Nintendogs - 3 Different Versions?

Oogami said:
Because it's cheaper to buy a real dog and pet it yourself than to buy a DS and 3 versions of the same game!
Good thing you don't have to feed dogs for more than 1 month, or take them to the vet, or other shit.
 
Oogami said:
Because it's cheaper to buy a real dog and pet it yourself than to buy a DS and 3 versions of the same game! Just think about it! Pokemon and Tamagotchi sells because they aren't real and you can't buy one for real. Normal dogs though, you can get one for cheap. Free even if your neighbor or friends give you one after their dog just gives birth to too many puppies. I know many did. Make no sense to pet a real thing in digital form.

Uh, it's a LOT cheaper to get the game. Not that I suggest anyone to rush out and buy Nintendogs, but a dog isn't really cheap what with shots, food, toys, etc...
 
what kind of stuff you're feeding your dogs? just let them go around in the park then they'll find something to eat, no?

$200 for virtual puppies is too much for kids/women imo.
 
Interesting move. It could probably work with a game like this.

Man, this is a tough decision. Corgi and Shiba or Beagle and Labrador Retriever?
 
huzkee said:
Am I the only one that thinks Nintendo should leave the japanese title of this game for the world too? It looks great on those covers.

Also, since we're a bunch of pooch lovers I think you guys will appreciate this site. Oli, don't get too excited.

nice link. too cute :lol

the covers for this game are amazing. that'll sell a few copies for sure.
 
Amir0x said:
Who is trolling? Oh, are you suggesting everyone should be pleased?

Perhaps I misspoke. I just meant that Nintendogs seems like such a bland, inoffensive game that any strong reaction to it surprises me. I just don't know why any one would bother to take the time to come in and bitch about it, especially when it is so obviously not marketed towards you. To me, complaining about Nintendogs is like complaining about those Leapfrog Learning Pad things. I mean, I have no intention of buying one of those, but I could see where a different audience would enjoy them. I have the same view towards Nintendogs, and complaining about them. Is a game where you play jump rope with puppies and throw them balls truely a genre that you care so much about that you would take the time to have multiple posts about how much you dislike it? I hope I do not offend you, and if I do I am deeply sorry, I am just trying to clarify what I said.
 
ohamsie said:
Perhaps I misspoke. I just meant that Nintendogs seems like such a bland, inoffensive game that any strong reaction to it surprises me. I just don't know why any one would bother to take the time to come in and bitch about it, especially when it is so obviously not marketed towards you. To me, complaining about Nintendogs is like complaining about those Leapfrog Learning Pad things. I mean, I have no intention of buying one of those, but I could see where a different audience would enjoy them. I have the same view towards Nintendogs, and complaining about them. Is a game where you play jump rope with puppies and throw them balls truely a genre that you care so much about that you would take the time to have multiple posts about how much you dislike it? I hope I do not offend you, and if I do I am deeply sorry, I am just trying to clarify what I said.
You're right, but know that the "Nintendo" part of "Nintendogs" that is causing the reaction, not necessarily the game... "negative" points about Nintendo products are seeminly fun to point out...
 
My Girlfriend is going to scream "Soooooo cuuuute!!!!" when she sees those covers. She's not interested in gaming in the least... but at least once a week she asks about this game. It's going to be massive. I'm looking forward to it too I must admit.
 
All the complaints around here are because this is a Nintendo game and all the Nintendogs are forced to buy it even knowing they don't want to play it but somehow forced to buy it so in revenge they bitches about it but forced to buy it.
 
Oogami said:
All the complaints around here are because this is a Nintendo game and all the Nintendogs are forced to buy it even knowing they don't want to play it but somehow forced to buy it so in revenge they bitches about it but forced to buy it.
there aren't too many "Nintendogs" doing any b*tching...

in fact the most prominent critic isn't even interested in the game, as he pointed out "he likes arguing" is the given reason for his many attacks
 
Oogami said:
All the complaints around here are because this is a Nintendo game and all the Nintendogs are forced to buy it even knowing they don't want to play it but somehow forced to buy it so in revenge they bitches about it but forced to buy it.

I don't think anyone here really gives a shit if it's from Nintendo, Square or Osama. The point is when a game does something lame like this, it's bad for the customer but great for the publisher. We see something lame and we call it. If you're not happy with it you can go back to your cave, no one will miss you. :D
 
duckroll said:
We see something lame and we call it. If you're not happy with it you can go back to your cave, no one will miss you. :D

It doesn't even make sense. So if you want to complain you're free to do so. But yet if I'm not happy and want to complain, I can't do that and have to go back to my cave. :(
 
Does no one else believe trading to be a good gameplay feature (if you can find people, wish I didn't have to add this disclaimer)? Obviously Nintendo aren't going to ignore the fact that this might lead to greater sales, but I honestly think they put in this sort of trading for gameplay reasons as much as anything else.

