Numbers and graphs are posted in diverse threads. So, there is no reason not to do the same with puns I guess.I mean can you blame me?
But yea I might be a tad bit tipsy haha
Numbers and graphs are posted in diverse threads. So, there is no reason not to do the same with puns I guess.
I don't like shipment numbers, there is always the risc that it's a move to stuff channels and look good. so I won't felicitate on that.So apparently 8.4 million is the biggest unit shipment Sony has ever had beating out PS2's 8 million shipped in 2002.
I don't like shipment numbers, there is always the risc that it's a move to stuff channels and look good. so I won't felicitate on that.
But on the other hand 8.4 million is just crazy.
Considering how much less this holiday season PS4 sold in US and in Japan compared to PS2 during 2002 holiday season PS4 is killing it in rest of the world. Of course going by sold trough numbers it seems like they overshipped a bit but nevertheless. It's not that rare during holiday seasons either especially for market leader.So apparently 8.4 million is the biggest unit shipment Sony has ever had beating out PS2's 8 million shipped in 2002.
Source
Considering how much less this holiday season PS4 sold in US and in Japan compared to PS2 during 2002 holiday season PS4 is killing it in rest of the world. Of course going by sold trough numbers it seems like they overshipped a bit but nevertheless. It's not that rare during holiday seasons either especially for market leader.
Considering how much less this holiday season PS4 sold in US and in Japan compared to PS2 during 2002 holiday season PS4 is killing it in rest of the world. Of course going by sold trough numbers it seems like they overshipped a bit but nevertheless. It's not that rare during holiday seasons either especially for market leader.
PS2 number refers to shipments from factory, so isn't the same type of number as this 8.4m for PS4.
It's possible that PS2 sales at that quarter in 2002 was bigger if Sony had stock in warehouses and sold to retailers in this period.
The problem was not about PS4 overshipped, but with PS2 undershipped that quarter.
Sony has sold trough ~8.5 million of PS2, but they shipped only ~8 million.
Btw, we Know PS4 BF+December was ~5.7 million. Should be >7 million Nov+Dec, which is still a massive success.
PS2 number refers to shipments from factory, so isn't the same type of number as this 8.4m for PS4.
It's possible that PS2 sales at that quarter in 2002 was bigger if Sony had stock in warehouses and sold to retailers in this period.
The problem was not about PS4 overshipped, but with PS2 undershipped that quarter.
Sony has sold trough ~8.5 million of PS2, but they shipped only ~8 million.
Btw, we Know PS4 BF+December was ~5.7 million. Should be >7 million Nov+Dec, which is still a massive success.
Shipments from factory means units shipped from the factory. So any units shipped from a factory to a retailer WW would be counted. It's "sold in" before we called it "sold in."
Isn't the same thing. All units that left the factory was counted, even those there weren't sold to any retailer in the quarter.
Now just units that are in fact sold are reported. Sony changed his method of recording sales in 2007.
During the 4th quarter of calendar year 2002 the cumulative Production Shipments of PlayStation 2 Hardware reached 49.59 million units with a total of 8.03 million sold in for the entire quarter.
This consisted of 1.5 million Production Shipments to Japan distributors, 3.3 million Production Shipments to North American distributors and 3.3 million Production Shipments to European and PAL distributors.
The total amount sold through to end users exceeded 8.5 million worldwide across November and December, which included shipments made and recognised prior to the quarter.
So your saying that less of the manufactured units are counted now as opposed to the 100% of manufactured units when PS2 figures were being reported? I think I must've misread your first post. It seemed like you were saying the opposite.
Another day, another MAU.
A good example for illustrate is what happened with PS3 (Sony changed the report method starting april 2007).
At the end of march 2007 PS3 shipment was at 5.5 million, later Sony provided updated numbers with the new method and PS3 number was down to 3.5m.
So 2 million units left the factory but was in transit or in warehouses for be shipped later.
Had no idea the reporting changes lead to that much of difference. That's a huge difference.
So they sold through more than they shipped? That would mean that there was significant amounts of stock on shelves waiting to be sold as well.
