metareferential
Member
The Wii could have been another PS2 if 3rd parties didn't hate Nintendo so much.
Yeah, poor Ninty.
With the incredible infrastructure they put together for online play and digital delivery, third parties really must hate it.
The Wii could have been another PS2 if 3rd parties didn't hate Nintendo so much.
Both?
One group is affecting sales more significantly than the other. (It's not the early adopters)Probably both. Late adopters are waiting for price drops, early adopters are waiting for new consoles.
WTF? Third parties don't hate Nintendo. The HD Consoles + PC are a larger market than the Wii market. Considering the fact that developing for the Wii requires a whole paradigm shift in development, which one do you think most developers will produce games for?The Wii could have been another PS2 if 3rd parties didn't hate Nintendo so much.
I think what's depressing was the lack of interesting titles released in January.
If it wasn't for the Move Mayhem sale I wouldn't have bought anything in January.
Looks like Michael Pachter is questioning the integrity of the NPD data:
http://content.usatoday.com/communi...12/02/sales-of-video-games-fall-in-january-/1
"I don't know if the NPD is getting faulty data, but these numbers make no sense."
Why does everyone keep repeating this as if it's a matter of fact? The collapse of third party support was based on the failure of numerous hardcore third party games in the beginning years of the console.
There is a reason why we are on Just Dance 3 but there is no more de Blob or Elebits or Red Steel.
Nintendo made its own bed with the Wii. Between souring relationships with third parties and scaling back their own first party development for the console.
Hardware:
Xbox 360: 270K (-29%) - 49% Console Hardware Sales Share
This means the Wii and PS3 sold 281K combined, which would be a massive drop from last year. For comparison, the Wii was at 319K and the PS3 at 267K, which comes out to 586K combined. This would put them at an aggregate 52% drop year over year.
It didn't seem unlikely before the last 2 months. Why is everybody acting like they knew it all along? After November, you didnt know it nor anybody else. Things were rolling at that point.
Plus they can do a price cut...with these numbers it would look like the cut would be needed just to match last year at best though.
That's some revisionist history.
Certainly the lack of any real huge breakout 3rd party hit didn't help, but the idea that any real 3rd party support existed in the first place is silly.
The Wii didn't get third party support for a variety of reasons, and it eventually lead to the decline of the console, but at no stage was there any real investment from anyone. That was the problem.
As an aside, de Blob sold really well on the Wii. It was the multi-platform sequel that killed the franchise and got Blue Tongue shut down.
Wii U is a new console, at $350 or less early adopters will flock just for the novelty and superior graphics. The demographic willing to by current gen consoles at $299 is rapidly drying up.So, what do you predict Wii U will be priced at?
You retorted by making assumptions of your own. They were even worse to boot.It will? It's not going to be the same head start 360 had at all. And when the new xbox/ps4 come out, it will be very outclassed in power and developers will make games based on those two consoles and portdown for Wii U. Doesn't look too good to me.
The story of this generation.And Funny enough Udraw which was a massive success on the Wii ended up gettign destroyed as a brand when yet again they decided to take it multiplatform. THQ fucked up 2 strong properties by trying to be greedy
I don't know about hate... but there was certainly a lot of stupidity and little adaptation there.The Wii could have been another PS2 if 3rd parties didn't hate Nintendo so much.
Thinking about prices and next-gen, if the WiiU launches between $300-$400, and MS doesn't price cut the Kinect bundle too aggressively, then it's possible that WiiU could launch at a price that's close to or even at parity with the most expensive 360 SKU. That would certainly make things interesting this fall.
HilariousThird parties come out with children's games and shit rhythm games on Wii because that is the userbase that Nintendo has presented to them.
This is not some mystery. Third parties made games that were like the games that sold well on Wii. They gave up making the sort of games that flopped on Wii.
The price drops came too late.
I never bought a PS3 or X360 because they cost way too much.
And then 3 years later they STILL cost too much.
And then 6 years later they STILL cost too much.
Should have been $99 by year 3, aka, like last gen.
Now, they can drop to $99 and frankly, I wont give a shit. The ship sailed, its old news. Yawn, etc.
Poor sales? Good, this gen is tired. Nintendo may have a huge advantage by launching this year.
