PSY・S;234282811 said:
I'm well aware of that. I'm also aware that giant Russel was previously previously drawn normally, not as a "Black brute".
You got something for the Asian caricature?
.
And he's still not drawn as a black brute, if you go by literally every other instance of him being drawn in phase 4. As in,
literally every other instance. He's naked and being held against his will, I don't know what you want me to tell you. There's also the fact that Jamie Hewlett's artstyle changes with every phase
As for asian caricatures, yes I know that they're caricatures, I'm not saying they're okay, but it's making fun of the army of North Korea, I wouldn't say that this is a battle worth fighting.
Here is the definition of caricature
a picture, description, or imitation of a person or thing in which certain striking characteristics are exaggerated in order to create a comic or grotesque effect.
A caricature of something isn't inherently bad and by definition a caricature is going to exaggerate prominent features. If a street caricature artist is drawing a group of dark skinned people that have large lips and noses, are they racist? the answer is obviously not, because it's not trying to depict them in a negative light. Comedic, sure, but that's not inherently a bad thing. It depends on the intention. Those WW2 posters have the intention of painting asians in a bad light. I don't believe that Jamie Hewlett had this intention.
But if you're hell bent on painting Jamie Hewlett as a racist for his artwork maybe you look into all of the productions he's been involved in, particularly this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey:_Journey_to_the_West
and look at all of the world inspired art Jamie Hewlett has done and then ask yourself is this person a racist because they made some caricatures.