Vincent Alexander
Member
It was clear as day---should've been Denver ball.Unless they got the rule wrong, the evidence was plain as day.
It was clear as day---should've been Denver ball.Unless they got the rule wrong, the evidence was plain as day.
Unless they got the rule wrong, the evidence was plain as day.
remember when von miller was some type of up and coming superstar? dude has been whisper quiet until that last play
So the rule is that you need clear evidence to overturn a call on the field unless you feel like making shit up as you go?
notice how you're the only one here who thinks he didn't have possession?I didn't realize the ball leaning against your side counted as "control of the ball"
"Rules experts" are the worst thing ever for,commentary
What is Luck throwing breh?
I didn't realize the ball leaning against your side counted as "control of the ball"
So the rule is that you need clear evidence to overturn a call on the field unless you feel like making shit up as you go?
Caught the ball? It certainly touched his hands. But caught and controlled? No.i don't see how it can be any clearer. he caught the ball, was hit, went to the ground with his knee on the ground and the ball still in his possession. how is that not clear as day?