• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Noel Gallagher interviewed in Esquire UK

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bronx-Man

Banned
Noah's right, there's only one rock star in music today that actually acts like a fucking rock star.

Kanye-chain.jpg
 
They were no Pulp.

pulp were better than oasis, but i don't think i'd put them in the top 10 either



charming guy!

You're alright.

i saw pulp live in '01, I've never been so disappointed with a show since or before.
in retrospect 80% of their songs were crap and even their good stuff got old rather quickly. at least with oasis including all the b-side tracks they didn't make a bad song for their first three albums. can't listen to oasis nowadays though, it actually makes me sick to my stomach. not because it's bad but because of how much I loved them and I just can't relate to that anymore.

Shame on you.
 

Weasley

Member
Someone has to say it out loud so might as well be me: Wonderwall is one of the most overrated songs in the entire universe.
 

Fjordson

Member
This guy is high. Oasis were a flash in the pan. They're nobodies.
I think they're pretty much the opposite of a flash in the pan.

how can you not be disappointed if you go to a pulp concert and they didn't play common people? it's almost as bad as when I went to roskilde and suffered through half a week of meter deep mud and rain with the sole purpose of seeing bowie perform, then he gets ill and they replace it with fucking slipknot. that night I actually questioned my existence.
Yeah, I'd be pretty disappointed. Common People is way way better than any of their other records.
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
I think what gets Noel is Oasis were the face of an era than really doesn't hold up too well. Britpop was too backward looking to really stand the test of time, unlike the Madchester scene which was forward-looking and produced a genuinely great album in The Stone Roses.

Blur could see it at the time and dumped it overnight, Oasis just tried to hang onto it. Beetlebum alone put Oasis in their place, Noel even grudgingly praised it at the time saying he could never have written it. Blur moved on and proved themselves as a band. Maybe not propelling them into the greats, but contributing more.

So after everything Oasis is the face of an era with not even the best Britpop album to go with it, which was Pulp's Different Class.
 

Drahcir

Member
So after everything Oasis is the face of an era with not even the best Britpop album to go with it, which was Pulp's Different Class.

I can't argue with that. :) For my money though, I think Suede was overall the best band of the britpop era.
 

sploatee

formerly Oynox Slider
I remember the 90s! Everyone in school was trading Oasis tapes and I was into Seattle grunge.

But Oasis were the only band I've ever lived through that almost made it a monoculture. Here in Manchester we had an Oasis café ffs. It was a bit like how I imagine the Beatles would've been, except Oasis stiffed a bit in America (at least that was the consensus at the time, given how huge they were in the UK).

I think if they'd split after Morning Glory there'd be no dispute about their place in the "canon" (ugh that word). But when Be Here Now came out there was such a buzz everywhere, it had to be as good as Sgt. Pepper's really to stand a chance, and Oasis just weren't that versatile and were too dependent on one man.

I know it's mega clichéd to say, but the rest of their albums are just so flat apart from a few really good singles.

Either way I fucking love Noel and Liam. Long may they talk absolute bollocks. Oasis were a unique band in the UK and Europe and it's a shame they never took over America just to fill those US TV channels with utter gobshite-ry.
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
I can't argue with that. :) For my money though, I think Suede was overall the best band of the britpop era.

Definitely the most creative.

I always saw Suede as more lumped in with Britpop rather than being a part of it though.
 
Noah's right, there's only one rock star in music today that actually acts like a fucking rock star.



does he?

i haven't heard any kanye drug stories. It's more like "he's got good beats" and "he's a good businessman" zzzzzz


Fela Kuti had a compound where it was just orgies and drugs 24/7

does kanye have a sex/drug compound. or does he just interrupt people on tv or something
 

moozoom

Member
Still the same pretentious prick as he ever was, bragging about drugs, money, fist fights and unfunny pranks.

Saw them in Reading or Glastonbury (don't remember) in the nineties and it confirmed the fact that they were poor imitations of the real british rock bands that existed before them. There are lots of stoned musicians that produced way better music in the 90's than the insufferable "wonderwall".

And it's no wonder he hated Damon Albarn, the guy is actually able to write pop, rock and very different styles of music and is incredibly productive. (and made Gorillaz)

Sidenote : Pulp was fantastic in concert. Jarvis Cocker is incredible on stage, and is super funny when he talks between the songs.
 

