LOLronito said:Hey how's the protest going? Cure corporatist greed yet?
![]()
Shock and awe!
Sharpie sign, guy fawkes mask, keffiya. What i expected.ronito said:Hey how's the protest going? Cure corporatist greed yet?
![]()
Shock and awe!
lawblob said:Look at all that squatting! Ready the fire hoses!
Dude Abides said:It was considerate of them to do it on a Saturday so they don't disrupt people's work schedules.
Utako said:That photo's taken about a 10-minute walk away from Wall St, btw. Unless they're renaming this to "Occupy Battery Park" there are probably more crowds located further uptown.
Dude, give it up. Your not making any valid points, just crapping on these people.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:Sure....more like it makes it easier to fortify positions to maximize disruption on Monday.
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:Their aim is to "squat" and deny access to people in the area to the jobs.
pompidu said:Dude, give it up. Your not making any valid points, just crapping on these people.
Homeless people actually moved when they are asked too...and generally smell better.SolKane said:That's still not squatting, unless you also think homeless people or the students at K-Ville are squatters.
Federal Hall isn't recognizable?Tamanon said:Doubtful, they'd want to get their message around the Bull, the Street itself isn't quite as recognizable.
They are not squatting and most businesses are closed today. Still waiting for your valid points. Il wait.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:Actually I just made a very valid point, so nice try.
Homeless people actually moved when they are asked too...and generally smell better.
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:Sure....more like it makes it easier to fortify positions to maximize disruption on Monday.
They waiting for Monday (since they want to "Occupy Wall Street") They know that otherwise NY Commuters will push and step over their asses if they try to setup on Monday.pompidu said:They are not squatting and most businesses are closed today. Still waiting for your valid points. Il wait.
I'm saying that's their thinking, not that they'll pull it off or have any real numbers.Dude Abides said:LoL. I hope you're kidding... This protest is a joke. Nobody's going to be fortifying anything.
There peacefully protesting. 100% legal. If it becomes disruptive they will be asked to move. Absolutely nothing wrong here. Still don't see why you have a problem.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:They waiting for Monday (since they want to "Occupy Wall Street") They know that otherwise NY Commuters will push and step over their asses if they try to setup on Monday.
If they state there goal is to "Occupy Wall Street" it suggests strongly encouraging illegal activities. It didn't say "Protest"pompidu said:There peacefully protesting. 100% legal. If it becomes disruptive they will be asked to move. Absolutely nothing wrong here. Still don't see why you have a problem.
Serious stuff. People against protesting just boggles my mind.Eric Walton said:haha u guys are hilarious
INTERNET FORUM
Because we think they're a bunch of fucking goofs who could cause damage and commit acts of violence...and lack any cohesive point besides a general wall st bad.pompidu said:Serious stuff. People against protesting just boggles my mind.
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:If they state there goal is to "Occupy Wall Street" it suggests strongly encouraging illegal activities. It didn't say "Protest"
I see no illegal activities happening or read anything illegal about what's happening during this protest. You are wrong. Show me proof and a source that shows illegal activity happening. If not were done here.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:If they state there goal is to "Occupy Wall Street" it suggests strongly encouraging illegal activities. It didn't say "Protest"
pompidu said:I see no illegal activities happening or read anything illegal about what's happening during this protest. You are wrong. Show me proof and a source that shows illegal activity happening. If not were done here.
Guys they couldn't manage to get up before noon today. lolbill gonorrhea said:more police than protesters? Sad.. pathetic actually
I'm not against protesting, I just don't support ignorance fueled, Tea Party-like protests. Like I said, maybe this one is different but I doubt it since I've seen protests on Wall Street before when I used to live there (for undergrad, I'm not an evil banker. As previously mentioned most bankers do not live anywhere close to Wall St.).pompidu said:Serious stuff. People against protesting just boggles my mind.
pompidu said:Dude, give it up. Your not making any valid points, just crapping on these people.
Yep zero evidence, just ignorant opnions on what you think will happen on Monday. Done arguing with someone who spits out opnions as truth. Peace out.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:I have provided evidence, you just choice to ignore it. So you are right we are done here.
Guys they couldn't manage to get up before noon today. lol
I agree you haven't supplied us with any evidence.pompidu said:Yep zero evidence,.
Well said. Agreeing or disagreeing with these people are fine. Doing research about the topic does help in being educated on why their protesting. People are screaming illegal shennigans about what could happen on Monday, they are some fairy tale soothsayersSuperBonk said:I'm not against protesting, I just don't support ignorance fueled, Tea Party-like protests. Like I said, maybe this one is different but I doubt it since I've seen protests on Wall Street before when I used to live there (for undergrad, I'm not an evil banker. As previously mentioned most bankers do not live anywhere close to Wall St.).
I agree that the financial policies of this country are in need of a major tweaking. However, despite still living in Manhattan, I will not attend this protest because I realize I do not have a strong enough background in the subject to argue for what I think should be done. And I have work to do.
I don't have to. I'm not the one shouting illegal activities. You are.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:I agree you haven't supplied us with any evidence.
Coming from a person whose supplied no evidence, that's kind of rich.pompidu said:Well said. Agreeing or disagreeing with these people are fine. Doing research about the topic does help in being educated on why their protesting. People are screaming illegal shennigans about what could happen on Monday, they are some fairy tale soothsayers
Nice, I'm not saying disprove a negative, I'm saying evidence to support your viewpoint that the squatters aren't intending to promote illegal activities.pompidu said:I don't have to. I'm not the one shouting illegal activities. You are.
This. The thing is peaceful protest is doomed to failure. So is violent protest. Burning cars or whatever is a minor inconvenience to the mega-rich.Chichikov said:About time.
I don't get the people rooting for it to fail, unless they work for Wall Street.
There's 8 people there. I see no guns, gas, knives or anything that would promote violent illegal activities. I can't see the future and nor can you. Your assuming shit is gonna get real there. You can't. You are making shit up about what you think might happen. And that is why you are wrong. Unless you want to restate your position with a more proper and intellectual view than ill listen otherwise I'm going to continue to browse gaf.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:Coming from a person whose supplied no evidence, that's kind of rich.
Nice, I'm not saying disprove a negative, I'm saying evidence to support your viewpoint that the squatters aren't intending to promote illegal activities.
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:They waiting for Monday (since they want to "Occupy Wall Street") They know that otherwise NY Commuters will push and step over their asses if they try to setup on Monday.
I'm saying that's their thinking, not that they'll pull it off or have any real numbers.
pompidu said:There's 8 people there. I see no guns, gas, knives or anything that would promote violent illegal activities. I can't see the future and nor can you. Your assuming shit is gonna get real there. You can't. You are making shit up about what you think might happen. And that is why you are wrong. Unless you want to restate your position with a more proper and intellectual view than ill listen otherwise I'm going to continue to browse gaf.
Dude Abides said:I doubt their thinking is all that focused, united, or militant. You seem to be taking hyperbolic sloganeering at face value to a degree that is rather humorous.
pompidu said:There's 8 people there. I see no guns, gas, knives or anything that would promote violent illegal activities. I can't see the future and nor can you. Your assuming shit is gonna get real there. You can't. You are making shit up about what you think might happen. And that is why you are wrong. Unless you want to restate your position with a more proper and intellectual view than ill listen otherwise I'm going to continue to browse gaf.
I agree, meant to put an "or" in there. On my phone so typing is a pain. Just gets me riled up when people make stuff about what's legal and what's not. And then pretend to see the future. Eerks me.Morn said:You don't have to be violent to be illegal.
brucewaynegretzky said:Serious question. If you went up to any random person in that crowd would they have specific example of a statute, regulation, or practice that needs to change, and could could they say what it should be changed to?
I wouldn't be surprised if they did, although whether their stance is well thought out or even accurate at all is anyone's guess.brucewaynegretzky said:Serious question. If you went up to any random person in that crowd would they have specific example of a statute, regulation, or practice that needs to change, and could could they say what it should be changed to?