The Frankman
Banned
Ok my 2nd idea is a clump of ideas.
Roster Positions: QB, WR, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, W/R/T, K, DEF, BN, BN, BN, BN, IR Spot
Playoff Reseeding: NO!
Waiver Type: FAAB Continual Waivers - Waiver claims are processed in waiver priority order and each successful claim moves a manager to the end of the waiver priority list.
I think the wave of the future to eliminate fluky weeks is add more spots that a offense can run, in this case an extra WR spot (Imagine 4 WR/2 RB/TE/, 3 WR/ 2 RB/ 2 TE, or 3 WR/3 RB/TE). It makes people actually have to research the most plentiful commodity (WR), and there's nothing like winning your week due to that scrub WR proving dividends. Yahoo! Friends and Family League uses a similar format. With roster positions currently I still saw over the year tons of people ignoring the value of the WR position in the flex, teams would carry in some cases 3 TEs! So I say cut off an extra bench spot to comp for the extra position spot. Reduces hoarding even more.
No Playoff Reseeding is self explanatory
Initially I thought that using Puddles' FAAB w/ Reverse order of standings tiebreak setting might be better, but I like the continuous one better because it's more random (sense a pattern here). In the NEL you knew if you tied bids the worse team would get that player, no such luck with this system.
Roster Positions: QB, WR, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, W/R/T, K, DEF, BN, BN, BN, BN, IR Spot
Playoff Reseeding: NO!
Waiver Type: FAAB Continual Waivers - Waiver claims are processed in waiver priority order and each successful claim moves a manager to the end of the waiver priority list.
I think the wave of the future to eliminate fluky weeks is add more spots that a offense can run, in this case an extra WR spot (Imagine 4 WR/2 RB/TE/, 3 WR/ 2 RB/ 2 TE, or 3 WR/3 RB/TE). It makes people actually have to research the most plentiful commodity (WR), and there's nothing like winning your week due to that scrub WR proving dividends. Yahoo! Friends and Family League uses a similar format. With roster positions currently I still saw over the year tons of people ignoring the value of the WR position in the flex, teams would carry in some cases 3 TEs! So I say cut off an extra bench spot to comp for the extra position spot. Reduces hoarding even more.
No Playoff Reseeding is self explanatory
Initially I thought that using Puddles' FAAB w/ Reverse order of standings tiebreak setting might be better, but I like the continuous one better because it's more random (sense a pattern here). In the NEL you knew if you tied bids the worse team would get that player, no such luck with this system.