The price drops came too late.
I never bought a PS3 or X360 because they cost way too much.
And then 3 years later they STILL cost too much.
And then 6 years later they STILL cost too much.
Should have been $99 by year 3, aka, like last gen.
Now, they can drop to $99 and frankly, I wont give a shit. The ship sailed, its old news. Yawn, etc.
Considering the fact that developing for the Wii requires a whole paradigm shift in development, which one do you think most developers will produce games for?
Not to mention the fact that the "HD Market" has consistently shown to buy traditional games a lot more than the Wii market.
The price drops came too late.
I never bought a PS3 or X360 because they cost way too much.
And then 3 years later they STILL cost too much.
And then 6 years later they STILL cost too much.
Should have been $99 by year 3, aka, like last gen.
Now, they can drop to $99 and frankly, I wont give a shit. The ship sailed, its old news. Yawn, etc.
It's the 3rd parties' fault for competing with Nintendo's games directly. If they had attracted a greater variety of gamers to the Wii by giving it quality support early, everyone involved is probably better off.This is not some mystery. Third parties made games that were like the games that sold well on Wii. They gave up making the sort of games that flopped on Wii.
Just Dance 3 is #2 on the charts with Wii as its #1 console
NBA 2k12 is #4 on the charts with Wii behind PSP in volume
Zumba is only on Wii and is on the charts
Skylander leads on Wii on the charts
Madden is on Wii and on the charts, with Wii in third place in volume
Third parties come out with children's games and shit rhythm games on Wii because that is the userbase that Nintendo has presented to them.
This is not some mystery. Third parties made games that were like the games that sold well on Wii. They gave up making the sort of games that flopped on Wii.
It is pretty obvious that Nintendo and MS milked their prices longer than usual due to struggles from their competitors at different points in the generation. If the Wii was selling gangbusters or the Wii was out right now, MS would have dropped by now.You live in fantasy land.
Lol wut?Why does everyone keep repeating this as if it's a matter of fact? The collapse of third party support was based on the failure of numerous hardcore third party games in the beginning years of the console.
There is a reason why we are on Just Dance 3 but there is no more de Blob or Elebits or Red Steel.
Nintendo made its own bed with the Wii. Between souring relationships with third parties and scaling back their own first party development for the console.
There is one thing that I really don't get about this...
Why did 3rd parties choose to go with the Wii ____ route instead of going the Mario or Zelda route?
It's the 3rd parties' fault for competing with Nintendo's games directly. If they had attracted a greater variety of gamers to the Wii by giving it quality support early, everyone involved is probably better off.
I think this data just really reinforces my sense that in large part Nintendo basically saved the gaming industry. Can you imagine if the Wii had tanked? I know people like to dismiss it for it's "casual" games (even though the meaning of that sometimes gets blurry) but imagine if either the PS3 or the 360's sales was the generational leader.
The industry saw some contraction especially early on I remember from a developer perspective because of the increased cost of HD development, but the industry would be in so much worse shape without the Wii. i said this in another thread but even though I know the 360 in particular had a great December neither the PS3 or 360 have shown themselves capable of growing or expanding the industry significantly, if Nintendo had followed their lead I think we'd be in much more dire times from an economic perspective.
SeriouslyI think this data just really reinforces my sense that in large part Nintendo basically saved the gaming industry. Can you imagine if the Wii had tanked? I know people like to dismiss it for it's "casual" games (even though the meaning of that sometimes gets blurry) but imagine if either the PS3 or the 360's sales was the generational leader.
The industry saw some contraction especially early on I remember from a developer perspective because of the increased cost of HD development, but the industry would be in so much worse shape without the Wii. i said this in another thread but even though I know the 360 in particular had a great December neither the PS3 or 360 have shown themselves capable of growing or expanding the industry significantly, if Nintendo had followed their lead I think we'd be in much more dire times from an economic perspective.
Are you unemployed or something? $200-250 is not a lot of money.
Why is there a Just Dance 3 but no Red Steel 3? Which one "competes" with Nintendo more directly? Or does it align with Nintendo's core userbase, rather than compete?
Games like Red Steel and that Sega shooter everyone tried to hype are the ones that are swimming upstream. Plenty of third parties gave the Wii games and made lots of money. The games just happened to be casual shit, like many of Nintendo's own top sellers. Serious games like Red Steel waned pretty quickly.
