Master Yoshi
Member
4chan in White House and GAF at WSJ
What a time to be alive
4chan is in the White House?
4chan in White House and GAF at WSJ
What a time to be alive
4chan is in the White House?
Let's take your "evidence" from 2008 as an example:
I'm not sure what the point is to any of this. Wealthy Russians were putting their money prime real estate all around the globe at this point. Take this article from The Guardian in 2007 for example:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2007/apr/13/2
There's about a million other articles around this period and documenting the same thing.
There's nothing remotely relevant or interesting about anything you've put together. Lots of investors in Trump property were Russians. So what? That's pretty much what you'd expect. And Chinese and Arabs - anywhere where there was a whole lot of new wealth, the wealthy were buying prime real estate abroad. Trump probably looked at investing in all those countries as well, as if those people were buying prime real estate abroad, it probably meant there was enough wealth in those countries to support domestic investments.
Basically it's just a whole lot of Russian bashing. Some guy called Dmitry Rybolovlev buying a house off Trump means he gets named in your fake news as well.
Can someone explain this thread to me. What the hell is going on.
What did Polari do now.
He said the OP is just posting fake news and now the WSJ is actually reporting pretty much the same stuff.
They're not though - they're reporting that he was a source for the dossier. The only real source claiming he has close ties to Trump is still just the guy himself, beyond that photo. Trump Org, Cohen all deny he had anything to do with him: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-r...ce-key-trump-dossier-claims/story?id=45019603
And I maintain 90% of the facts "reported" in the OP are irrelevant, as you can see in the example I provided. That's not journalism, that's implying conclusions can be drawn from facts that don't back it up.
If concrete evidence of a close relationship between Trump and this guy turns up, I'll gladly take a walk though.
Every time you guys say WSJ I keep wondering why Shonen Jump is talking about American politics.
So, you are just going to take the word of Michael Cohen over the well put together and sourced paper trail of connections and sources listed in the OP?
Do you think he spoke favorably of Trump with the Russian press and press elsewhere out of the kindness of his own heart?
Why would he be at the black tie inauguration event if Cohen and the Trump org seem to be hostile with him as they themselves claim since the summer of this year? Here is on stage on Jan 20.
Seems to have some ties to me.
Can someone get this to the proper media attention? WSJ is a locked source
I don't know how you get tickets for something like that - I assume some are just for sale? As for why he keeps blabbing Trump's name (he even gave an interview to ABC News back in July), I'm guessing he wants publicity. If he's colluding with Trump or a Russian intelligence agent he's doing a pretty shit job flying under the radar. Occam's razor - the simplest explanation is also the most probable.
They're not though - they're reporting that he was a source for the dossier. The only real source claiming he has close ties to Trump is still just the guy himself, beyond that photo. Trump Org, Cohen all deny he had anything to do with him: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-r...ce-key-trump-dossier-claims/story?id=45019603
And I maintain 90% of the facts "reported" in the OP are irrelevant, as you can see in the example I provided. That's not journalism, that's implying conclusions can be drawn from facts that don't back it up.
If concrete evidence of a close relationship between Trump and this guy turns up, I'll gladly take a walk though.
Oh yeah, Cohen and Trumps people deny they are involved with Russia. They would definitely just admit if they were colluding with them.
Can someone explain this thread to me. What the hell is going on.
What did Polari do now.
Same thing he does in all these threads: defends Trump to the last breath while denying that he's a Trump supporter to the last breath.
Every time you guys say WSJ I keep wondering why Shonen Jump is talking about American politics.
Same thing he does in all these threads: defends Trump to the last breath while denying that he's a Trump supporter to the last breath.
Same thing he does in all these threads: defends Trump to the last breath while denying that he's a Trump supporter to the last breath.
Also an anagram of JSW.
I don't really care if you guys think I'm a Trump supporter (I've made plenty of posts that would indicate I'm not), but it seems like it would be better for the discussion if you attacked the content of my posts rather than me though. It's fine if people want to debate whether or not I'm right in calling it fake news for example.
I don't really care if you guys think I'm a Trump supporter (I've made plenty of posts that would indicate I'm not), but it seems like it would be better for the discussion if you attacked the content of my posts rather than me though. It's fine if people want to debate whether or not I'm right in calling it fake news for example.
I sometimes wonder if these theories sound as crazy to conservatives as the birther movement was to liberals.
I want to believe, but it's just so out there.
Like.
It can't be "fake news".
The points are sourced.
You can argue about whether the individual pieces add up to a true narrative, or if the links are just convenient.
But "fake news" is, e.g., saying "Sergei Millian is in the White House right now making Trump lick his face in exchange for Putin's blessing."
In that it's something I just made up. I have nothing to substantiate it. It's a fabrication spun to muddy the waters of reality.
Saying "Trump has ties to Sergei Millian and Russian intelligence" is not that because there are facts that substantiate a relationship right in front of us.
C'mon.
Firstly, I understand "Trump has ties" is a loaded phrase. You're assuming I meant to impart the most negative connotation. I didn't. (I even updated the OP to reflect this.) Once again, I apologise if it was misleading in any way. However, technically speaking he *does* have ties. Now, they may be tenuous. I'm not disputing that.Yeah I mean I'm not disputing the facts, but I think saying "Trump has ties to Sergei Millian and Russian intelligence" is disingenuous...
Holy shit, GAF works at Reuters now too. I remember a post of compiled sources with the outline of this article.
Nice hat
Holy shit, GAF works at Reuters now too. I remember a post of compiled sources with the outline of this article.
Yeah, that 19.5% story another GAFer worked on is also an extremely important "tie" to investigate. Possibly even more important.Holy shit, GAF works at Reuters now too. I remember a post of compiled sources with the outline of this article.
Oh yeah, wasn't it RDreamer?
Yeah I mean I'm not disputing the facts, but I think saying "Trump has ties to Sergei Millian and Russian intelligence" is disingenuous considering the only evidence beyond the word of Millian is a photo from eight years ago,
You're downplaying this so fucking hard.The difference between this post and the WSJ article is that the WSJ story is that this guy who has been claiming he has links to Trump (which the article clearly states have never been verified and are denied by Trump Org and Cohen) is the source for the dossier (which has been widely reported to the extent that anything related to it is a news story in itself). The story isn't "Trump has ties to Sergei Millian and Russian intelligence".
Isn't that Lawrence from the band Felt?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=228363285&postcount=12831
Ex Mi-6 agent Chris Steele's 35 page long opposition research dossier on Trump is dated October 18th and has this bombshell in it:
Russian State Oil Company CEO Sechin (who is part of Putin's inner circle) offered Trump/Page associates 19% stake in Rosneft if personal and state sanctions were lifted.
SOURCE: https://assets.documentcloud.org/doc...llegations.pdf
On November 7th, Russia signed the deal to sell 19.5% of its stake in Rosneft - which amounts to $11 billion - to Glencore Plc and Qatar sovereign wealth fund.
Commodity trader Glencore Plc and Qatar's sovereign wealth fund agreed to buy a 10.2-billion euro ($11 billion) stake in Russia's largest oil producer from the state in a triumph for President Vladimir Putin over sanctions imposed by the West.
SOURCE:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...for-11-billion
According to a source close to Rosneft's management board, the deal came as a surprise to Rosneft's shareholders, including Britain's BP (BP.L), which itself owns 19.75 percent of Rosneft and is represented on its board.
The Rosneft board learned about the sale from Sechin himself only on Dec. 7, several hours after Sechin recorded his televised meeting with Putin announcing it, the source said.
The content of your posts attacks itself.
Isn't that Lawrence from the band Felt?
They're not though - they're reporting that he was a source for the dossier. The only real source claiming he has close ties to Trump is still just the guy himself, beyond that photo. Trump Org, Cohen all deny he had anything to do with him: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-r...ce-key-trump-dossier-claims/story?id=45019603
And I maintain 90% of the facts "reported" in the OP are irrelevant, as you can see in the example I provided. That's not journalism, that's implying conclusions can be drawn from facts that don't back it up.
If concrete evidence of a close relationship between Trump and this guy turns up, I'll gladly take a walk though.
Wall Street Journal said:Mr. Millian, who posted photos of himself at several VIP events at the Trump inauguration last week, said in an email that the information in the dossier was ”fake news (created by sick minds)," and was ”an attempt to distract the future president from real work."
Mr. Millian didn't respond to a long list of other questions, including whether he was a source for the dossier.
Michael Cohen, a Trump Organization executive vice president who is resigning to become Mr. Trump's personal attorney, said he was baffled by the idea that Mr. Millian could have been a source for claims in the dossier about events, such as a 2013 Moscow hotel stay, that he had nothing to do with.
Mr. Cohen said ”there is not an ounce of truth" to Mr. Millian's claims to have had a relationship with Mr. Trump or the Trump Organization. Mr. Millian had met Mr. Trump once, at a photo op, Mr. Cohen said.
What the fuck is going on in this thread? I'm so confused.
A deal between Italian Eni and Gazprom picked CEIGH as a partner delivering gas to Italy.
Investigations by members of the Italian parliament revealed that Bruno Mentasti-Granelli, who is known as a close friend of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, owns 33 percent of CEIGH through two companies, Hexagon Prima and Hexagon Seconda.
The deal was denounced due to the spreading scandal. Italian parliament blocked the contract, accusing Berlusconi of having a personal interest in the contract.
Robert Nowikovsky, an Austrian lawyer linked to Russian operations, was one of the company's directors.
The 2008 article "Berlusconi, Centrex, Hexagon 1 and 2 and Gazprom" suggested:
This subterfuge suggests that the Italian Prime Minister is deeply indebted to Moscow and will play the role of a loyal puppet, similar to that played by former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and former EU Commissioner Romano Prodi, who have been promoting the Kremlin's energy, and possibly other, interests in their home countries and in the EU in any which way they can.
In 2009, the European Commission filed formal antitrust charges against Eni. The commission believes that Eni has conspired to keep competitors from using its gas pipelines.
In 2009 again, according to the WikiLeaks cables, US ambassador Lanier told Washington that bribery allegations were made in Uganda by Eni which at the time was in competition for oil assets in the country against Tullow Oil. The bribes were taken by the newly appointed Ugandan prime minister, Amama Mbabane.
After corruption charges against the subsidiary Saipem, Eni's CFO Alessandro Bernini had to resign and the new CFO Massimo Mondazzi took over in December 2012.