that. The movie would've worked really well if they hadn't taken sides and let the audience decide. Obviously the audience in todays society wouldve sided with the woman, but they didnt need to literally underline that point lol. Apparently Ben Affleck and Matt Damon wrote the first two acts based on research done by a historian, and they brought in a female writer to basically make up the final act because the historian couldnt find anything in the records from her perspective. Definitely ideologically driven. That was their biggest mistake and then they wondered why the movie flopped after the backlash against the MeToo movement being abused by some women.Watched The Last Duel tonight in response to the Napoleon trailer, to see how Ridley Scott is holding up as a filmmaker.
Unfortunately ideologically driven. Despite initially going for a subjective POV, it then leans into a men are bad perspective instead of sticking to the history where we don’t know who was telling the truth in the incident. Without nuance there is nothing interesting to the story, and by the end every single character is unlikeable. Doesn’t deserve to use Rashomon as an influence.
I’ll go read some more history books instead of getting excited for this one.
Ah, interesting details, thanks. Yeah, the first two acts are alright, was curious to see how it would continue to develop, and Matt Damon's character and Adam Driver's character take turns being relatively sympathetic (except for Driver's POV of the bedroom scene, which isn't much different from Comer's POV--bad times in both cases). But then, as you say, the "TRUTH" title screen appears and it becomes a completely different story where all the men in the entire cast are unambiguously, one-dimensionally evil.My only problem with the movie was that when the third act starts, they title it 'The Truth' According to Lady whatsherface. And then underline the TRUTH as if to say thats the objective truth. I couldnt believe veteran writers and directors would make a mistake like that. The movie would've worked really well if they hadn't taken sides and let the audience decide. Obviously the audience in todays society wouldve sided with the woman, but they didnt need to literally underline that point lol. Apparently Ben Affleck and Matt Damon wrote the first two acts based on research done by a historian, and they brought in a female writer to basically make up the final act because the historian couldnt find anything in the records from her perspective. Definitely ideologically driven. That was their biggest mistake and then they wondered why the movie flopped after the backlash against the MeToo movement being abused by some women.
The final duel was amazing though. You gotta give him that.
Well allegedly the guy doing his autopsy took his penis so he’s kinda gotta get something on his end of the deal.Napoleon’s Tomb
it’s an elaborate imposing place.
Well allegedly the guy doing his autopsy took his penis so he’s kinda gotta get something on his end of the deal.
That would be leaving a lot of money on the table then.
I wonder how long it will take until mankind will watch a movie about Hitler in a positive light tho lol.
Hey, Qu'est-ce qu'on a fait au Bon Dieu ? is pretty dope. Also racist.As a Frenchman, I'm so happy to see this because our country is only capable of doing family dramas or stupid and racist comedies.
Thank fucking god.
Even with Ridley Scott having more duds as of late, this one looks enticing enough to watch in theatres. I'm in.
27 million views. Not bad at all.
Is this a new trend for historical films?
Or is it simply the impact of Napoleon, or even the choice of Joaquin Phoenix that intrigues?
Watched The Last Duel tonight in response to the Napoleon trailer, to see how Ridley Scott is holding up as a filmmaker.
Unfortunately ideologically driven. Despite initially going for a subjective POV, it then leans into a men are bad perspective instead of sticking to the history where we don’t know who was telling the truth in the incident. Without nuance there is nothing interesting to the story, and by the end every single character is unlikeable. Doesn’t deserve to use Rashomon as an influence.
When I first heard of it I assumed it was a mini series. I agree that it would have worked much better that way.It looks the dog's bollocks, but I'm not 100% convinced.
Ridley Scott is probably one of the most hit or miss directors on the planet, and his historical stuff is normally woefully inaccurate.
Also, I don't see how you can squeeze the life of Napoleon and a majority of his major battles into a single film. This would have worked better as a mini series.