Keyser Soze said:WWE is unfixable (from our point of view) at this point. We should just be happy with:
1 five-star match a year
1 good match per PPV (with luck)
15 minutes of decent RAW per episode, at best
At least one great episode of Raw, a year
2 decent ideas, per year
2 new stars we will probably like, each year
A a few decent Smackdowns runs every few months before they "fix it"
Keyser Soze said:WWE is unfixable (from our point of view) at this point. We should just be happy with:
1 five-star match a year
1 good match per PPV (with luck)
15 minutes of decent RAW per episode, at best
At least one great episode of Raw, a year
2 decent ideas, per year
2 new stars we will probably like, each year
A a few decent Smackdowns runs every few months before they "fix it"
Keyser Soze said:WWE is unfixable (from our point of view) at this point. We should just be happy with:
1 five-star match a year
1 good match per PPV (with luck)
15 minutes of decent RAW per episode, at best
At least one great episode of Raw, a year
2 decent ideas, per year
2 new stars we will probably like, each year
A a few decent Smackdowns runs every few months before they "fix it"
Next time.bwahhhhh said:get a big bodyguard to beat the hell out of your roommate, have him hold your roommate up, pull down your pants, then tell your roommate he's about to join the KISS MY ASS CLUB
spindashing said:even if the wrestling fans got what they wanted, they'd find some way to complain about the material.
"if you don't like it, why you still watching, fam?"
excuse me while I go knee an up-and-coming star in the face repeatedly.
Batista said:"I will not be doing MMA/Strikeforce any time soon. So you can see me in the future of the WWE."
Net_Wrecker said:Fans of anything will ALWAYS want "more this" and "better that" but there is a difference between wanting more from a good product but feeling satisfied, and wanting more from an obviously bad product in which the WWE is the latter. They have great talent on the roster capable of putting on excellent shows, but the booking is just ruining everything this year aside from the initial Nexus invasion, and the HBK/Undertaker feud (which was probably largely on HBK/Undertaker anyway)
NoDQ.com said:Credit: F4WOnline.com
- Scott Hall is out of rehab and is hoping to get back with TNA. Hall is also looking at opening a wrestling school in Florida.
- TNA held drug testing a few weeks back and the wrestlers who failed tests were simply told they failed and there was no action taken or suspensions given over at least some, if not all of the failures.
- Look for many changes in TNA soon as far as face turns, heel turns and new groups forming. At one point, the plan was for Kurt Angle to be World Champion with Eric Bischoff & Hulk Hogan as the top heels and Sting as a top face, coming out of Bound For Glory. No word yet if that is still the plan but we will know after this weekend.
- Its also expected that either Rob Van Dam or Jeff Hardy will turn heel. Its said that Hogan wants a top heel group thats considered cool like the NWO was.
Its said that Hogan wants a top heel group thats considered cool like the NWO was.
face tista vs heel cena as the leader of nexusBootaaay said:
Host Samurai said:I really don't think WWE will be "fixed". I mean I am sure the product can get better but I don't think wrestling will ever reach the heights of what it was in the 80's and Attitude Era.
1) The business has been way too much exposed
2) WWE is too scripted and robotic these days (yes I know they can change the style of matches and stories but that doesnt seem to be happening any time soon)
3) The rise of MMA has pretty much made wrestling a less "edgy" product. A lot of old wrestling fans have just moved on once their favorite wrestler has either retired or left the industry and just don't care for the new WWE or wrestling generation.
If wrestling is ever going to get attention in the media again than the WWE product or some other wrestling promotion should get a deal with HBO or something and go all out with realistic stories that are believable while keep great wrestling talent around. WWE is too concerned with their wrestlers looking like bodybuilders these days. I don't think that should be necessary.
What.Linkified said:Also MMA isn't edgy once you get over the fact its real and TKOs can come at any time.
BoboBrazil said:"- Look for many changes in TNA soon as far as face turns, heel turns and new groups forming. At one point, the plan was for Kurt Angle to be World Champion with Eric Bischoff & Hulk Hogan as the top heels and Sting as a top face, coming out of Bound For Glory. No word yet if that is still the plan but we will know after this weekend.
- Its also expected that either Rob Van Dam or Jeff Hardy will turn heel. Its said that Hogan wants a top heel group thats considered cool like the NWO was."
These two things don't go together. Also the Hogan thing is likely scrapped now due to the problems he is having with his back. He is back in the hospital today.
The Hogan situation is interesting because his showing himself looking so hurt with the recent back hospitalizations would seem to work against a heel turn. There are those in the company noting just how strongly they go on television with his hospitalization that there is more here than meets the eye, not that he doesnt have a bad back, but perhaps some of this is an angle. Now why you would want to portray Hogan as being so hurt for his return when the goal is for him to be a heel, well, that does seem to make no sense. Hogan is still on the schedule to wrestle on 10/10 in the Hogan & Jeff Jarrett & Samoa Joe vs. Kevin Nash & Sting & Pope match. If theres a long-planned out angle here, Hogan may have to be on the apron even if his back isnt ready, and again there are people skeptical of what is and isnt real on that injury. I mean, hes got a bad back, has had it for years, but is all the stuff hes making sure gets out something that will end up being part of a storyline?