Cindres

Vied for a tag related to cocks, so here it is.
Still the same pretentious prick as he ever was, bragging about drugs, money, fist fights and unfunny pranks.

Saw them in Reading or Glastonbury (don't remember) in the nineties and it confirmed the fact that they were poor imitations of the real british rock bands that existed before them. There are lots of stoned musicians that produced way better music in the 90's than the insufferable "wonderwall".

And it's no wonder he hated Damon Albarn, the guy is actually able to write pop, rock and very different styles of music and is incredibly productive. (and made Gorillaz)

Sidenote : Pulp was fantastic in concert. Jarvis Cocker is incredible on stage, and is super funny when he talks between the songs.

Honestly I think he just tries too hard to be what he thinks a rockstar is.

It's fucking hilarious, but I really do think he's a giant prick. Oasis have some great hits, but they were never really up there for me.
 

kmag

Member
I remember the 90s! Everyone in school was trading Oasis tapes and I was into Seattle grunge.

But Oasis were the only band I've ever lived through that almost made it a monoculture. Here in Manchester we had an Oasis café ffs. It was a bit like how I imagine the Beatles would've been, except Oasis stiffed a bit in America (at least that was the consensus at the time, given how huge they were in the UK).

I think if they'd split after Morning Glory there'd be no dispute about their place in the "canon" (ugh that word). But when Be Here Now came out there was such a buzz everywhere, it had to be as good as Sgt. Pepper's really to stand a chance, and Oasis just weren't that versatile and were too dependent on one man.

I know it's mega clichéd to say, but the rest of their albums are just so flat apart from a few really good singles.

Either way I fucking love Noel and Liam. Long may they talk absolute bollocks. Oasis were a unique band in the UK and Europe and it's a shame they never took over America just to fill those US TV channels with utter gobshite-ry.

The main reason they stiffed in the US, was they were never really prepared to put the effort required to break into the States. Even as late as the 90's a starting band had to constantly tour press the flesh with the local radio stations, tour some more. Even given the unreliable nature of Oasis, it's always been hard for successful British bands who can get fame quickly in the UK to 'slum' it in those opening US tours. Oasis didn't have the will power for that.

Oasis as Noel admits could never really get a run at that. At their 'peak' the Morning Story US tour consisted of 3 legs over 15 months of about 8-12 shows each, with a number of cancellations and Liam walking out of a tour. They never really recovered from that, and as the quality of their output fell off a cliff they missed the boat.
 
The Stone Roses were still a level above you though, sorry Noel.
Absolutely. I never understood any love for Oasis.. Dumb hair, misplaced arrogance and really really boring pop-songs.

Is it wrong that I'm a Northerner and preferred Blur to Oasis.

No man. Damon Albarn alone is way more talented than the whole fucking band of Oasis. And i'm not even a big Blur fan (though i def. like some of their songs and some of Albarn's projects)
 

Polari

Member
He's right about Thom Yorke's singing.

Also, the Roses might have only kept it together for one album, but that album was better than anything Oasis produced.
 

Daffy Duck

Member
This new generation of rock stars, they look great: Alex Turner, Miles Kane, the guys from Royal Blood. They’ve got the fucking skinny jeans and the boots, and all that eyeliner. I’ve got a cat that’s more rock’n’roll than all of them put together. Pigeons? Rips their fucking heads off.

I go back to this: fame is fucking wasted on these people. The new generation of rock stars, when have they ever said anything that made you laugh? When have they ever said anything you remember? People say, “They’re interesting.” Interesting! That’s a word that’s crept in to music: “Yeah, man. Have you heard the new Skrillex record?” “No.” “Yeah, man. It’s really interesting.” I don’t want interesting! Rock’n’roll’s not about that. To me, it’s about fucking utter gobshites just being fucking headcases. Well, not headcases. But what I want, genuinely, is somebody with a fucking drug habit, who’s not Pete Doherty. Do you know what I mean?

He's not wrong. I saw him Jonathon Ross a while ago and he was brilliant on that too. Guy is "interesting". :D :D
 

samn

Member
Dreadful dreadful man.

