• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NFL 2012 Week 7 |OT| Shhhhhhhh

E

eznark

Banned
JABEE said:
I still don't understand how that was the right call.
Click to expand...

KatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrina
 
W

Wes

venison crêpe
Kave_Man said:
"Shurmur says Richardson's ribs not injured further, but he wasn't effective so didn't play second half"
Click to expand...

I don't have a problem with this particular issue. He was 8 for 8 in the first half. Even if he didn't injure it further.... he probably shouldn't have been rushed back to play.
 
H

HarryDemeanor

Member
eznark said:
KatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrinaKatrina
Click to expand...
Did you know that Jimmy Graham played basketball?
 
T

TheFatOne

Member
Can't say I'm surprised by the way the Pats defense is playing right now. They just don't have the talent in the secondary. Last week I realized if they can't stop Russell Wilson they can't stop anyone so there's no point in complaining about them anymore.
 
D

darkside31337

Tomodachi wa Mahou
TheFatOne said:
Can't say I'm surprised by the way the Pats defense is playing right now. They just don't have the talent in the secondary. Last week I realized if they can't stop Russell Wilson they can't stop anyone so there's no point in complaining about them anymore.
Click to expand...

Well I thought they would be good enough to at least stop Sanchez.
 
T

Talon

Member
Straight from the NFL rulebook:
INELIGIBLE RECEIVERS
Article 6 Ineligible Receivers. All offensive players other than those identified in Article 5 above are ineligible to catch a legal or illegal forward pass thrown from behind the line of scrimmage, including:
(a) Players who are not on either end of their line or at least one yard behind it when the ball is snapped.
(b) Offensive players wearing numbers 50-79, unless they have reported a change in their eligibility status
to the Referee and have assumed a position on their line or in their backfield as required by Article 5;
(c) Players who fail to notify the Referee of being eligible when required;
(d) An eligible receiver who has been out of bounds prior to or during a pass, even if he has reestablished himself inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands

Exception: If an eligible receiver is forced out of bounds by a foul by a defender, including illegal contact, defensive holding, or defensive pass interference, he will become eligible to legally touch the pass (without prior touching by another eligible receiver or defender) as soon as he re-establishes himself inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands. See Article 8, Note 3.
(e) A player who takes his stance behind center as a T-formation quarterback is not an eli

ILLEGAL TOUCHING OF A FORWARD PASS
Article 8 Illegal Touching of a Forward Pass. It is a foul for illegal touching if a forward pass (legal or
illegal), thrown from behind the line of scrimmage:
(a) is first touched intentionally or is caught by an ineligible offensive player; or
(b) first touches or is caught by an eligible receiver who has gone out of bounds, either of his own volition or by being legally forced out of bounds, and has re-established himself inbounds.

Penalty: Loss of five yards.
Note 1: If a forward pass (legal or illegal) is caught by an ineligible offensive player, the ball remains alive.
Note 2: The bat of a pass in flight by any player does not end a pass, nor does it change the impetus if the bat
sends it in touch.
Note 3: If a player touches the ball after having been out of bounds, but prior to re-establishing himself inbounds with both feet or any part of his body other than his hands, the pass is incomplete, and there is no penalty for illegal touching.
Click to expand...
Relevant parts bolded.

So as long as he's not forced out by a penalty, it's still illegal touching.
 
K

Kave_Man

come in my shame circle
"Brandon Weeden said they were going for it on 4th and 1 before the timeout and then they changed their mind"

"coach Pat Shurmur said they Colts were forcing them away from the run and thats why they were throwing so much"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

[IGN] Explaining – and Fixing – IGN's Face-Off Controversy
20
1K
March Climber replied
Earth Defense Force 6 |OT| Not afraid of water
|OT| 2
92
4K
bender replied
  • Poll
NFL '23/'24 |OT| Bradyless Edition
|OT| Social 26 27 28 29 30
1K
56K
12Goblins replied
PlayStation Plus Monthly Games for September: Quidditch Champions, MLB The Show 24, Little Nightmares II
News Platform 2
73
2K
Shakka43 replied
Helldivers 2 story recap, plus free post-launch story updates confirmed
News
11
3K
stickkidsam replied
Top Bottom