$800 PS6 will only get you low-end performance. No company will give out their chips at bargain bin prices in the current climate when they can get crazy margins elsewhere, the good old days are over.
They could, but they won't because people buy it anyways. Looks at the state of PC Gaming at the moment. Broken mess after broken mess. Thankfully I have a 4090 so I can brute force basically anything, but that is 1% of the market. Monster Hunter Wilds broke records for the franchise and is a disaster on PC and looks like trash on my PS5 Pro on Performance Mode.
It is first party, which is why it's also Game Pass day 1. MS is funding the game to be made.That's still a "no" dear Adam.
And no, I also don't consider Stellar blade nor ROTR 1P so I'm not one of these folks
I don't agree at all. Especially when TV manufacturers are continuously bringing higher end features down into entry level sets in an effort to drive sales. 120hz and VRR are already starting to trickle down into lower costs TV's. This drive to pick up such a display will be exasperated when they're new game console is pushing this feature through frame gen.
I agree on principal, but I guess more what I would like is something perhaps a bit stronger than what we have now but far more efficient and quieter and cooler, With even faster data read/write speeds
So is my Gears Xbox One X!
To be fair, folks with cheap TVs are unlikely to be early adopters for PS6. And those who are early adopters are likely to have nicer TVs.
Again, I disagree. Just as the 7th gen consoles were forward thinking with pushing HD support, 9th gen consoles were forward thinking with advertising 120hz support, obviously the 10th gen consoles (which will have frame gen support) is going to strongly lean into the tech in their advertising. I just can't even comprehend how one could argue against this sentiment.
I can't for the life of me see how that invalidates what I said. The best sellers are a bunch of cheap TV's. 120hz is finding it's way into cheaper televisions. In 2025 there are low cost 120hz displays and there will be even more low cost 120hz options in 2027. How does any of this tie into the your assertion that 4k 120hz gameplay is not going to be a marquee feature of the PS6 and next Xbox? HFR gameplay is quite literally the defining advertised feature of the highest end graphical tech, it's absurd to claim this won't also be the case for the next gen consoles.
You are conflating if people will buy a PS6 for 120hz and if sony will advertise 120hz as a marquee feature, these are not mutually exclusive. I edited my last post to try and end the debate, so I will not go further.
GTA VI - The Definition Edition for PS6.
What I am saying is while they "may" want to keep TVs longer, those TVs won't last since the quality sucks.
If the murmurs are true, Microsoft's next console will have a massive amount of AI-powered grunt and side-load stores like Steam and Epic, granting access to your existing libraries on Xbox's new hardware out of the box. The catch is that it's expected to have a very high price point - Microsoft will be making a profit on the hardware - meaning it'll be higher than traditional console pricing. The PS5 Pro gives us a clear indication Sony is also aiming for much higher pricing, but I'd expect the next Xbox's price tag to cause some sticker shock if it can actually do what they're hinting it can do.
The gap between PS1 and PS2 was just a bit over 5 years, while the gap between PS2 and PS3 was a lot closer to pure 7 years. PSP, PS3 and PS4 (in the West) had 7 year lifecycles, while PS4 in Japan lasted as much as the PS2 did there (6 years and 8 months, to be precise).
Very true.
To sell you current gen remasters.
Yeah, PS5 hardware became very dated quite quickly because Sony failed to see the future of game development. A cut down CPU with a GPU that focuses on pure raster performance is basically the opposite of how to make new games run well.
I haven't turned my xbox on since summer 2022, you aren't missing anything
