• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

November EGM scores

Battalion Wars is more of a 3.0 type of game. Jesus, do you go in prepared to like any game just because it has the Nintendo badge on the boxart?
 
Drinky Crow said:
Battalion Wars is more of a 3.0 type of game. Jesus, do you go in prepared to like any game just because it has the Nintendo badge on the boxart?

Zeo thinks Splinter Cell DS deserves a 7+. enough said
 
Drinky Crow said:
Battalion Wars is more of a 3.0 type of game. Jesus, do you go in prepared to like any game just because it has the Nintendo badge on the boxart?

Do you do the same for Sony badge???Oh wait you're impartial you dont hate or love any particular brand..... :lol
 
calidor posted some PD0 info from the other age:

What could possibly go wrong? A lot of stuff, actually. Zero's multiplayer modes, which include special dark-ops missions that have players taking on roles, are ambitious and will require heavy play balancing. We also hope the number of supported players doesn't drop once again. The latest version we tried got a bit choppy at times, but Rare is promising that the final game will run at 30 frames per second (about as smoothly as Halo 2, but not the blazing speed we'd expect of a next-generation title).





HUAUAHUAHUAUHAUH 30 FPS
 
Trauma Center rocks, despite the fact that Zeo endorses it. It's the first DS game to justify the presence of the stylus. Plus the plot is wacky as all hell!
 
Drinky Crow said:
Trauma Center rocks, despite the fact that Zeo endorses it. It's the first DS game to justify the presence of the stylus. Plus the plot is wacky as all hell!

*watches hell freeze over*
 
Jeff-DSA said:
Burnout Legends 8.5/9.0/9.0

I'm sorry, but after playing this for as long as I could, I can't agree with this sort of score. The loading while playing crash mode was unbearable. The racing is good, but it's not 9.0 good.

EGM play it from the Memory Stick so Loading times was good. :D
 
pj325is said:
It doesn't matter which ones gave those scores. Very few of their scores are accurate and the ones that are probably got that way by accident or typo. I don't think there has ever been a magazine with this many scores I disagree with in a single month.

baby_crying_closeup.jpg
 
Castlevania: DoS is rightfully Game on Month. The game rocks!

Let me guess, the guy who gave it an 8.5
sucked and got the bad ending when there are still much to do in the main quest
 
Drinky Crow said:
Battalion Wars is more of a 3.0 type of game. Jesus, do you go in prepared to like any game just because it has the Nintendo badge on the boxart?

Nah, I just like good games. You'd have to be retarded to think Battalion Wars is a 3.0 type of game.

Drinky Crow said:
Trauma Center rocks, despite the fact that Zeo endorses it. It's the first DS game to justify the presence of the stylus. Plus the plot is wacky as all hell!

You didn't play Kirby or Advance Wars I'm guessing.
 
Zeo, the best part of playing through Advance Wars DS was that I never had to touch the stylus even once. (Well, I did ONCE, and found it grossly inferior to the D-pad.)
 
Drinky Crow said:
Zeo, the best part of playing through Advance Wars DS was that I never had to touch the stylus even once. (Well, I did ONCE, and found it grossly inferior to the D-pad.)

Very strange. The best part about AWDS is that you could use the stylus. You couldn't possibly act like the game didn't flow better with touch screen control.

(And you didn't address Kirby.)
 
SantaCruZer said:
um that's good scores you know.

Good scores, but I said "love". Besides, it's very odd that a game of this magnitude and ambition can score lower than the latest edition of 2D Castlevania.
 
Black_Mamba said:
Good scores, but I said "love". Besides, it's very odd that a game of this magnitude and ambition can score lower than the latest edition of 2D Castlevania.

lol, a new 2D Castlevania is usually teh shit you know! It's nothing to be ashamed of. As for the scores you listed most of them are in the "9s", that's definitley love.
 
Drinky Crow said:
Zeo, the best part of playing through Advance Wars DS was that I never had to touch the stylus even once. (Well, I did ONCE, and found it grossly inferior to the D-pad.)


im sorry but this is just retard in every single way..........this just sounds like a holy quest to try to prove that the touch screen doesnt work, even if the title in question fits like a glove for this type of device....next thing you gonna tell me is that you dont use the mouse to play the same type of games on your pc.... :lol
 
Zeo said:
Very strange. The best part about AWDS is that you could use the stylus. You couldn't possibly act like the game didn't flow better with touch screen control.

