New Multiplayer Halo 4 screenshots and video

to me this looks like halo reach 2, the graphics dont really stand out in comparison to reach. But then again, i think reach looks good, the art is a bit better, but nothing in the engine screams out at me as being amazing in comparison.
 
to me this looks like halo reach 2, the graphics dont really stand out in comparison to reach. But then again, i think reach looks good, the art is a bit better, but nothing in the engine screams out at me as being amazing in comparison.

Reach looks like a stylized cartoon compared to this.
 
So it's Halo 1 GOD TIER? 343i nailed it.

Idk I just don't find it much different lately. All these dumb perks and COD influences will hurt the game.

I also don't find the sound very engaging and I doubt the it will have a poignant story.

343 should just make this MP a downloadable XBLA title. No need to waste time on the SP which will be corridor shooting and perk bonanza.


to me this looks like halo reach 2, the graphics dont really stand out in comparison to reach. But then again, i think reach looks good, the art is a bit better, but nothing in the engine screams out at me as being amazing in comparison.

Exactly I just don't see what's so good looking in Halo 4... Looks like Halo 3.5 or Reach to be honest.

*sigh*

Another failure on the horizon.
 
If you're gonna troll you're gonna have to try harder than that, man.

IMG_5053.JPG


0.jpg

Which one is Halo 4??

They both look exactly the same.
 
Idk I just don't find it much different lately. All these dumb perks and COD influences will hurt the game.

I also don't find the sound very engaging and I doubt the it will have a poignant story.

343 should just make this MP a downloadable XBLA title. No need to waste time on the SP which will be corridor shooting and perk bonanza.




Exactly I just don't see what's so good looking in Halo 4... Looks like Halo 3.5 or Reach to be honest.

*sigh*

Another failure on the horizon.
Perhaps you should read the definition of failure,

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/failure

Going by the dictionary definition, no Halo game has been a failure in quality or sales. So I think you should start researching what words mean before you use them in a sentence.
 
No need to waste time on the SP which will be corridor shooting and perk bonanza.

Just want to point you that you called Halo a corridor shooter. Anyone replying to any of your posts should take that into consideration.

Never mind you can't seem to be able to tell the difference between Reach and Halo 4. You're really hitting it out of the park here. Please, keep on saying stuff.
 
Idk I just don't find it much different lately. All these dumb perks and COD influences will hurt the game.

I also don't find the sound very engaging and I doubt the it will have a poignant story.

343 should just make this MP a downloadable XBLA title. No need to waste time on the SP which will be corridor shooting and perk bonanza.




Exactly I just don't see what's so good looking in Halo 4... Looks like Halo 3.5 or Reach to be honest.

*sigh*

Another failure on the horizon.

Oh I am so sorry you don't care about single player, oh wait you think its a corridor shooter lol

MANY people love the single player experience of Halo and the story is getting pretty good with the return of Chief and Cortana, the Didact, the Composer and many more story elements and characters 343 have or are going to introduce to players in Halo 4.


Also Another Failure? Yep Halo has always made a huge hole in Microsoft's wallet and millions of people hate it :/

EDIT: Yeah, you wont last long here....
 
Idk I just don't find it much different lately. All these dumb perks and COD influences will hurt the game.

I also don't find the sound very engaging and I doubt the it will have a poignant story.

343 should just make this MP a downloadable XBLA title. No need to waste time on the SP which will be corridor shooting and perk bonanza.

I'm starting to wonder if you've ever played a Halo campaign.
 
Oh I am so sorry you don't care about single player, oh wait you think its a corridor shooter lol

MANY people love the single player experience of Halo and the story is getting pretty good with the return of Chief and Cortana, the Didact, the Composer and many more story elements and characters 343 have or are going to introduce to players in Halo 4.


Also Another Failure? Yep Halo has always made a huge hole in Microsoft's wallet and millions of people hate it :/

Look above.

Lmao wow Halo fanboys so quick to defend their game they overlooked my post above where I simply said I was joking.

Calm down brehs I'm just as excited to press R and shoot my first battle rifle since Halo 3.
 
It will always fall short of the greatness of it's predecessors so therefore






















your-argument-is-invalid.jpg




















200px-Trollface.svg.png






LMAO I'm kidding guys I couldn't be more hype for Halo 4. Just felt like ruffling your feathers and nettling someone haha.

You come into a Halo thread to post bullshit like this!? Seriously, get the fuck outta here. No one wants this shit around.

PS; Nobody cares if you're joking. It's pointless to come in here and bash Halo. It's a Halo thread.
 
You come into a Halo thread to post bullshit like this!? Seriously, get the fuck outta here. No one wants this shit around.
PS; Nobody cares if you're joking. It's pointless to come in here and bash Halo. It's a Halo thread.

803777d1346092745-told-mens-timepiece-1168834-calm_down_bro_super.jpg

A little trolling won't derail your precious halo.

