j^aws
Member
Timedog said:You followed with "if it does, it's a stupid design or it's faulty."
Which is basically a reiteration of the quote I posted in my last post, but with some implications explicitly outlined. I'm sorry bro, you said it, and it's plain as day. If there are multiple layers of sub-text and figurative subtlety to that statement then you'll have to outline that for me, because the meaning of that statement seems very self-evident and very self-contained.
1. Lookup what should means.
2. You truncated the quote and changed the meaning.
3. From the previous page:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31642148&postcount=16790
"Basically, oscillation until stationary (function of amplitude and frequency) about the centre (centre != neutral), when the stick is released to move freely from an extreme position. That's how I see it.
And relation to switch engage distances shouldn't be relevant, because a freely oscillating stick shouldn't hit any other switches (accidental inputs)."
accidental inputs -> stupid
I also mentioned on the previous page a stock JLF shouldn't be doing what you described because it sounds like a faulty stick.
-> faulty
There's no contradiction.