I kinda agree.![]()
So what explained what was the original deletion has been deleted.What was deleted was deleted. And if you want to know what was deleted ... it was deleted so I don't know^^
I don't understand how this kind of thing wasn't picked up in a meeting at some point.
Keep that up and you'll be FINito around here...I was going to originally put you on a seated skateboard due to height restrictions but cannon had to do.![]()
I dont get how 500 people working on halo, and no one thought to say, are we sure we should show this.....
Hehe....
Penello is a known liar and FUD spreader, used to work for MS, now works for... I don't know, someone else lol. Caught spreading his bull on this very forum.Not sure who Penello is or what you're talking about. Your beef isn't with me even if you direct it at me, I guess we're just one big amorphous blob so you can throw your gripes at any of us, right? What's lame is how you're behaving over a joke.
People DO understand that Microsoft has some of the smartest graphics programmers IN THE WORLD. We CREATED DirectX, the standard APIs that everyone programs against. So while people laude Sony for their HW skills, do you really think we dont know how to build a system optimized for maximizing graphics for programmers? Seriously? There is no way were giving up a 30%+ advantage to Sony. And ANYONE who has seen both systems running could say there are great looking games on both systems. If there was really huge performance difference it would be obvious.
I get a ton of hate for saying this but its been the same EVERY generation. Sony claims more power, they did it with Cell, they did it with Emotion Engine, and they are doing it again. And, in the end, games on our system looked the same or better.
Im not saying they havent built a good system Im merely saying that anyone who wants to die on their sword over this 30%+ power advantage are going to be fighting an uphill battle over the next 10 years
"We believe that the overwhelming majority of the 4,000+ PS4 titles will be playable on PS5."
Sony does.
![]()
Unveiling New Details of PlayStation 5: Hardware Technical Specs [UPDATED]
Watch live for a deep dive into PS5's system architecture and how it will shape the future of games.blog.playstation.com
There are currently 2860 games on this list. (b)
b. ^ This number is always up to date by this script.
This template counts the number of rows in wikitext tables.
And I mean game pass is good. It's a service that I see no value from personally. Plenty of people want to play older games. No issue with that. Issue is that I'm what they don't want... Someone that doesn't ever play old games. So I and others like me have no value to them because it's going to have to take some extensive mental bios upgrade for them to accept a lot of people just prefer the newer shinier 'in' thing and not something from years ago.
Avatar please1 ticket please!
Not again, not the blue balls...
![]()
Was the store experiencing a major earthquake when this photo was taken? With smartphones everywhere, we get a picture just half a step better than a blurry distance shot of Sasquatch.Just in case you see this today.... Its a fake.
![]()
Nice Ad Hominem
Pretty clear you don't like the message.
EDIT: one more
![]()
Even Bloomberg is just guessing based on publicly known bulk prices ( most of the time higher than actual in the world of bulk sales and large scale projects). This really depends on how much Sony is expected to sell and how that can influence the negotiations.
Also the price of the console is not based on the cost of the first year units but rather on the cost forcast in the longer term and how much is the profit forecast in that same time frame.
Also if sony sees high demand on their console then they may not worry much about launch year pricethey can keep it as high as they can and reduce it in a 2nd year. PS3 was able to sell 88 million despite a first year of 599. The market is much bigger now and Phil Spencer's Xbox is not Peter Moore' s Xbox.
Hehe....
I kinda agree.![]()
Not again, not the blue balls...
![]()
Even Major Nelson doesn't get the Xbox marketing, though, and he works for them.nope I am not upset, I am adult that is not getting upset by stuff online, it is just funny how any stupid tweet from Greenberg or Xbox marketing is getting slammed in here, and apparently, Sony camp is not doing any cringe and it is okay for guy that is game dev post something that is simply stupid (in context of him working in game industry and not being able to comprehend something that it is not that complex)
If you believe in his words despite of his reputation and his dubious "dev" status that's okay.Then just refute his points, it's apparently very easy
Then just refute his points, it's apparently very easy
I don't know if it's fake. From the same mall as the previous one
![]()
The console got too well received, so insecurity is getting the best of peopleWhy is this big news? Can someone explain please? XSS is not a 4k console why would you want to play 4k games on it. Am i missing something here?
