Wait what? Lost contact?
Wait what? Lost contact?
Troll? What are you talking about?Wait what? Lost contact?
Odyssey roll should be starting soon.
Don't expect anything. You might get lucky with a picture 12 hours from now or whenever the press conference is. I'm just hoping that they get a signal after it lands.
What always blows my mind is that we have 2 satellites orbiting Mars, that is fucking awesome, i love the USA.
1. I'm in for the haul.
2. It's a real shame that this is the best PR I've seen NASA ever do (except for their HUBBLE roll-outs) in my lifetime.
3. If for some reason this does fail, I can foresee a movement that it's time to get humans out there. You know, rather than the converse ("we can't send humans if we can land a robot!").
What always blows my mind is that we have 2 satellites orbiting Mars, that is fucking awesome, i love the USA.
Two very much aging satellites.
I'm going to start that as soon as the Cruise stage separates.
That or this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COYRxf13tIg
Heck it's 7 minutes, I can play both!
Yeah. I'm thinking only happy thoughts.NASA TV just had a little animation explaining that we very well may not hear anything for three days.
9,500 mph and rising. Gravity at work?
Blowing up rocks with lasers!What type of instruments are on Curiosity? What SCIENCE are they going to do with it?
Three. Mars Express should be there somewhere.
What type of instruments are on Curiosity? What SCIENCE are they going to do with it?
I have to say that this is the craziest way to land a rover the size of a small car. I don't care how NASA spins the landing approach they came up with, it is a risky proposition considering this mission has cost at the very least 2.5 billions dollars.
What type of instruments are on Curiosity? What SCIENCE are they going to do with it?
What type of instruments are on Curiosity? What SCIENCE are they going to do with it?
The guy is saying we may get a picture not long after the landing, if everything goes well.
Two very much aging satellites.
Haha, I'm anticipating a lot of "That's it?!" after the landing. People are going to be so disappointed.
Spin? Lol. How else should they do it?
They could have still have done what they did with spirit and opportunity which was inflate huge balls around them, would have been safer approach as it would have only hit the ground 4 miles per hour faster then this one. A rocket assisted descent is the riskiest way to go about this.
My little home made solar system simulator showing Gale Crater setting with respect to earth a few moments ago. I checked just as they said it on Nasa TV and when I saw my simulators Gale Crater setting just as they said it should be I let out a little "whoop!"
Amazes me we're landing it out of direct LoS to Earth, go humans!
They could have still have done what they did with spirit and opportunity which was inflate huge balls around them, would have been safer approach as it would have only hit the ground 4 miles per hour faster then this one. A rocket assisted descent is the riskiest way to go about this.
I know your joking but unless you can transmit faster than the speed of light, it ain't happening.Have we seen a live landing since the 60's lunar landings? CONSPIRACY!!! PEACE.
No they couldn't. The rover is too heavy. You know, they've discussed this a lot. You would think before attempting to call their engineering into question you'd take the time to do a little research.