In fact, making three versions may not even help Nintendo that much, from the sales side. One Pokemon game always sells more than the other, if not by a huge amount, and in that game people are basically going in blind when they make their choice. They're probably just picking on which colour they prefer or which cover monster looks better to them, but as for which games have which monsters, they're not that likely to know.

With Nintendogs it's different. There are only 5 puppies in each game, and given how prominent they are on the website, I'm sure they'll be shown on the back of the box. Now if Nintendo aren't careful, they could really fuck up the sales of one version. They need to make sure they get the right balance and don't let one of them have an unpopular line up of dogs. It's inevitable that sales of one copy will be worst than the others as it is, they don't want to escalate the problem.

As for Oogami's comments...*shakes head* It's so annoying when someone new joins a forum and makes comments like they have any idea of people's personalities or tastes.
 
ohamsie said:
I'm just glad that they apparently decided to stick with Nintendogs, rather than call it Puppy Times.

And I can't believe there are people actually trolling this game.

Is it not Puppy Times in the US?

IF Nintendo had the balls enough to leave the box art just the way it is with Japanese and all
this would get people very curious here in the states it could become bigger than Pokemon

The cuteness is amazing and I don't even like dogs

P.S. I am in shock of all the bitching here damn people this is not even the type of game grown men should bitch about
 
Mama Smurf said:
Does no one else believe trading to be a good gameplay feature (if you can find people, wish I didn't have to add this disclaimer)? Obviously Nintendo aren't going to ignore the fact that this might lead to greater sales, but I honestly think they put in this sort of trading for gameplay reasons as much as anything else.

I seriously doubt it's for gameplay reasons. Because in what way? It's not like you can link battle like in Pokemon. Plus there're only 15 dogs in total, I seriously doubt the trading features will be such a big thing as in 500+ Pokemon lineups.

As for Oogami's comments...*shakes head* It's so annoying when someone new joins a forum and makes comments like they have any idea of people's personalities or tastes.

Well I've been in this forum for over 5 years. But yeah I was just joking in some of my previous posts. My apology if I offended anyone.
 
Mama Smurf said:
With Nintendogs it's different. There are only 5 puppies in each game, and given how prominent they are on the website, I'm sure they'll be shown on the back of the box. Now if Nintendo aren't careful, they could really fuck up the sales of one version. They need to make sure they get the right balance and don't let one of them have an unpopular line up of dogs. It's inevitable that sales of one copy will be worst than the others as it is, they don't want to escalate the problem.
So true, and it seems they need to work on that, unless Japan is different in terms of popular dog breeds, and I wouldn't doubt it, but based on American tastes the "Shiba & friends" game needs a different lineup. The majority of dogs in "Dachs & Friends" and "Chihuahua & Friends", are commonly found in the top 10 AKC registrations. Shiba really only seems to have the Poodle.

Though of course these are being catered to Japanese tastes, and perhaps things look a lot more balanced. But I think it would be rather nice if NOA merged the third title with the other two, but that would never happen, they'd be more likely to drop it if they felt it wouldn't sell.

Regardless I'm torn between which games to get. I think I might just get the one with the Lab and Beagle for myself (my favorite breeds), and get the one with the Corgi for my sister. However I wish I could get the other one as well as I so want the German Shepherd and Dachshund. Gah, talk about a hit in the wallet.

Anywho, where the hell is Drinky? Surely this thread should have been hijacked by now. :/
 
Mama Smurf said:
Does no one else believe trading to be a good gameplay feature (if you can find people, wish I didn't have to add this disclaimer)? Obviously Nintendo aren't going to ignore the fact that this might lead to greater sales, but I honestly think they put in this sort of trading for gameplay reasons as much as anything else.

I had a dream...


[connecting]

[welcome to **********]

[choose location]

touch* Tokyo, Japan

>Smiley Girl (NYC USA)

Hello all... I would like to trade my Pug for a ???????

>Kawaii Girl (TOKYO, JPN)

A Pug! >_< eek!

I love Pugs! Please Trade!

/dream



Nintendo is not STUPID you don't make Billions by being Stupid
 
I wonder what version (if not a demo) Nintendo's currently running here in the Netherlands. Apparantly, in their promotional tour they've got the Kirby game and Nintendogs running on the units. Might go check it out next saturday.
 
Oogami said:
I seriously doubt it's for gameplay reasons. Because in what way? It's not like you can link battle like in Pokemon. Plus there're only 15 dogs in total, I seriously doubt the trading features will be such a big thing as in 500+ Pokemon lineups.

