BenjaminBirdie
Banned
nerbo said:It's still just Iowa. Can't take it too seriously.
"Pretty soon the Wii will stop getting supply constrained and interest will disappear. People crave HD gaming..."
nerbo said:It's still just Iowa. Can't take it too seriously.
Uh, then I agree with Triumph that there should be one national election day.Cheebs said:Yeah. Iowa/NH double win = national win mainly because americans dont like voting for "losers". Having a few states do it early make america follow their lead. We are like sheep in that way.
It should be but Iowa and NH will fight it like mad. Tradition might be so entrenched that it may be hard to break free.Souldriver said:Uh, then I agree with Triumph that there should be one national election day.
No wai! Realistically, he's probably screwed because [cynicism]I can't seriously believe some random nutjob somewhere won't shoot him, sadly[/cynicism] but how would we be worse off with President Obama than what we've had?Mercury Fred said:Fuck Obama. We're so screwed if he gets the nomination.
So that's why you love Halo 3...Y2Kev said:This "change" thing is getting annoying. I'm for sameness.
Cheebs said:A college girl fainted this morning cause of Obama's presence. :lol
It's not so much that I think he'd be terrible (though I do think he'd be a one-termer), it's that I think America's racism will come out in full force if he's the nominee and we'll have another Republican in office.Triumph said:No wai! Realistically, he's probably screwed because [cynicism]I can't seriously believe some random nutjob somewhere won't shoot him, sadly[/cynicism] but how would we be worse off with President Obama than what we've had?
Mercury Fred said:Fuck Obama. We're so screwed if he gets the nomination.
How are these all white states voting for him in droves now though? It's not just democrats. But independents as well. He is getting massive support of non-dems in all white states of Iowa and NH so far.Mercury Fred said:It's not so much that I think he'd be terrible (though I do think he'd be a one-termer), it's that I think America's racism will come out in full force if he's the nominee and we'll have another Republican in office.
No, I read about it. He was at a rally this morning at a college and a girl was so over-whelmed by him that she fainted.mckmas8808 said:Was it on camera?
vultureparade said:I have no idea why the hell everyone is so excited about Obama.
Hah, pissing off European nations is always a plus in my book. :lolRiskyChris said:How so? I trust him over Hillary to mend our differences with other nations, and unfortunately they're the only two candidates who look like they know what they're talking about.
I'm much more concerned with starting a trend of politicians who stop pissing off the world -- not just the middle east, but European nations, et al.
It's the South and parts of the Midwest that worry me the most. I hope I'm wrong.Cheebs said:How are these all white states voting for him in droves now though? It's not just democrats. But independents as well. He is getting massive support of non-dems in all white states of Iowa and NH so far.
Mercury Fred said:It's not so much that I think he'd be terrible (though I do think he'd be a one-termer), it's that I think America's racism will come out in full force if he's the nominee and we'll have another Republican in office.
He won't lose the midwest. He is from the midwest (at least for the last 20 or so years). It's his base. He'll probably lose the south, but what democrat wont?Mercury Fred said:It's the South and parts of the Midwest that worry me the most. I hope I'm wrong.
vultureparade said:I have no idea why the hell everyone is so excited about Obama.
Cheebs said:He wont make that argument after tonight. Like many have said no candidate who has won both Iowa and NH has ever lost the nomination ever.
I have no idea why the hell everyone is so excited about Obama.
Mercury Fred said:It's the South and parts of the Midwest that worry me the most. I hope I'm wrong.
Mercury Fred said:It's the South and parts of the Midwest that worry me the most. I hope I'm wrong.
And as for trusting him, I don't trust Obama at all. The McClurkin gaffe soured me to him and revealed that he's certainly not going to hold himself accountable for his mistakes if the media isn't going to hold his feet to the fire. Furthermore, I think he's kind of an empty windbag. Again, I hope I'm wrong. That said, I'm no Clinton fan either. I'm bummed out that Edwards is my default top choice but ultimately, I'll vote for whoever the Democratic nominee is.
Cheebs said:He won't lose the midwest. He is from the midwest (at least for the last 20 or so years). It's his base. He'll probably lose the south, but what democrat wont?
Flo_Evans said:Hillary = HD-DVD
Obama = bluray
GO!!!!
ConfusingJazz said:I would say hill is just dvd, and edwards is hd dvd.
Other things that are pluses in Centuryon's book:Ark-AMN said:Hah, pissing off European nations is always a plus in my book. :lol
harSon said:Obama is DVD seeing as DVD completely obamanates both BluRay and HD DVD.
harSon said:Obama is DVD seeing as DVD completely obamanates both BluRay and HD DVD.