No doubt the authorities will turn a blind eye to his admissions of drug taking
 
Meh, Oasis is dad rock at its worst. I guess they inspired one generation of brits but they really are icon of dad rock. I don't care about the personas of band members.

If anything more bands should be more like Radiohead. Just make good music. I don't care about how much you can snort cocaine and how many models you bang.
 

King_Moc

Banned
I swear that Noel and his idiot brother are like the Jeremy Clarkson's of low rent rock 'n' roll. They seem to only exist to create nonsensical, ludicrous opinions.

Still the same pretentious prick as he ever was, bragging about drugs, money, fist fights and unfunny pranks.

Saw them in Reading or Glastonbury (don't remember) in the nineties and it confirmed the fact that they were poor imitations of the real british rock bands that existed before them. There are lots of stoned musicians that produced way better music in the 90's than the insufferable "wonderwall".

And it's no wonder he hated Damon Albarn, the guy is actually able to write pop, rock and very different styles of music and is incredibly productive. (and made Gorillaz)

Sidenote : Pulp was fantastic in concert. Jarvis Cocker is incredible on stage, and is super funny when he talks between the songs.

Never a truer word said.
 

chiimisu

Member
Pulp is the best of the "big 4". Suede is 2nd. Oasis and Blur are tied so... yeah.

Still, love the guy. I love reading his interviews when I'm down lol.
But Jarvis's still better. Nice to see all the Pulp love in the thread by the way.
 

Diablos

Member
Am I aware of a hierarchy? I’m aware that Radiohead have never had a fucking bad review. I reckon if Thom Yorke fucking shit into a light bulb and started blowing it like an empty beer bottle it’d probably get 9 out of 10 in fucking Mojo. I’m aware of that.
Hahaha.

I love Radiohead and, at best, like Oasis (as in a few of their songs) but this is just funny.

Noel Gallagher is a Grade A asshole, no doubt about that though. I generally can't stand most of the shit he says. His music is overrated.
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Noah's right, there's only one rock star in music today that actually acts like a fucking rock star.

This is true.

Oasis was my first concert so I have a soft spot for them. I was all-in until BHN but drifted out. I like High Flying Birds. Maybe one day I'll swing back.

If anything more bands should be more like Radiohead. Just make good music. I don't care about how much you can snort cocaine and how many models you bang.

(1) Radiohead is putting on an act too, it's just one you're more personally fond of, and (2) when was the last time they made good music?
 

Lothars

Member
Oasis still has some of the best albums ever released, They are definitely up there and I do like Blur but Oasis is way better than them.
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
I wouldn't even put Oasis ahead of fucking Suede let alone Blur and Pulp.

No one would really, that's what is still niggling him.

Britpop captured the times, but in all honesty it wasn't very good. It was just British music eating itself, recycling the 60's as something new to sell to a country that wanted to feel great again. It doesn't really hold up because of that. The Madchester bands which predated it - The Stone Roses, Primal Scream, Happy Mondays, The Charlatans - and Blur who literally left the UK to escape it come out better looking back.

No one had really anything to say apart from this is how we can get rich. Britpop was all quite cynical, and it fell apart when they did. Pulp's Different Class stood out amongst it all because it actually had some substance to it, but it was the exception and the public didn't take too long to catch on.

For all his rock and roll tales, this is the image of Oasis and Britpop:

blairgallagher460.jpg


It was all a bit bollocks.
 
(1) Radiohead is putting on an act too, it's just one you're more personally fond of, and (2) when was the last time they made good music?

(1) Haven't really seen them putting up on an act. Then again I haven't seen nor read all that many Radiohead interviews. So maybe I have missed their best bits. What's their shtick? If Noel's is "grumpy old rocker who tells it like it is" then what are Radiohead? edit. only "act" I remember was that Miley Cyrus spat that wasn't really a spat.

(2) For me their last good album was In Rainbows. Nothing wrong with King of Limbs, it's just not for me. I'm glad Radiohead at least try doing something new and creative instead of same sounds over and over again. Noel's solo stuff sounds like 90s brit rock. Yorke's solo stuff is acid to my ears but it's still better then Noel's dad rock. Greenwood has been pumping out good stuff alone, man can do no wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom