Support NeoGAF

[Lane_Myer]

this is someone i know from another forum. i just wanted to pass along his "work" in a little bit of free publicity

http://www.8x10proofs.com/

here are some examples of what hes capable of :

 

[Doth Togo]

Tig bitties are cool.

 

[sprsk]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[shuri]

Looks like regular porn.

 

[Late Stage Marxist]

 

[Dujour]

Daniel Webster: So all I need to be an artist is this here camera?
The Devil: Yes sir.



















Serafitian fact: The percentage of photography that can be seen as a photographer's own art is like, 7%.

 

[Mike Works]

Those aren't great photos at all. Doesn't show off any talent whatsoever. OH HE'S A GREAT PHOTOGRAPHER BECAUSE HE CAN TAKE AVERAGE PHOTOS OF BEAUTIFUL WOMEN!

 

[Particle Physicist]

Those aren't great photos at all. Doesn't show off any talent whatsoever. OH HE'S A GREAT PHOTOGRAPHER BECAUSE HE CAN TAKE AVERAGE PHOTOS OF BEAUTIFUL WOMEN!

but... but.. this pic is so artistically creative.

 

[demon]

Lane Meyer you are a mediocre photographer at best buy I envy the many big-beautiful-boobied bitches you somehow convince to allow you to photograph.

 

[olimario]

Where is the headroom?

 

[Warm Machine]

I'm seeing some incredibly dull framing and composition, standard lighting with far too much high key and fill as well as some very standard and decaf posing.

 

[Lane_Myer]

Lane Meyer you are a mediocre photographer at best buy I envy the many big-beautiful-boobied bitches you somehow convince to allow you to photograph.

if you actually read what i wrote youd see that this is someone else's work, not mine. nice try.

"It's called reading. Top to bottom, left to right, group words to form sentences. Take Tylenol for headaches. Midol for cramps."

as for the rest of you, this was just a psuedo-post to show some hot women in hot clothes to break up the day. yes, theyre hot. no, you couldnt do better.

 

[Warm Machine]

Serafitian fact: The percentage of photography that can be seen as a photographer's own art is like, 7%.

Photography, when taking a picture is all about composition, the moment, lighting, and settign the aperature and shutter. Beyond that there is the technical prowess required in the printing stage.

Just look at the differences in the photography in film over the last 4 decades. Movies like Blade Runner showed what great color film cinematography could look like. Before the late 70's and early 80's the majority of films looked like episodes of M.A.S.H or Quincy. shot eye level with flat, dull, and ugly lighting.

There is more art in photography than you think.

 

[Incognito]

if you actually read what i wrote youd see that this is someone else's work, not mine. nice try.

"It's called reading. Top to bottom, left to right, group words to form sentences. Take Tylenol for headaches. Midol for cramps."

as for the rest of you, this was just a psuedo-post to show some hot women in hot clothes to break up the day. yes, theyre hot. no, you couldnt do better.

:lol :lol

starting off strong.

 

[DJ Demon J]

if you actually read what i wrote youd see that this is someone else's work, not mine. nice try.

"It's called reading. Top to bottom, left to right, group words to form sentences. Take Tylenol for headaches. Midol for cramps."

as for the rest of you, this was just a psuedo-post to show some hot women in hot clothes to break up the day. yes, theyre hot. no, you couldnt do better.

:lol AWESOME demon OWNED.

 

[Doth Togo]

:lol

 

[Lane_Myer]

starting off strong.

nah, just a lil flexing.

 

[Grizzlyjin]

I like women, girls, gals, ladies, and babes.

 

[bishoptl]

"mmmmm diddly!"

 

[belgurdo]

TITTIES.

 

[Mike Works]

as for the rest of you, this was just a psuedo-post to show some hot women in hot clothes to break up the day.

Perhaps you shouldn't have titled this thread "Need a professional photographer?" then.

 

[sprsk]

Photography, when taking a picture is all about composition, the moment, lighting, and settign the aperature and shutter. Beyond that there is the technical prowess required in the printing stage.

now now now, lets not pigeonhole here. To some people printing can be the art, some people dont put any time into printing other than making the tones right. Photography isnt always about the moment, or the lighting, or setting.

These photos are boring because of

A. they service the subject more than the artist (and im sure he knows that and prolly doesnt care. hes probably getting paid after all.)
B. The mood in almost every photo is the same. Which is to be expected of this type of photography. Models smiling with some "action pose".



There are one or two pictures in there that arent boring on the site though.

 

[Particle Physicist]

Perhaps you shouldn't have titled this thread "Need a professional photographer?" then.

yeah, he sho0uld have titled it::



"titty titty batitty nitty!"


or


"Need a professional tittyographer? Check out his work (you wont be disappointed)..."

 

[demon]

:lol AWESOME demon OWNED.

Mr. Biceps told me I can't read....I just got PWN3D!

 

[nitewulf]

i dont know if these photos were even meant to be art. most studio shots arent really artistic or anything, you pay the photographer, he tells you to pose, he has good lighting set up, and he takes a nice picture of you.
i did like clip's gfs ass shot, against the wall, very erotic.
artistic though, these are not, not even erotica.

 

[nitewulf]

this is good:

WHAT!

 

[Doth Togo]

Two words for all of you:
















Deez nuts.

 

[Dujour]

Photography, when taking a picture is all about composition, the moment, lighting, and settign the aperature and shutter. Beyond that there is the technical prowess required in the printing stage.

Just look at the differences in the photography in film over the last 4 decades. Movies like Blade Runner showed what great color film cinematography could look like. Before the late 70's and early 80's the majority of films looked like episodes of M.A.S.H or Quincy. shot eye level with flat, dull, and ugly lighting.

There is more art in photography than you think.

I think there's a lot in photography, it's just that usually if a photo's taken of a beautiful thing that in itself is art, the photo gets the credit. To me, art takes hours, days, weeks, not a fraction of a second. And when it does happen, it's rare.

 

[sc0la]

Two words for all of you:

You guys want a free pizza?

Spoiler

PIZZA DEEZ'NUTS

 

[sprsk]

I think there's a lot in photography, it's just that usually if a photo's taken of a beautiful thing that in itself is art, the photo gets the credit. To me, art takes hours, days, weeks, not a fraction of a second. And when it does happen, it's rare.

So, if someone takes pictures of one subject for weeks and months and finally gets the perfect picture, would it make your head explode?


Taking a picture of a beautiful thing is not in itself art. It's the opposite of art. It's expected, its dull, its fake. There is more to art than aesthetics.

 

[nitewulf]

Taking a picture of a beautiful thing is not in itself art. It's the opposite of art. It's expected, its dull, its fake. There is more to art than aesthetics.

exactly, though i do take pictures of pretty objects/places/scenes...but thats to just appreciate the beauty of it. photographic art itself is more than that.

 

[Dujour]

No, sporks, because it'd just be proving that it's rare. I don't expect many people to agree as it's my own opinion. Everyone views art differently. Sorry for a half-assed reply, long day :/