Service meeeeeee
Bucs drafting a punter tomorrow. Your time to shine!
Service meeeeeee
Even with all their picks, the Browns were much more than one QB away this year, especially THIS qb class.
Next year it's likely aside from 3 NFL QB's potentially hitting free agency, that you've got 3 far better QB's (and one in Darnold who's looking like a potential generational talent) and another 5 or so guys at least on the same level as this years top QB's.
Nothing wrong in trying to put the infrastructure in place for the QB to come into
Even with all their picks, the Browns were much more than one QB away this year, especially THIS qb class.
Next year it's likely aside from 3 NFL QB's potentially hitting free agency, that you've got 3 far better QB's (and one in Darnold who's looking like a potential generational talent) and another 5 or so guys at least on the same level as this years top QB's.
Nothing wrong in trying to put the infrastructure in place for the QB to come into
it's going to be so bad to go another 10 years with a bad QB for my Bears
Don't worry you'll go through them like popcorn til you find your Grossman again.
Every year you can say "wait until next year they will be better". I agree you build the team up and be prepared to draft your QB but sooner or later you have to bite the bullet and make your move.
If not you become like the Texans are now. Good enough to make the playoffs but not do too much. They waited since Schaub imploded in 2013 and see where they are at. They have just average QB play last year they beat the Patriots in NE during the playoffs
Every year you can say "wait until next year they will be better". I agree you build the team up and be prepared to draft your QB but sooner or later you have to bite the bullet and make your move.
If not you become like the Texans are now. Good enough to make the playoffs but not do too much. They waited since Schaub imploded in 2013 and see where they are at. They have just average QB play last year they beat the Patriots in NE during the playoffs
For the first time in the common draft era, dating to 1967, not a single offensive lineman was drafted among the top 15. Only two were selected in the first round in total, and the first was not until No. 20 (Utah's Garett Bolles by the Denver Broncos). Wisconsin tackle Ryan Ramczyk was taken No. 32 by the New Orleans Saints.
Now we know why teams paid so dearly for the handful of quality veterans available on the free-agent market this year
Crummy year for teams (Giants) who have bad lines and with some moves, it can put them over the top. I was fine with them not overpaying for medicore players on the line with upcoming contracts to deal wih. But on the other hand, the need for guys like Ereck Flowers, Bobby Hart and DJ Fluker to step up is immense.
The Cowboys had first-round grades on 18 players and Taco Charlton was not one of them, according to Stephen Jones. As the second round looms, the Cowboys have one player with a first round grade still on their board.
Todd Archer, ESPN Staff Writer
Cant believe I live in a world where the Panthers drafted Christian McCaffrey in the top 10 and the Bucs got OJ Howard at #19.
Reese's philosophy of favoring and arguably overgrading perimeter players is why the line is how it is now and why it began to collapse in 2011 (run game was a disaster and the tackles were awful in pass pro; Eli's season should have won MVP) and finished in 2013. There will be high quality starter OL from this draft because every draft has them regardless of the purported strength or lack thereof.
Unfortunately it's a Catch 22 because Reese's track record shows he's a rather poor evaluator of OL talent so even trusting him to make or not make OL picks is flawed because it requires trusting him to properly evaluate the players available to pick!
Taking a small fast TE/WR hybrid at 23 to attack the seams of a C2 is nice, but the primary C2 problem is numbers at the LOS owing to the 1) run game (caused by poor blocking) and 2) teams getting home with 4 rushers (same) .
We attacked a symptom. Not the disease. We may thrive despite this but we're simply delaying another reckoning upfront a la 2013.
Hmmm, Cook maybe?
That and several other picks for no reasonI have not watched the draft and I have not read this topic, but the Bears did waste their pick didn't they?
That and several other picks for no reason
It does feel good to no longer be one of those teams that needs to do some desperate trade up to reach for a QB prospect that probably won't pan out....
It'd be crazy if Cook was there tomorrow. I think we'd have to take him. Although how many weapons can you take while the Oline is still mediocre and the defense could still use some shoring up?
LOLTHIS IS WHO I DO IT FOR MAN.
THIS IS WHO I DO IT FOR MAN.
THIS IS WHO I DO IT FOR MAN.
Predictions for tonight
http://i.imgur.com/rYngY0d.jpg[img][/QUOTE]
You're not happy about the pick? Seems like Jets picked up one of the best players in the draft...
They should have traded down.You're not happy about the pick? Seems like Jets picked up one of the best players in the draft...
Peat was pretty good once he moved to guard. Which is why this pick makes sense.
Zach Strief is playing on borrowed time. He was a concern coming into last season, but he pulled another good year out of himself. He can't do that forever. In a draft short on OL talent at the top, it's better to spend a pick on one of the best and play it out in terms of switching him from LT to RT than pass on it..
Predictions for tonight
fletcher cox ✔ @fcoxx_91
@dbarnett25 welcome rookie I like my steaks medium ##FlyEaglesFly
9:54 PM - 27 Apr 2017
I almost wonder if the Eagles just sit at 43 and take the BPA on their board. Does that mean of the best rated OTs continue to slide, like Cam, do they take him?
Just like Barnett (DE) solidifies the DLine especially since all their current DE are at or older than 30, taking a top rated T with the 2nd round pick might solidify the line behind Lane and Peters.
Yes, they kick the need at CB down another round BUT it would be true to sticking to the BPA on their board.
Wouldn't be made about it at all.
Also back to Barnett - before the draft I didn't think he would be there at 14. So I should be ecstatic he was there and they took the DE who had similar production to the #1 pick BUT the months of mocks and draft hype really drilled into my head that guys like Hooker, OJ Howard, and Foster were top 10 locks and to see them on the board I just assumed they would be the BPA on the Eagles board too.
Of course, every team's scouting and GM has a different board and ultimately in terms of position DE only ranks below QB but man did I want Foster.
OT isn't really a need, and I doubt that Cam or any of the OL talent is BPA. I'd honestly rather roll with Big V for a season and watch his development than take any of the OL talent this early. He wasn't great but he was a rookie. There's too many good corners and I could also see them taking (or even trading above Cincy) Cook
Would you have taken the chiefs or Texans trade? I was really high on Adams so I wouldn't, but I can see the argument for it. Especially with how so many top players slid down into the 20s.They should have traded down.
Besides he will still end up being a bum.
Plus he has an idiot for a head coach who doesn't understand secondaries as seen by the last 2 years of his defense.
Right but you are arguing needs at CB over BPA.
If on their board the BPA is Cam and they had a 1st round grade on him then they should take him at 43! Though in general I always prefer to load up on defensive players through the draft.
Also reading more on Barnett and the kid has his head on right. Lack of or questionable character def contributed to Foster sliding.
I feel like for the QB situation, Cleveland's praying they can find the next Dak Prescott somewhere in the 3rd but they're not gonna be too bothered if they have to ride it out with Kessler for a year. They're stocking up on 2018 picks for a reason.
I don't like this Dutch..