The only Mattrick that really matters /s
Until 2006 Sony reported shipment production... that means everything Sony produced in their warehouses was counted.So you're saying that less of the manufactured units are counted now as opposed to the 100% of manufactured units when PS2 figures were being reported? I think I must've misread your first post. It seemed like you were saying the opposite.
AMD, EA... every source is showing that 18 million figure for Xbox One not just makes sense but also can be a little conservative.
The console is doing Ok, is not a huge success like PS4, but is not a failure either.
Sony Q3 results are in
8.4 million units sold in for Q3
37.7 million units sold in by end of 2015 WW
So given the sell through figure of 35.9 million we can say that ~ 1.8 million units were on shelves at end of year. That a lot given the Sony's previous tightly managed shipped:sold ratio.
You seem upset. I know what you need! A song! Sing it with me now
MAU land is your land
MAU land is my land
From the Windows desktop
To the Surface store stand.
This land was ads for MAU and Me
There there don't you feel better now?
Agreed only thing with MS is that their gaming strategy has been predicated on being the leader in major markets. Now that they aren't they will lose more and more ground as 3rd party exclusives go away. TR was a disaster and I would be surprised if anyone else follows suit. Titanfall 2 last gen would be Xbox exclusive, this gen it will come to PS as well.
So it will be interesting to see what MS 1st party comes up with and what partners they can find with independent studios for more games to counter that.
Agreed only thing with MS is that their gaming strategy has been predicated on being the leader in major markets. Now that they aren't they will lose more and more ground as 3rd party exclusives go away. TR was a disaster and I would be surprised if anyone else follows suit. Titanfall 2 last gen would be Xbox exclusive, this gen it will come to PS as well.
So it will be interesting to see what MS 1st party comes up with and what partners they can find with independent studios for more games to counter that.
It helps MAuSo many Xbox 1st party also coming to Win10 doesn't help either.
So many Xbox 1st party also coming to Win10 doesn't help either.
Of course. But it doesn't help "only on XboxOne".It helps MAu
We are talking console sales here. When customers see that nearly all xbox 1st party games also come to Win10 it might lower the desire to bux a box.i'd love to see how this is hurting anyone.
I feel that if anyone had that data, it might just be MS, who seems perfectly okay with how things are
Very true, though I'm not sure how much they are focusing on that anymore.Of course. But it doesn't help "only on XboxOne".
That's the million dollar question that decides about the future of Xbox as a console.Very true, though I'm not sure how much they are focusing on that anymore.
Also looks like other guy gave up oh well.
The next XBox will almost certainly be something similar to an AppleTV. Nadella said he kept XBox around because gaming is important to mobile, and mobile is important. Their next TV device will be something designed for streaming and leveraging whatever mobile ecosystem they're cooking up, and the Windows ecosystem in general.That's the million dollar question that decides about the future of Xbox as a console.
Slightly dramatised maybe.
Of course. But it doesn't help "only on XboxOne".
I would not bet against that.snip
Not my fault that you refused to discuss. Oh well, I'm still waiting to hear your counterarguments. And if you're wondering what fallacy you made this time....
OT: Impressive shipment numbers, though that's a huge gap between those and sold-through numbers.
We are talking console sales here. When customers see that nearly all xbox 1st party games also come to Win10 it might lower the desire to bux a box.
But this is just my personal opinion.
Example: If Halo comes to PC it might make a lot of money, but for the Spencer Device Group this would be counter-productive.
Notice how no one is backing you up but they backed me up as soon as you had a post directed at me? There's a reason for that, you won't figure that out of course. but get that last word in, being immature as you are, you have to have it.
I'm loving these. Are all the fallacies collected on some website or are you making these as needed?
The $99 console argument is still going?
Hint: Everyone wants you to buy the new system, not the old one. The real free money isn't $99 and free online, it's $50 paid online for 5-6 years with no hardware costs and you can sell other services for.
I dunno if it can really even be defined as an argument. It's like one dude trying to argue for it and getting mad when all of his logical fallacies get pointed out...
I do really enjoy how passionate he is though. That only if MS and Sony saw the brilliance of this amazing idea their pocketbooks would be overflowing.
Notice how no one is backing you up but they backed me up as soon as you had a post directed at me? There's a reason for that, you won't figure that out of course.
Awww it's cute that you think that's what happened here. You're adorable.