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:What.
What.Linkified said:The poster I quoted said MMA was edgy which isn't really the case other than its a real sport and people can get knocked out at any time in a match.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:What.
I love actual unbelievable characters like those two. Good luck with getting some of those in this day and age :^(ryutaro's mama said:
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:What.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTLCZkQCbnYLiu Kang Baking A Pie said:What.
Forkball said:
abstract alien said:Damn Heyman, quite a bit of power you want right there...
He has nothing to lose. Why not ask for everything he would want to get back into this shit?abstract alien said:Damn Heyman, quite a bit of power you want right there...
Linkified said:WWE is still poular worldwide though. If you want really need to make it more believable to get some of the UFC audience back to watching wrestling, they could easily concentrate on having one brand, less PPV's, the winning to losing ratio of their talent aka don't book squash matches, plus no suprise booking.
Also MMA isn't edgy once you get over the fact its real and TKOs can come at any time.
He wants to be able to have complete creative freedom. Pretty understandable after having to work with Vince.abstract alien said:Damn Heyman, quite a bit of power you want right there...
Well, I guess I was thinking that he could get in and really show them how much is was needed. I don't blame him for laying out what he wants in a most desirable situation, but the second I read about him "having the ability to fire people", it just didn't seem like something that would fly by well. Not to say he couldn't do a better job than what is happening right now, I think he most definitely would. It just feels like a decision you have to let them make on their own once they see how valuable of an asset you really are to them.Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:He has nothing to lose. Why not ask for everything he would want to get back into this shit?
Forkball said:
And yet you still watchKeyser Soze said:WWE is unfixable (from our point of view) at this point. We should just be happy with:
1 five-star match a year
1 good match per PPV (with luck)
15 minutes of decent RAW per episode, at best
At least one great episode of Raw, a year
2 decent ideas, per year
2 new stars we will probably like, each year
A a few decent Smackdowns runs every few months before they "fix it"
Host Samurai said:I never said that it was never popular or anything. I was stating that I don't think it will ever be "the hot thing" anymore like it was in the late 90's unless there is a major overhaul to the brand and even that is stretching it a bit.
And MMA is a lot more "edgy" and "mature" than having a announcer scream "puppies" and having a midget run around with dirt on his face trying to be funny. Just sayin.
And yet you still reply.avatar299 said:And yet you still watch
JdFoX187 said:And yet you still reply.
Professional wrestling isn't going anywhere. In the early 90s, it fell into a similar rut and people were probably saying then how it was never going to recover and it would eventually fall by the wayside. Right now, it's in another rut. It's still popular as hell, if not moreso in the mainstream. Even in the glorious Attitude Era, you didn't have the mainstream exposure that wrestling has now. The Rock, Austin, DX, Mankind, etc. weren't making the daily rounds on late night talk shows or making movies like they do now. Foley wrote the occasional book and that was about it.
I would venture to say more people "follow" professional wrestling now than ever before. The indies are more popular than ever for quality wrestling. There is more actual wrestling on television than there was in the Attitude Era. The only difference is people just aren't buying the PPVs that they used to, and ratings are slightly down. But you also have to consider there are a hell of a more PPVs than there were back then, and we didn't have the Internet back then for easy access to lamps like we do now.
Dork Knight said:Whaaa? You crazy? Rock was on SNL multiple times. Austin, Foley, HHH, and Sable (I think?) were on TV Guide covers. Remember Ready to Rumble? Rock in Scorpion King? Wrestling was WAAAAY more in the mainstream back then. Hardly anyone (outside of little kids) know who John Cena is. But a LARGE amount of people knew who Stone Cold and The Rock were back in their heyday.
WWE currently is still very popular, yes, but no where near as mainstream as it was in the past.
avatar299 said:And yet you still watch
Christopher said:Right...those "people" know who Stone Cold is because they were the kids of those days. Just the same as in a couple of years everyone will know who John Cena is.
spindashing said:we have to stick together and bitch about US sports entertainment together, guys. don't stray away from the cause. let's all glorify the attitude era...
it was so...
...
avant-garde
Some of the new guys have been on SNL. TV Guide is more of an afterthought anymore, and covers on there aren't as big as they were then. Ready to Rumble was a WCW-funded movie that absolutely failed at the box office. At least WWE's movies have made money. Outside of this last one, which I don't even know the name, they've all been profitable. Besides, Mummy Returns was well after the Attitude Era, the same with Scorpion King.Dork Knight said:Whaaa? You crazy? Rock was on SNL multiple times. Austin, Foley, HHH, and Sable (I think?) were on TV Guide covers. Remember Ready to Rumble? Rock in Scorpion King? Wrestling was WAAAAY more in the mainstream back then. Hardly anyone (outside of little kids) know who John Cena is. But a LARGE amount of people knew who Stone Cold and The Rock were back in their heyday.
WWE currently is still very popular, yes, but no where near as mainstream as it was in the past.