(And you didn't address Kirby.)

If I recall correctly, Drinky thought it was a fun diversion but didn't hold his interest long, causing him to sell it. Oh yeah, and the ink trials suck. Which I agree with.

Still awesome though :)
 
Suburban Cowboy said:
suprised no one has mentioned far cry, arent those score disappointing or was the game supposed to be mediocre


well i didnt think it was mediocre. I asked on the first page if other people who played the game thought it deserved the TWO 6.5's but nobody responded.
 
Zeo said:
Very strange. The best part about AWDS is that you could use the stylus. You couldn't possibly act like the game didn't flow better with touch screen control.

(And you didn't address Kirby.)

Look, I loved AW:DS but that's just flat out not true. Stylus control was terrible compared to the D-pad in any mode other than combat mode. I touched it once and went back to the much better d-pad.
 
I'm one of the bigger Advance Wars fanboys on this board, and I never used the stylus once to play AWDS. I'm just used to moving the cursor using the dpad.

However, I did use the stylus to play Meteos and Nightmare Troubador. Works like a charm with those games. I LIKE the fact that with many DS games if you choose to use the dpad and buttons, you can.
 
Very nice SotC scores. So far it's getting 9s or very close to it, much like Ico was getting from most bigger publications. Gives me the faith that it'll deliver the same greatness, that not everyone will like :P

I have a feeling Virtua Tennis got robbed in that one 6. Why such low score?
 
Of the entire two games in that review list I've played (Burnout Revenge and Katamari) I'd say the scores were dead on. If the Shadow and Castlevania DS scores are as accurate, I have nothing to worry about.

About those DS games, I won't be buying or playing them, but the way they were hyped around here, the scores do seem a little on the low side.
 
jman2050 said:
If I recall correctly, Drinky thought it was a fun diversion but didn't hold his interest long, causing him to sell it. Oh yeah, and the ink trials suck. Which I agree with.

Still awesome though :)

But even not liking it, which is fine (although strange!), you can't logically say that it wasn't a good use of the stylus.
 
Wait a sec, I just checked the September and October EGM threads, and there wasn't a review for Lost in Blue. Wonder if it slipped under the radar again. hrmm
 
SotC review:

Mark - The graphics are gorgeous but choppy, at times chugging along with entire mountains suddenly popping into view. And even with constant manual adjustments, the camera swings so wildly at times it's hard to tell what's going on.

Shane - The aging PS2 simply can't keep up, so ever-present slowdown, pop-up, and glitches assault your eyes. Shadow's gameplay leads to head-scratching, too: It's desolate, empty world, purposefully convoluted control scheme, and unexpected ending all add to its otherwordly mystique

Joe - Basically just says the game has complex controls and that it's 'art.'


They really have nothing good to say about the game other than it's great looking and evokes emotion, but it got a 9, 9, 8.5???
 
siege said:
SotC review:

Mark - The graphics are gorgeous but choppy, at times chugging along with entire mountains suddenly popping into view. And even with constant manual adjustments, the camera swings so wildly at times it's hard to tell what's going on.

Shane - The aging PS2 simply can't keep up, so ever-present slowdown, pop-up, and glitches assault your eyes. Shadow's gameplay leads to head-scratching, too: It's desolate, empty world, purposefully convoluted control scheme, and unexpected ending all add to its otherwordly mystique

Joe - Basically just says the game has complex controls and that it's 'art.'


They really have nothing good to say about the game other than it's great looking and evokes emotion, but it got a 9, 9, 8.5???

Che played and beat the game and he had no problems with the controls and said the frame rate was great. What are these guys talking about?
 
this just sounds like a holy quest to try to prove that the touch screen doesnt work, even if the title in question fits like a glove for this type of device....next thing you gonna tell me is that you dont use the mouse to play the same type of games on your pc....

The stylus isn't analogous to a mouse in every context. In the case of Advance Wars, it's far less precise than a mouse and obstructs the visibility of the screen, and is far less comfortable to use during a protracted gaming session than a mouse. It also requires some use of depth perception which hinders selection accuracy, as opposed to a mouse whose pointer is part of the actual screen.
 
Drinky is right about AW:DS. The stylus was just way too inprecise. it was like i was touching the screen with a fat finger.
 
Top Bottom