finalflame
Banned
How do we reckon SLi support will be in DX12/Vulkan?
I really wanna upgrade to two of these babies and X99.
I really wanna upgrade to two of these babies and X99.
Always is a bit of an overstatement, 970 launched with aftermarket coolers available day 1.
It's an early adopter tax, nothing more nothing less.
Yup, right now it seems like that's your only choice from both Nvidia and 3rd parties for a month or so.
Im still not even sure if the non FE cards will even come close to the 599 MSRP
If you ask me, dropping 3- and 4-way SLI support is actually a surprisingly consumer-friendly move.
In 99% of real-world cases, it has been a terrible idea for a long time now, if not always. Still, it allowed NV to sell one or 2 additional GPUs to insane people, and they are giving that up.
I wonder when we will get theFastSynctriple buffering driver. I'd like to play around with that.
I wonder when we will get theFastSynctriple buffering driver. I'd like to play around with that.
So the 1080GTX msrp is $599 and the Founders edition is $699. $100 more for the premium materials/cooling solution.
The 1070GTX msrp is $380 and the Founders edition is $450. $70 more for premium materials/cooling solution...
So the 1080GTX msrp is $599 and the Founders edition is $699. $100 more for the premium materials/cooling solution.
The 1070GTX msrp is $380 and the Founders edition is $450. $70 more for premium materials/cooling solution...
It's not for the "premium materials/cooling solution".
How do we reckon SLi support will be in DX12/Vulkan?
I really wanna upgrade to two of these babies and X99.
So the 1080GTX msrp is $599 and the Founders edition is $699. $100 more for the premium materials/cooling solution.
The 1070GTX msrp is $380 and the Founders edition is $450. $70 more for premium materials/cooling solution...
"Premium Cooling" as it chokes itself back to 1600~ for half of the gaming session.
Than the ones they would've used if they didn't have to justify the extra $100
Kind of my point. They should make the msrp on the 1070 $350 to at least make it seem legit.
I mean, did they use to market their cards as having subpar materials for past launches? I just don't know how we could possibly know the quality of materials they would have used otherwise.
How have you got triple buffering in your games? It's almost impossible to get real triple buffering in any modern game in fullscreen mode. (It's very easy to get something many people call "triple buffering", but which is in fact a 3 buffer queue)From a pure game perspective, what would we get out of this FastSynch tech? I mean I already got tripple buffering in my games.
This is all an experiment to see how much they can gouge of people conditioned by pretty much everyone for the last year to expect Pascal to be the savior of mankind.
If AMD starts kicking their asses again, they will just lower the price on the cards to a slightly less absurd level.
Given that NVIDIA stopped manufacturing Maxwell chips already, you also can't expect 9xx cards to drop in price, so either way you're fucked.
"Premium Cooling" as it chokes itself back to 1600~ for half of the gaming session.
I wonder when we will get theFastSynctriple buffering driver. I'd like to play around with that.
Is Kepler supported or is it Maxwell/Pascal only?
Results for the hack job GTX 1080 Hybrid by GamerNexus are in if somebody cares: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-3fi1ovAP0
Looks promising to say the least! dat premium 100$ cooling in full force
![]()
Results for the hack job GTX 1080 Hybrid by GamerNexus are in if somebody cares: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-3fi1ovAP0
Looks promising to say the least! dat premium 100$ cooling in full force
![]()
Results for the hack job GTX 1080 Hybrid by GamerNexus are in if somebody cares: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-3fi1ovAP0
Looks promising to say the least! dat premium 100$ cooling in full force
![]()
From a pure game perspective, what would we get out of this FastSynch tech? I mean I already got tripple buffering in my games.
It's not for the "premium materials/cooling solution".
The presenter even accidentally called it reference and tried to pass it off as a joke.
Thanks for the video. Nice explanation. But it seems like FastSync is Pascal only. Usually Nvidia introduces new features to older architectures as well but that doesn't seem to be the case here. But I'm mostly likely buying a GTX1070 anyway...
Results for the hack job GTX 1080 Hybrid by GamerNexus are in if somebody cares: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-3fi1ovAP0
Looks promising to say the least! dat premium 100$ cooling in full force
![]()
I wonder when we will get theFastSynctriple buffering driver. I'd like to play around with that.
Pending any groundbreaking AMD announcements, I think I've come around to picking up two GTX 1070s.
If I'm running a 4790k with 32GB DDR3, 3 hard drives and 5 systems fans, will a 750watt Corsair PSU cut it?
Might be time to upgrade from a GTX 660.
Would the 1070 or 1080 be good with my Core i7-4770k? Could I finally start taking games like Rise of the Tomb Raider off of minimum settings?
heh yeah that upgrade (either one) would blow your mind apartMight be time to upgrade from a GTX 660.
Would the 1070 or 1080 be good with my Core i7-4770k? Could I finally start taking games like Rise of the Tomb Raider off of minimum settings?
Might be time to upgrade from a GTX 660.
Would the 1070 or 1080 be good with my Core i7-4770k? Could I finally start taking games like Rise of the Tomb Raider off of minimum settings?
So if I'm reading all the reviews correctly, the Founders cooling is fine for the reference clock and boost. But if you want to overclock, or have a factory overclock then you need the custom jobs in June+.
Might be time to upgrade from a GTX 660.
Would the 1070 or 1080 be good with my Core i7-4770k? Could I finally start taking games like Rise of the Tomb Raider off of minimum settings?
So if I'm reading all the reviews correctly, the Founders cooling is fine for the reference clock and boost. But if you want to overclock, or have a factory overclock then you need the custom jobs in June+.
Not really, throttling at boost speeds is a fairly consistent phenomenen across all few reviews I've checked.So if I'm reading all the reviews correctly, the Founders cooling is fine for the reference clock and boost. But if you want to overclock, or have a factory overclock then you need the custom jobs in June+.
Initially I thought the GamersNexus review was choking the card easily, but then noticed that they had blocked all the case intake fans and run a rigorous game.
Of course then there's the matter of the extra $100.. but I haven't overclocked a video card in at least a decade. I think the last pair of factory overclocked cards I had.. one artifacted and took weeks to replace. Just not worth the hassles to me.. but damn that extra EA tax. Edit: I sometimes run SLI, then pass the cards to the kids' PC and my HTPC when I upgrade, so the reference cards are better suited for that progression.
Yes. Either card will smoke your 660 and will absolutely allow you to play games on high settings. If you're gaming at 1080p, the 1070 will be a fantastic fit.
I don't think the reference cooler has ever been able to handle the boost more than a few minutes
Just long enough to give a good benchmark score
I have it hooked up to my 50 inch TV, so 1080p is the limit right now. At that resolution, would there be any reason for a 1080? Any benefit in emulators like Dolphin?
Downsampling, VR, more likely to play the latest games at 1080p max settings. Don't know why people keep saying the 1080 is overkill for 1080p, the graphics in AAA games isn't going to just stay the same forever.
I have it hooked up to my 50 inch TV, so 1080p is the limit right now. At that resolution, would there be any reason for a 1080? Any benefit in emulators like Dolphin?