Does NASA have any major projects on the horizon on par with The Curiosity rover?
I guess the James Webb Space Telescope is a big deal. Are there any others?
Does NASA have any major projects on the horizon on par with The Curiosity rover?
I guess the James Webb Space Telescope is a big deal. Are there any others?
New Horizon should be arriving at Pluto in 2015. Other than that, I don't think there are any others.
Does NASA have any major projects on the horizon on par with The Curiosity rover?
they can't really say until they have a new budget to work with
I just spent some time clicking around NASA and JPL's sites. Here are some lists, though I really can't be spending time on this while I'm at work:New Horizon should be arriving at Pluto in 2015. Other than that, I don't think there are any others.
I thought it was clear that it was cynicism.
Anyway, for the next Mars exploration, we should kickstart a new 8k 3D camera. And get James Cameron involved for the film material.
Does NASA have any major projects on the horizon on par with The Curiosity rover?
I guess the James Webb Space Telescope is a big deal. Are there any others?
Excellent!4th Rock from the Sun,
New Challenger Approaching:
Curiosity.
NASA is currently evaluating several options for a big mission in the 2020-2025 time frame. One is a mission to explore the moons of Jupiter, particularly Europa, which is believed to have large sub-surface water oceans. Another proposal would send a "hot air" balloon into the atmosphere of Titan, a moon of Saturn and one of the very few bodies in the solar system with a thick atmosphere.
Cannot express how nerve-racking it was sitting there with a room full of delegates, watching Mission Control live when the first signal of EDL sequence initiation arrived, 14min prior to scheduled landing - knowing that by that time Curiosity had already landed safely or crashed on Mars (14min for signal to arrive to Earth)
I recall one of the landing site specialists announce that For 7 min it was pretty much a Schrödinger's Rover situation, both dead and alive on the Surface of Mars until further confirmation.
Wow. What a historic milestone.. I still have goosebumps.
EDIT:
Raw goodness: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/
It landed at 1am EST. I slept for a couple hours and woke up for it. Im not missing out on history.Awww, couldn't NASA have gone all NBC-Olympics mode, and delayed the landing until primetime on the east coast? It was 3 or 4am here when it landed, just finding out about this now.
was great watching this live and them celebrating.
Also had a feeling non-American gaffers would whine about something.
What exactly makes this mars landing so significant compared to the other ones?
Don't paint all non-American gaffers with dat brush.
I set my alarm for 4am and cried manly tears when she landed. No whining here.
What exactly makes this mars landing so significant compared to the other ones?
I feel like this is the wrong tact for NASA to take if they're looking to garner excitement towards the space program. In this hyper-politicized world they're operating in, tons of people will earnestly respond, "My $7.00 is not worth a moment of excitement for you." Sad but true.Charles Elachi, director of the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which operates Curiosity and many of the other planetary missions, said it was well worth the money and compared the night’s exhilaration to an adventure movie.
“This movie cost you less than seven bucks per American citizen, and look at the excitement we got,” Dr. Elachi said.
What exactly makes this mars landing so significant compared to the other ones?
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/images/EDL-full.jpgMars Science Laboratory will serve as an entrée to the next decade of Mars exploration. It represents a huge step in Mars surface science and exploration capability because it will:
-demonstrate the ability to land a very large, heavy rover to the surface of Mars (which could be used for a future Mars Sample Return mission that would collect rocks and soils and send them back to Earth for laboratory analysis)
-demonstrate the ability to land more precisely in a 20-kilometer (12.4-mile) landing circle
-demonstrate long-range mobility on the surface of the red planet (5-20 kilometers or about 3 to 12 miles) for the collection of more diverse samples and studies.
Not to mention the insane degree of difficulty in landing this thing.A different and interesting site. It will last for ages and be able to cover a lot of ground, and there's lots of fancy equipment onboard.
I guess your question has already been answered but I want to keep posting stuff.What exactly makes this mars landing so significant compared to the other ones?
Great night last night.
Also had an opportunity to prune some bad apples from the Facebook friends list this morning. A few people decided it was a good time to display their ignorance and made me realize they're probably not people I would associate with.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISmWAyQxqqsNot to mention the insane degree of difficulty in landing this thing.
If you want to know why people are so amazed that they were able to pull it off go watch 7 minutes of terror on YouTube.
From the NY Times article:
I feel like this is the wrong tact for NASA to take if they're looking to garner excitement towards the space program. In this hyper-politicized world they're operating in, tons of people will earnestly respond, "My $7.00 is not worth a moment of excitement for you." Sad but true.
What exactly makes this mars landing so significant compared to the other ones?
New Horizon should be arriving at Pluto in 2015. Other than that, I don't think there are any others.
Is there a link somewhere to a recording of the livestream as it was happening? Was there a video attached to the actual rover showing it landing?
Was there a video attached to the actual rover showing it landing?