Care to elaborate, or are you too busy throwing a hissyfit over "teh Revahlushun"?Your tag suits you.
Care to elaborate, or are you too busy throwing a hissyfit over "teh Revahlushun"?Your tag suits you.
Dreamfixx said:Care to elaborate, or are you too busy throwing a hissyfit over "teh Revahlushun"?
Odnetnin said:/sneakily grabs uniform back. I can wait. Last night too much for my fragile heart. Sleep is recuperating. I feel much better. Like Snake
pcostabel said:Enough said![]()
There isn't always a Spaceworld, it's been cancelled before.
Raoul Duke said:I'm heartily amused by all of the people playing the "they didn't show their cards yet, so let's not get upset by what we don't know!" card.
Well, we do know some things. Let's list them, shall we?
-The Rev should be 2-3 times more powerful than GC. That is less powerful than X360 and far less powerful than the ONE CONSOLE FUTURE. Too bad about that, New Sexy.
-They didn't show their gimmi- I mean "Revolutionary Aspect" of the console because they're afraid of the comepetition stealing it. :lol Come off it. X360 launches in six months, PS3 in roughly a year. That's plenty of time to steal something so "revolutionary". Riiiight.
-The system is one big retread box. Or little retread box. Yeah. Awesome, Nintendo is using it's past success to sell more future systems!
-Mario Party 7.
-SSB at launch, new Mario, Zelda and Metroid in development.
-3rd iteration of the GBA in 4 years.
-Rev is going online... one gen after the competition.
So we know all of that. Also that you can play with Dogs and whatever the fuck Electroplankton is. Shrewd use of your time, boys.
My point is this: do these seem like the actions of a console maker that is trying to "innovate" the industry? Or more like the actions of someone trying to rest on past laurels and shovel gimmicks out there because they don't want to get on board with what the industry has become? Gaming and gamers don't want a Revolution. They want EVOLUTION. Sony and MS understand that. Nintendon't. And that's why you guys should turn in your stupid fanboy unitards, not because footage wasn't shown.
Yes, well, it's been established that you have no taste. But Mario & Luigi was one sweet, sweet game. Too bad Nintendo is putting it on the worst gaming system on the face of the earth, or I would definitely pick one up.demi said:I can't wait for Mario Luigi DS![]()
Raoul Duke said:I'm heartily amused by all of the people playing the "they didn't show their cards yet, so let's not get upset by what we don't know!" card.
Well, we do know some things. Let's list them, shall we?
-The Rev should be 2-3 times more powerful than GC. That is less powerful than X360 and far less powerful than the ONE CONSOLE FUTURE. Too bad about that, New Sexy.
-They didn't show their gimmi- I mean "Revolutionary Aspect" of the console because they're afraid of the comepetition stealing it. :lol Come off it. X360 launches in six months, PS3 in roughly a year. That's plenty of time to steal something so "revolutionary". Riiiight.
-The system is one big retread box. Or little retread box. Yeah. Awesome, Nintendo is using it's past success to sell more future systems!
-Mario Party 7.
-SSB at launch, new Mario, Zelda and Metroid in development.
-3rd iteration of the GBA in 4 years.
-Rev is going online... one gen after the competition.
So we know all of that. Also that you can play with Dogs and whatever the fuck Electroplankton is. Shrewd use of your time, boys.
My point is this: do these seem like the actions of a console maker that is trying to "innovate" the industry? Or more like the actions of someone trying to rest on past laurels and shovel gimmicks out there because they don't want to get on board with what the industry has become? Gaming and gamers don't want a Revolution. They want EVOLUTION. Sony and MS understand that. Nintendon't. And that's why you guys should turn in your stupid fanboy unitards, not because footage wasn't shown.
Raoul Duke said:Yes, well, it's been established that you have no taste.