You obviously cared enough to warrant typing a spiteful response.

It's alright man.
 
Lol really. I just love the serious retorts I get when I post evocatively.

You actually saying here that you were flame baiting to amuse yourself?

You do know that you're risking your account right? Pissing people off for no good reason ain't nice and your twisted troll version of Poe's law ain't no defence.
 
You actually saying here that you were flame baiting to amuse yourself?

You do know that you're risking your account right? Pissing people off for no good reason ain't nice and your twisted troll version of Poe's law ain't no defence.

It's that serious in this part of town??
Wow lots of serious shawns in this forum.

Go ahead I will bother you no more.
It was just a little joke I''ll gladly stop.

*throws a frag grenade on the way out*
 
i dont see why the game looking similar to Halo Reach is a bad thing. we're on a 7 year old console and they're using the same engine. there's no much else they can really do with this system.

the game looks great gameplay wise. graphically, it's whatever. nothing on consoles look good to me right now. it looks to be very fun though. i can't wait to get my hands on this
 
and they're using the same engine

Nope, unless you're also saying Halo 1, 2, 3, ODST, and Reach all have the same engine.

I think they're pushing it further and harder than Bungie did with Reach, which is a hell of an accomplishment all considering.

Seven year old hardware and we're seeing these results.
 
Not only is Halo a bit long in the tooth at this point, but it's also being handed over to a new developer. Halo 4 was destined to be disappointing, uninspired, and the beginning of the end for Halo as a series IMO.

Then, somehow, this new studio managed to absolutely fucking NAIL it in every aspect. From the graphics/artstyle to the gameplay. You absolutely have to give it up to 343. These guys had everything going against them on this one and managed to wow the shit out of just about every Halo fan and non Halo fan alike.

I can not wait for November.
 
One of them has better lighting, better shadowing, more background detail, a more mature art style, and better shaders... That is Halo odst.

fixed.

But really, I see the better lighting, but it's nothing spectacular compared to reach, the art direction is more fantasy like, which i think is more fitting for the idea of exploration they're trying to convey with this being a new trilogy, new location ect. But it's not "mature" in comparison. Unless you think immature things like the overly dramatic violence is "mature". The shaders are the same as reach, the only really difference is that they've got more optimization and time spent with the tools, which means you have your standard upgrades to the visuals. The game is really doesn't look like any miraculous leap from reach in visuals.


I'm just afraid people are hyping this game up, only to get disappointed by the release, like so many games this gen before it (uncharted 3 and maxpayne spring to mind recently).

that said, the direction their going with the gameplay is backwards, ms really pushed the "cod" effect on bungie with reach and I think it made the gameplay feel stale. This seems to be pushing it even more, and again I think it's a backfire. Halo used to innovate, and until reach it really did that, then reach felt like it was playing catch-up and was confused. It lost the speed and arcade nature of the sandbox because you had so many stupid aa things slowing down gameplay.
 
fixed.

But really, I see the better lighting, but it's nothing spectacular compared to reach, the art direction is more fantasy like, which i think is more fitting for the idea of exploration they're trying to convey with this being a new trilogy, new location ect. But it's not "mature" in comparison. Unless you think immature things like the overly dramatic violence is "mature". The shaders are the same as reach, the only really difference is that they've got more optimization and time spent with the tools, which means you have your standard upgrades to the visuals. The game is really doesn't look like any miraculous leap from reach in visuals.


I'm just afraid people are hyping this game up, only to get disappointed by the release, like so many games this gen before it (uncharted 3 and maxpayne spring to mind recently).

that said, the direction their going with the gameplay is backwards, ms really pushed the "cod" effect on bungie with reach and I think it made the gameplay feel stale. This seems to be pushing it even more, and again I think it's a backfire. Halo used to innovate, and until reach it really did that, then reach felt like it was playing catch-up and was confused. It lost the speed and arcade nature of the sandbox because you had so many stupid aa things slowing down gameplay.

ODST? Really?
 
Just wanted to say that the sound is fucking incredible in this video, man. The tank sounds like the monster it used to in Halo 1 and the Gauss cannon, OMG. You can literally feel the velocity coming off that thing.

Without a doubt the absolute best sound design of any Halo, hands down no debate.
 
Not really. Marginal improvement at best. Art style is the only major improvement.

The single player gameplay looked leaps above in many ways, like lighting, resolution, detail etc

The multiplayer is always looking way worst than the SP game and maps are rather empty too to support the more players and mayhem
 
I love how he's trying to get away right as you stab him.

Yeah, the animators really did a great job. It's such a big jump from what you saw in Reach. I mean, Reach's animation wasn't bad, but assassinations always kind of seem like the victim is just allowing you to kill them, and kind of getting in position for it to happen, but 4's assassinations look much more like an actual fight between two Spartans.
 
Top Bottom