Flo_Evans said:Ron Paul = digital downloads then? :lol
Mercury Fred said:It's the South and parts of the Midwest that worry me the most. I hope I'm wrong.
One of the more extraordinary stories of the Obama campaign has been playing out behind the scenes over the past week as the candidate has been working on a daily basis to try to calm things down in his father's homeland and his grandmother's home, Kenya, where a contested election has led to riots.
On January 1, two days before the Iowa caucuses, Obama left a message for Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. According to Robert Gibbs, Obama's Communications Director, Rice called back "as we were driving from Sioux City to Council Bluffs on January 1. They talked about the situation and Rice asked Obama to tape a Voice of America message calling for calm." Obama taped the message on January 2, after a rally in Davenport, Iowa. He said, in part:
"Despite irregularities in the vote tabulation, now is not the time to throw that strong democracy away. Now is a time for President Kibaki, opposition leader Odinga, and all of Kenyas leaders to call for calm, to come together, and to start a political process to address peacefully the controversies that divide them. Now is the time for this terrible violence to end.
Kenyas long democratic journey has at times been difficult. But at critical moments, Kenyans have chosen unity and progress over division and disaster. The way forward is not through violence it is through democracy, and the rule of law. To all of Kenyas people, I ask you to renew Kenyas democratic tradition, and to seek your dreams in peace."
On January 3, the day of the caucuses, he had a conversation with Bishop Desmond Tutu, who had flown to Nairobi to see if he could begin negotiations with the factions. In the days since his Iowa victory, Obama has had near-daily conversations with the U.S. Ambassador in Kenya or with opposition leader Raila Odinga. As of late this afternoon, before his rally in Rochester, N.H., Obama was trying to reach Kenyan President Kibaki.
I haven't been able to talk to Obama directly about this--he is sort of busy right now--but it does seem noteworthy that, in the midst of the most amazing week of his life, Barack Obama has found the time to do a some diplomatic scut-work. I suspect we'll be seeing a lot of this sort of thing if he wins the nomination and is elected President.
Cheebs said:No, I read about it. He was at a rally this morning at a college and a girl was so over-whelmed by him that she fainted.
ToxicAdam said:I like your reasoning and agree with you to an extent.
Obama kind of reminds me of Reagan, in a way. Someone that can deliver a great speech and speak in feel-good, vague symbolism ... yet not have much substance behind it.
If this truly is the case, than we're in need of a revolution.besada said:I want Obama to win the general election, just so I can watch the bloom of cynicism that will grow in the eyes of the faithful when they realize that anyone can talk about change and virtually no one can make it happen.
besada said:I want Obama to win the general election, just so I can watch the bloom of cynicism that will grow in the eyes of the faithful when they realize that anyone can talk about change and virtually no one can make it happen.
RubxQub said:If this truly is the case, than we're in need of a revolution.
Alien Bob said:McCain is D-VHS?
Ron Paul is cartridges in a digital disc world.PhoenixDark said:Paul is UMD
besada said:I want Obama to win the general election, just so I can watch the bloom of cynicism that will grow in the eyes of the faithful when they realize that anyone can talk about change and virtually no one can make it happen.
BenjaminBirdie said:I don't understand why "substance" inevitably has to refer to some specific policy standing (which Obama incidentally has plenty of). The core of his campaign is to get Americans of all standings to get involved in the process and in their country's progress. And if Iowa, and turnout across New Hampshire is any indication, it's working.
How is that not a campaign of substance? That's almost a revolutionary act of galvanization.
mckmas8808 said:Lincoln made it happen. Franklin D. Roosevelt made it happen, Bill Clinton made it happen, Reagan made it happen.
I don't see why change can't happen when there's been proof to show that it has happened plenty of times.
besada said:Neither Bill nor Reagan made any fundamental changes to the system (Well, Reagan made it easier to get corporate money into politics and Bill took complete advantage of that, but neither did a thing to divert the already existing trend of the growing oligarchical plutocracy that the U.S. has become).
Both Lincoln and FDR lived in a very different time, before we defined corporations as people and allowed them entry into the political process under the rubric of free speech.
Sir Alemeth said:Obama is a sexy beast, but waddup with his wife?!? She's butt evil looking![]()
I get that feeling he has some whoop ass in him.besada said:I'd rather have Edwards because he's better trained to tackle the obstacles we face, and is secretly a mean son of a bitch, a trait completely necessary to be an effective Executive.