If you don't like the weird numbers then:
1st - 480
2nd - 290
3rd - 190
4th - 80
You dirty communist.I just don't agree with first place getting such a big cut lol. In my ideal situation, all playoff teams split the cut #socialism!
Why? The reason I suggested a 3rd WR was to devalue RBs, they're too powerful scoringwise. Using PPR and Flexing RBs just keeps the RB imbalance.If we add a 3rd WR spot, we have to use PPR and maybe even add RB to flex
... bottom barrel? You can get productive WRs in the 12th round, I'm saying there is no bottom-feeding at all with that position. By spreading out as many as 4 good WRs you force more research on a deep position, which makes the position as important by volume, as opposed to the RB position.I guess you're right about flexing RBs but I don't see how scraping the bottom of the barrel for WRs devalues RBs without PPR.
Ah well... I suppose I was long past due to have a bad fantasy season. And even minimal effort should be enough to take down the Shirtless league.
New personal goals for my fantasy season: beat Frankman once, beat Dinner Out once, do decent in the Shirtless league, suck everywhere else (but hopefully not my work league - they'll really rub it in).
I've said 1st should get at least half. I proposed 47.5% as a compromise.Personally, I think 1st place should get more. a lot more.
I've said 1st should get at least half. I proposed 47.5% as a compromise.
Any update on the final settings?
According to the current votes, looks like PPR + WR3 are in. I will review tonight
See? Another vote in the PPR haters camp.It should be
ppr
OR
wr3
Both combined will devalue RBs TOO much.
whatNo More Rivers removed New Orleans Phoenix from league
43 minutes ago
Holy crap I finally reached the 50 Mock Drafts Medal...
My brain hurts.
I like ppr but would suggest making it smaller like .25 only cause if .5 turns out to be dominant it would be too late to make a change.
As for another WR slot, is this another in addition to the current qb, 2 rb, 2 wr, 1 te, 1 wr/te slot?
This is a good idea since we haven't used it before in this league. More thoughts?
Yes, it'd be a 3rd WR in addition to the current settings. I was originally for it but I am totally against it now lol
With 4 spots on the bench it really isn't.In a 16 team league a 3rd WR and a flex just strikes me as overkill. We'd all be scraping the bottom of the barrel at that point. One or the other imo, not both.
I'm just going to make an executive decision on this. No WR3 and 0.25 PPR #dictatorship!