Outside Russia the most vigorous effort to discredit the Magnitsky story has taken place in a New York court, where a company owned by a 39-year-old Russian, Denis Katsyv, is facing civil forfeiture charges for purchasing real estate with $14m allegedly laundered from the Magnitsky fraud. Mr Katsyv, whose father is vice-president of the state-owned Russian Railways, denies the allegations, which do not include criminal charges. The prosecutions case is largely based on documentation of wire transfers provided by Mr Browder.
In court filings, lawyers for Mr Katsyvs company, Prevezon Holdings, identify what they say are holes in Hermitages account of the fraud. Aping Mr Browders campaign, the Katsyv camp has hired lobbyists and public relations consultants to urge media to report on its claims. One adviser, Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian defence lawyer and friend of the Katsyv family as well as a vocal Putin supporter claims Mr Browders story is a sham.
Im the real investigative lawyer that he is trying to build Magnitsky into, she told the Financial Times. Its easy to check. You just have to see if the dates, events, and consequences match up, and always ask yourself: Who benefits from these things happening?
In its filings, Prevezon suggests Mr Browder contrived and skilfully sold his story to thwart his arrest in connection with the tax fraud case for which he was convicted in absentia in 2013, in proceedings that also saw Magnitsky convicted posthumously. The company adds that it is plausible Browder stole the money from the Russian treasury or, at least, knew about the fraud before it occurred.
The US justice department responded in a counter filing that Prevezons accusations that Hermitage was the perpetrator, rather than the victim, of the fraud are false and are based on an incredibly selective and inaccurate presentation of the evidence.
Ms Veselnitskaya provides a common link to other parts of the anti-Browder campaign. She helped organise the Brussels screening of Mr Nekrasovs film. Her claims also dovetail in part with those of the film-maker, whose documentary uses some material from Prevezons defence.