One of them who didn't have the hardware, and the other who will release games on PC with lower specs than the XSS.Why? Senior Devs from several developers have stressed the Series S will impact development, I take their word over a fake dev that has 0 games under his belt.
One of them who didn't have the hardware, and the other who will release games on PC with lower specs than the XSS.
These guys are teasing you two in here? Let me straighten'em up
Well... I think these stones... they are like tombstones.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Now , don't you guys be trolling so much. Be good boys. Ponder at what tomorrow brings
hey, don't blame me for it. I am only REPLYING WHEN QUOTED about this, and as you can see above I keep it to a minimum
edit: oh and I reply only to those that I don't have on ignore list, so that makes my responses waaaayy less than they could have been.
Except, he corrected himself and literally said it will be RDNA 2 plus more features. you are the one that is going against him and claiming he only did that to make people happy.
I just remembered
![]()
Only 2008 GAF will get this
When you see it![]()
At best just placeholders again. Just look at how they can't even get the Xbox names right.
VS one of them that has no games, no hardware and is a fanboy.One of them who didn't have the hardware, and the other who will release games on PC with lower specs than the XSS.
And Gavin does?![]()
![]()
![]()
You're still in denial, it's ok.
I'm not saying Gavin is right, but like I said. Feel free to refute his comments, instead of questioning his character.VS one of them that has no games, no hardware and is a fanboy.
Didn't he lie about the specs on Era and get banned? He refuted himself.I'm not saying Gavin is right, but like I said. Feel free to refute his comments, instead of questioning his character.
Recommend you to put Greatwhiteshark's avatar on Phil Spencers board, near Craig
I'm not saying Gavin is right, but like I said. Feel free to refute his comments, instead of questioning his character.
I'm not familiar, show me
In Spain xbox is not well known. They can be quietly wrong
Again, his comments have been refuted by devs that have showed actual work in some of the biggest companies and working with some of the best game engines. Why should I even bother to refute a "dev" that has so far released no games? Do you understand how asinine that is?
Also, to your bullshit argument that Devs X / Y develop games for lower spec'd hardware on PC, that is proof that that lower spec'd hardware is the baseline. So for a game developed for the"next-gen" Xbox consoles, or just 'next-gen' consoles in general, your baseline will be the Series S, which can't even play One X enhanced games. That's all, a toddler could understand this: The lower your hardware target is, the less scope your game can have as more compromises need to be made.
Quick question. Did Cerny build a PC?
Okay. How about the Xbox prices then? They are a flat 249€/€499 and don't have those 90 cents on the end!
Imagine the poor parent buys that fortnite version then to know that his kid can't play it because he needs to pay $10/month, $120/year GOLD to play free2play game.![]()
Why is this big news? Can someone explain please? XSS is not a 4k console why would you want to play 4k games on it. Am i missing something here?
Imagine the poor parent buys that fortnite version then to know that his kid can't play it because he needs to pay $10/month, $120/year GOLD to play free2play game.![]()
Sure single tweet is completely refuting everything he says... While at the same time, we've also got a dev from Wastelands that says it's not that big of a deal, just a bit more work.Again, his comments have been refuted by devs that have showed actual work in some of the biggest companies and working with some of the best game engines. Why should I even bother to refute a "dev" that has so far released no games? Do you understand how asinine that is?
Also, to your bullshit argument that Devs X / Y develop games for lower spec'd hardware on PC, that is proof that that lower spec'd hardware is the baseline. So for a game developed for the"next-gen" Xbox consoles, or just 'next-gen' consoles in general, your baseline will be the Series S, which can't even play One X enhanced games. That's all, a toddler could understand this: The lower your hardware target is, the less scope your game can have as more compromises need to be made.
Wait......what? Seriously, they have to hwve gold, to play a f2p game........Lol
So consumer friendly