open_mouth_
insert_foot_
Looks HAWT! The PGR series is one of my favorites.
Shogmaster said:All you tools who can't comprehend how we can see 60fps smoothness on a 30fps video, wrap your simple brains around this:
- The video was captured on a camcorder.
- Camcorder captures @ 30fps.
- Video runs on the screen @ 60 fps.
- Each frame camcorder records, at least two frames have apeared on the screen (and usually 3, due to staggering).
- Camcorder records a frame that is a blend of at least two frames, if not 3.
Yes, motion blurring, bitches.
This is like bitching about how 24fps movie camera can record smoothness of real life. Is reality limited to 24fps? Does reality look choppy to you on film? Now shut up and let us enojoy these.
sly said:YES! LETS POLYGONIZE BITCHES! :lolIAWTP!
Shogmaster said:All you tools who can't comprehend how we can see 60fps smoothness on a 30fps video, wrap your simple brains around this:
- The video was captured on a camcorder.
- Camcorder captures @ 30fps.
- Video runs on the screen @ 60 fps.
- Each frame camcorder records, at least two frames have apeared on the screen (and usually 3, due to staggering).
- Camcorder records a frame that is a blend of at least two frames, if not 3.
Yes, motion blurring, bitches.
This is like bitching about how 24fps movie camera can record smoothness of real life. Is reality limited to 24fps? Does reality look choppy to you on film? Now shut up and let us enojoy these.
Shogmaster said:All you tools who can't comprehend how we can see 60fps smoothness on a 30fps video, wrap your simple brains around this:
- The video was captured on a camcorder.
- Camcorder captures @ 30fps.
- Video runs on the screen @ 60 fps.
- Each frame camcorder records, at least two frames have apeared on the screen (and usually 3, due to staggering).
- Camcorder records a frame that is a blend of at least two frames, if not 3.
Yes, motion blurring, bitches.
This is like bitching about how 24fps movie camera can record smoothness of real life. Is reality limited to 24fps? Does reality look choppy to you on film? Now shut up and let us enojoy these.
quadriplegicjon said:motion blur can be an effect in the actual game. thats no way to tell.
There is a difference (at least when you pause the image) between motion blur and image blending. If you see 2 different images in one frame (with nothing in common with the frame before or after of course), then it's a 60 fps video. If you see a trailing effect on some or all elements of the video with some stuff still there in the next frame, then it's a blur of some sort.quadriplegicjon said:motion blur can be an effect in the actual game. thats no way to tell.
You should also tell them to not to worry, there is still a chance that the game will run at 30fps. Leave them with something to possibly bash the game about.Shogmaster said:There are absolutely no GPR3 screens with the cars being motion blurred. The footage is 60fps. Let's move on.
dorio said:You should also tell them to not to worry, there is still a chance that the game will run at 30fps. Leave them with something to possibly bash the game about.![]()
Stinkles said:Here's a thought. Of course there are going to be games in 720p/1080i that don't achieve 60fps - but there's really less excuse for the 480i/p version to run at less. So will I ever find myself playing the 480p version for a frame rate increase, or will devs lock accross resolutions?
TheInkyVoid said:Racing games on a track always look good.
PGR3 the world is one large static piece of geometry. Nothing but shiny cars. No damage or anything else dynamic in the game other than smoke. And when there actually is some dynamic geometry in the scene besides the cars the framerate tanks.
Shogmaster said:Depends if the engine is geometry bottlenecked or fillrate. If it's geometry, then the game will still run at the same fps in 480i/p.
Pug said:Inky, you really don't know much about the game do you. PGR3 will feature realtime damage to all cars.
bill0527 said:I'll get equal time to shit all over their threads when their favorite companies start showing the goods.
RE4 vs. SH4 said:There are 4 videos inside that link: Visuals, Audio, Customization, and Gotham TV. Which one is the trailer?
Lazy8s said:Motion blur -- not the motion trails stuff performed in today's games -- is done by sampling the game's framerate faster than it's being displayed,
sangreal said:Gotham TV
cyberheater said:With a bit of luck. By the time decent enough realtime screen shots of actual PS3 games start surfacing I'll be too busy playing PGR3 to care.![]()
Gek54 said:If you change your avitar to anything else I promise I will.
Motion blur -- not the motion trails stuff performed in today's games -- is done by sampling the game's framerate faster than it's being displayed,
Blimblim said:There is a difference (at least when you pause the image) between motion blur and image blending. If you see 2 different images in one frame (with nothing in common with the frame before or after of course), then it's a 60 fps video. If you see a trailing effect on some or all elements of the video with some stuff still there in the next frame, then it's a blur of some sort.
Usually damage is the last thing shown in a racing game because of the numerous license issues. I remember being contacted by MS about one month before Rallisport 2 was released because some screenshots I had posted were showing damage, and the license with some manufacturer had not officially started yet.TheInkyVoid said:How come none of that is in the video just released? It is supposed to be a launch title right?
thorns said:It's very easy to tell the video is 60 fps by pausing the frames in the trailer. In most cases you can see two distinct frames, esp. on fast moving objects.
![]()
![]()
seriously this discussion should be over now..
Why do you hate MS so much? Why do you have to argue that stuff is inferior without knowing it for a fact?Gek54 said:Doesnt prove shit because its more than likely that the the camera and the source are not in sync which would lean on the side that PGR3 that was shown was indeed only 30fps. You would see at least 3 frames of the source in one frame of the recorded video unless there was a miracle that everything was synced up.
Check out any Forza movie were they use a camera on a monitor to record. You get the same two images that your pictures show... and we all know that Forza was never shown running at 60fps.
Gek54 said:Doesnt prove shit because its more than likely that the the camera and the source are not in sync which would lean on the side that PGR3 that was shown was indeed only 30fps. You would see at least 3 frames of the source in one frame of the recorded video unless there was a miracle that everything was synced up.
Check out any Forza movie were they use a camera on a monitor to record. You get the same two images that your pictures show... and we all know that Forza was never shown running at 60fps.
gigapower said:I've got wood from that video.
olimario said:I'm buying a 360. If PGR3 continues to look like this I might not purchase it.