No one said it'd be as big, but it can still be for gameplay feature. And linking up will let different puppies play together which'll be nice.
 
Not interested unless dogs can sniff each others butts and exhibit other lifelike dog behaviour.

On second thought...

DSdog.gif


Nintendog GET!
 
Smiles and Cries said:
I had a dream...


[connecting]

[welcome to **********]

[choose location]

touch* Tokyo, Japan

>Smiley Girl (NYC USA)

Hello all... I would like to trade my Pug for a ???????

>Kawaii Girl (TOKYO, JPN)

A Pug! >_< eek!

I love Pugs! Please Trade!

/dream



Nintendo is not STUPID you don't make Billions by being Stupid


Given Nintendo's current online situation, "dream" is a good way to put this scenario
 
didn't read the thread, so i don't know how people feel about the 3 versions.

in any case, they totally have the right idea for the marketing. Nintendo should keep the same exact box art worldwide. a name like Puppy Times in that font would make a lot of sense, and makes the new sound less retarded now. although Nintendogs is still a much cooler name.

anyways, this game could potentially be that first "huge" game that DS needs. the fact that the dogs listen to your voice commands too should be a big selling point. i expect some really great commericials for this one.
 
I don't quite get this game. Is it a Sims-like game? Do you gain some kind of experience for your dogs? Or is it just an interactive playroom with AI-controlled dogs?
 
Kiriku said:
I don't quite get this game. Is it a Sims-like game? Do you gain some kind of experience for your dogs? Or is it just an interactive playroom with AI-controlled dogs?
i guess you could call it a tamagotchi type of thing. you name your dogs and raise them. they listen to your voice commands, and you play with them with the touch screen by doing all kinds of cool shit.

http://www.gamespot.com/ds/strategy/nintendogs/index.html?q=puppy+times
 
I really don't have anything to add to this thread. It just kinda speaks for itself, y'know? Besides, I wouldn't know where to start.

Anyway, when you Nintendo types start liking actual GAMES again, call me, m'kay?

(Bonus points, though, to the dude who said you should hang out staring at kids' pockets to see if they have a DS in them. That's just like the nastiest frosting on this shitcake of a thread. You win, man! You win!)
 
Drinky Crow said:
(Bonus points, though, to the dude who said you should hang out staring at kids' pockets to see if they have a DS in them. That's just like the nastiest frosting on this shitcake of a thread. You win, man! You win!)

who posted that? Eww :lol :lol :lol
 
human5892 said:
This thread has far and away surpassed the expectations I had for a Nintendogs thread.

Not me....where the fuck is Drinky?!

Drinky Crow said:
I really don't have anything to add to this thread. It just kinda speaks for itself, y'know? Besides, I wouldn't know where to start.

Anyway, when you Nintendo types start liking actual GAMES again, call me, m'kay?

(Bonus points, though, to the dude who said you should hang out staring at kids' pockets to see if they have a DS in them. That's just like the nastiest frosting on this shitcake of a thread. You win, man! You win!)

<whew>, there he is. Now, I can rest easy.
 
It's not a game. It's not something I give a shit about. But, for what it is, Nintendo has the right strategy here. Different versions (I wonder if the Sales Data will split them up; if they do I say we start taking bets now) is a brilliant idea for selling this type of software. Like the idea of the thing or not, Nintendo is setting up a chance for this to become a phenomenon.
 
Dammit, I want Dachsund, Beagle, Sheltie & Corgi. *sigh*

Also, no Border Collie is a travesty.
 
It's funny because it's one of the few DS title that I'm genuinely interested it. This game will be a hit with dog lovers. I'm importing it :lol. I really want to know if the puppies actually grow into adult dogs.

When is this coming out? SO MANY QUESTIONS
 
Well, nintendo.co.jp says it's released april 21. Same day as the pink and blue DS versions. :)
I suspect that since they don't mention it anywhere the dogs do not grow up, though I hope I'm wrong about that.
 
My girlfriend already plays more of my DS than I do. This will only augment her playtime. In fact, I think I'll probably get her a DS with a different color when they come out. She's already pining for one.

Dachsund version for me. One with lab for her. I like this idea. But I own at least one version of every Pokémon game. So take from that what you will.
 
huzkee said:
Nintendo should release the more hardcore version of these games too:
Nintendawgs and Nintenbitches

Photoshoppers go at it.

You forgot these:

Nintendogs [insert random colour here]
Nintendogs Colosseum
Nintendogs Tournament
Nintendogs Adventure
Nintendogs Revolution
 
Top Bottom