Henry Panic
Banned
What's funny about the post is Pokemon is the nickname, and Pocket Monsters is the actual title.
You're entirely missing the point. The case is not at all because Monster thinks this is relevant to their brand, it's because going after small companies means they are more likely to settle, and a trail of people settling these lawsuits is a way for them to establish a record of defending their IP.To a degree. It's valid to go after another drink trying to use the word "monster" to protect you drink brand TM.
No one would have been confused by a video game titled "Dark Deception: Monsters & Mortals" or even consider it to have anything to do with Monster Energy.
Scrolls of the Edge Monster would be even betterIf I ever make a game, I will call it Edge Monster
Seems to be working for Disney, Bud light, Nike, Balenciaga, M&M's, Jack Daniels, etc etcStay relevant by making everyone hate them?
You're entirely missing the point. The case is not at all because Monster thinks this is relevant to their brand, it's because going after small companies means they are more likely to settle, and a trail of people settling these lawsuits is a way for them to establish a record of defending their IP.
The case is not at all because Monster thinks this is relevant to their brand, it's because going after small companies means they are more likely to settle, and a trail of people settling these lawsuits is a way for them to establish a record of defending their IP.
Is this the equivalent of a blank stare? Your non-verbal protest is both brave and stunning!
Mine : Give me some energy, monster !If I ever make a game, I will call it Edge Monster
Attack of the Energy drinking MonsterMine : Give me some energy, monster !
Doesn't Monster have a higher market share than Red Bull?They can't compete with Red Bull, so I guess this is their strategy to stay relevant.
Uff is that so? I don't drink either of them, I just knew that Red Bull has 2 Formula 1 teams and must be very successful.Doesn't Monster have a higher market share than Red Bull?
Before there was Monster Energy, there was Monster Cable, which did the same trademark trolling. They got VI l caught up though when somehow they tangled with Disney over Monsters Inc.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123869022704882969
This sounds like jewish monster lawyer logic. I'll have none of it, on this holiday! BegoneYou're entirely missing the point. The case is not at all because Monster thinks this is relevant to their brand, it's because going after small companies means they are more likely to settle, and a trail of people settling these lawsuits is a way for them to establish a record of defending their IP.
If they don't do this, their IP could be considered invalid on the grounds that they have failed to defend it.
So there's incentive for them to just bully small companies that can't defend themselves and there's really no incentive for them not to other than, I suppose, bas publicity. It's really a dumb system but that is the way trademark law works in this country.
In the US, world wide red bull is no.1 at like 8 billion in sales, some china only drink number 2 with 6 billion and then monster with 4 billion....Doesn't Monster have a higher market share than Red Bull?
Thats not the topic retardMonster is waaaaay better then redbull
Yeah, lets take a monster lawsuit over the word "monster" seriously and i m the retard oneThats not the topic retard
Edge Monster SagaIf I ever make a game, I will call it Edge Monster
I don't care how much of a bad muthafucka you think you are as a lawyer, going up against Disney is surely suicide with such a frivolous lawsuit. They probably have more lawyers than some countries have soldiers.Before there was Monster Energy, there was Monster Cable, which did the same trademark trolling. They got VI l caught up though when somehow they tangled with Disney over Monsters Inc.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123869022704882969
Lady Gaga?What's next Monster Jam and Monster Trucks?