Heck, do we even know if mars has caves?
yep.
FUUUUUUUUUUUCK!!Martian cave exploration is an awsome prospect. I wonder if it will be the mining companies that finance the first expeditions. I think the above cave photo comes from this crater:
It looks like there is a large cavity down there. I'm seeing the whole crater like it could collapse from the cracks along the inside of the rim.
OoohHi Resolution photo from MARDI is back as well. Imagine that entire landing video in this resolution:
I think there is a range of expected environments underground. The biochem lab on Curiosity will help better understand the whole martian environment.
A lander on Mars Express called Beagle 2 will also carry the first robotic mole. Mimicking the behavior of the small furry earth-bound creatures that burrow into the ground, robotic moles will drill underground by pulverizing rock and soil, avoiding the need for a complex drill stem. Beagle 2's mole will only have the ability to penetrate less than a meter (less than 3 feet) below the surface.
Can someone explain why this landing has been so widely lauded by the media and public? While I think it's fucking awesome, I don't recall the media and general public ever being so enthusiastic about anything related to mars. So it seems odd that everyone is singing praise this time.
Aside from the whole booster landing, is there a significant difference between this mission and previous rover missions that I've missed out on?
Too sad for words. Must look forward learning from previous setbacks!But beagle 2 failed on entry
dat skycrane.
basically its an extremely complicated landing that somehow went sucessfully
This question gets asked on every page. I think these are the primary reasons that the general public has gotten excited about the mission:Can someone explain why this landing has been so widely lauded by the media and public? While I think it's fucking awesome, I don't recall the media and general public ever being so enthusiastic about anything related to mars. So it seems odd that everyone is singing praise this time.
Aside from the whole booster landing, is there a significant difference between this mission and previous rover missions that I've missed out on?
This question has been answered a thousand times, especially in the last couple of pages of this thread.Can someone explain why this landing has been so widely lauded by the media and public? While I think it's fucking awesome, I don't recall the media and general public ever being so enthusiastic about anything related to mars. So it seems odd that everyone is singing praise this time.
Aside from the whole booster landing, is there a significant difference between this mission and previous rover missions that I've missed out on?
Hi Resolution photo from MARDI is back as well. Imagine that entire landing video in this resolution:
They are already pretty sure Mars had substantial amounts of liquid water on its surface a long time ago. They've found many mineral deposits that, as far as we know on Earth, only form in the presence of liquid water. They've also seen clear areas of water erosion along with dried river channels and deltas. They've also recently found a lot of water ice below the surface that melts during the Martian summer and sometimes seeps up to the surface. (That link takes you to a clip from the press conference where they announce this, with animations from HiRISE of water melting and running down a hillside. Very cool.)
There already is lots of evidence to suggest that Mars once had surface water. Currently the temp is too low and the atmosphere too thin to allow for liquid water on the surface, but there is evidence for frozen water at the caps and under the ground.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_on_Mars
Curiosity will only further build on the current evidence and is well equipped to possibly detect signs of past life.
The mast cam can also take video. The first time we'll ever have video beamed back from another world.
720p video @ 10fps. Real video, not animations of images.By video do you mean first video of 24fps? Because i remember this amazing footage from spirit. Dustdevil on mars: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bY59iEWeMFw
720p video @ 10fps. Real video, not animations of images.
720p video @ 10fps. Real video, not animations of images.
Well... too bad that will take MONTHS to get to us...
That panorama is very nice. But really guys, are you going to tell me you haven't seen any of the countless and beautiful panoramas that Spirit, Opportunity and even Pathfinder took? Shame on you!
They will be trying to increase data transfer bandwidth to about 2mb per second eventually.
If there's one disappointment to this project is we won't get any amazing pictures of Curiosity doing it's thing, as there's no base platform to picture it with.
They will be trying to increase data transfer bandwidth to about 2mb per second eventually.
I'd suggest, DrForrester puts a link to an article or two, or this video: What sets Curiosity apart from other Mars rovers? into the OP so we can just direct people there.
So how does this work? I wasn't aware of my ignorance until now, but unless there's a communication protocol I'm unaware of, this is all occurring via radio? How are images/video/data in general sent this way?
Hi Resolution photo from MARDI is back as well. Imagine that entire landing video in this resolution:
6fps is the max that MARDI can take, I believe. The mastcam can do around 10fps.I heard 6fps?
Briefing started.
That panorama IS from Sprit/Opportunity. There haven't been any panoramas from Curiosity yet.
But beagle 2 failed on entry
So how does this work? I wasn't aware of my ignorance until now, but unless there's a communication protocol I'm unaware of, this is all occurring via radio? How are images/video/data in general sent this way?
Curiosity has tools to try to solve that methane mystery!As far as extant life on Mars, there's still the source of the Mars Farts to account for. Not saying it's from microorganisms, but it's intriguing.
They found the tungsten balance weights.
That's the official line, yes