The price drops came too late.
I never bought a PS3 or X360 because they cost way too much.
And then 3 years later they STILL cost too much.
And then 6 years later they STILL cost too much.
Should have been $99 by year 3, aka, like last gen.
Now, they can drop to $99 and frankly, I wont give a shit. The ship sailed, its old news. Yawn, etc.
It is if you're someone who has a family to take care of.
Or at the very least, it might seem like a waste of money.
Just Dance 2 -> >5 million sold on Wii, NPD.
Red Steel 2 -> <250k sold on Wii, NPD (although I don't have an updated number, I don't think they'd had a sudden uptick in sales more than a year after release)
I wonder why they made a Just Dance 3. I wonder why they didn't make a Red Steel 3.
Why is there a Just Dance 3 but no Red Steel 3? Which one "competes" with Nintendo more directly? Or does it align with Nintendo's core userbase, rather than compete?
Just Dance 2 -> >5 million sold on Wii, NPD.
Red Steel 2 -> <250k sold on Wii, NPD (although I don't have an updated number, I don't think they'd had a sudden uptick in sales more than a year after release)
I wonder why they made a Just Dance 3. I wonder why they didn't make a Red Steel 3.
red steel 1 though despite being shit was a million seller, if it hadnt taken 3/4 years for a sequel it might have stood a chance
Just Dance 2 -> >5 million sold on Wii, NPD.
Red Steel 2 -> <250k sold on Wii, NPD (although I don't have an updated number, I don't think they'd had a sudden uptick in sales more than a year after release)
I wonder why they made a Just Dance 3. I wonder why they didn't make a Red Steel 3.
red steel 1 though despite being shit was a million seller, if it hadnt taken 3/4 years for a sequel it might have stood a chance
One group is affecting sales more significantly than the other. (It's not the early adopters)
.
I don't understand these types of posts. You know nothing about his or her life or how he or she perceives the worth of these consoles.He could have had a PS3 or 360 a while ago if he saved $20 each paycheck. Seriously, $250 is not a high price at all for a PS3 slim 160GB.
Seriously
The writing was on the wall around the time Wii sales started coming down and 360 sales had not had their crazy Kinect fueled rise. Microsoft was merely throwing a few buckets of Kinect sand on a roaring fire fueled by red ink and it is starting to show again.
I think this data just really reinforces my sense that in large part Nintendo basically saved the gaming industry. Can you imagine if the Wii had tanked? I know people like to dismiss it for it's "casual" games (even though the meaning of that sometimes gets blurry) but imagine if either the PS3 or the 360's sales was the generational leader.
The industry saw some contraction especially early on I remember from a developer perspective because of the increased cost of HD development, but the industry would be in so much worse shape without the Wii. i said this in another thread but even though I know the 360 in particular had a great December neither the PS3 or 360 have shown themselves capable of growing or expanding the industry significantly, if Nintendo had followed their lead I think we'd be in much more dire times from an economic perspective.
Because it's lower cost and isn't a second sequel to a poorly received launch game? Because a Just Dance 3 exists in a software environment that third-parties cultivated for party games as opposed to single-player experiences? There's a million reasons, most of them starting with decisions third-parties made at launch.
Why is there a Just Dance 3 but no Red Steel 3? Which one "competes" with Nintendo more directly? Or does it align with Nintendo's core userbase, rather than compete?
Games like Red Steel and that Sega shooter everyone tried to hype are the ones that are swimming upstream. Plenty of third parties gave the Wii games and made lots of money. The games just happened to be casual shit, like many of Nintendo's own top sellers. Serious games like Red Steel waned pretty quickly.
You know what this industry needs? A new handheld!
Seriously though I wonder if a generation in decline will actually help the Vita just because people want something new. I know that's a big part of the draw to me...
The price drops came too late.
I never bought a PS3 or X360 because they cost way too much.
And then 3 years later they STILL cost too much.
And then 6 years later they STILL cost too much.
Should have been $99 by year 3, aka, like last gen.
Now, they can drop to $99 and frankly, I wont give a shit. The ship sailed, its old news. Yawn, etc.