Official NH Primary Results Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Welp, now it's looking like she's gonna win. Her lead is widening when it should be decreasing.

Sets up an interesting few weeks.
 
Shard said:
Yea, I think you are going to have to deal with that one way or the other.

Eh, Left versus Right I can handle. That's nothing but ideological differences. Left v Left v Left v Left v Right v right v etc, that gets annoying after a while.
 
If Hillary wins NH she would destroy Barack on Feb 5th. She would get her national lead back immediately.

I don't think she'll win NH though.
 
I think Obama will pull through once all the more liberal precincts report. The polls are rarely off by that much, considering they were predicting Obama by 10+%.
 
alr1ghtstart said:
Obama is going to surge. (the darker brown areas have reported)

8ajzcbr.gif
Hmm... Seems plausible:

In the VA/'NY/western New Hampshire market, Obama has aired 1533 ads and Clinton has aired 1132.

The biggest discrepancy is in the Maine/eastern New Hampshire market, where Clinton has aired three times as many ads as Obama: 1446 to 530.
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/
 
Start reporting you fucking Obama-lander precincts...

GOD
 
Amir0x said:
I honestly think a loss for Barack would be WAAAY worse than a loss for Hillary. It'd effectively kill the media's perception of his "GREAT HOPE" tidal wave, leading to the idea that Hillary is still the most dangerous candidate. That'd really kill someone like Obama, who voters want to be sure can win

i doubt it. not only is he still second, but he's gonna own her in South Carolina. John Edwards is who should be really worried. he's already lost twice in a row.
 
Why does everyone say Hillary and not Clinton? I always referred to Bush as 'Dubya' in '00 and '04. Point being, referring to a candidate by anything but their last name is typically a petty sort of way to try and reduce them.

In her case, though, everyone does it. It happens in neutral discourse, and her detractors and supporters all seem to do it. Hell, I do it. But...why?
 
Killthee said:
No, thats a caucus, NH has a primary election.
You know still cracks me up . . . hardly anyone in the USA understands how a caucus works (including me) but that is the system the USA wanted the Iraqis to use for their first election. Who was the genius who came up with that plan?!? :lol
 
jett said:
There's no way the gallup polls and shit miscalculated by that much, Obama has got to win.
Remember the networks have exit polls.
They have more data than they're showing and they're calling it a very close race, there is no reason to doubt it.
 
VistraNorrez said:
Are the attitudes of any presidental candidate fans turn ons?

I just find the disconnect between what he says and the way some people on this board speak to be quite a disconnect.

Not to mention you have very few people attacking Obama with the language that some of you people use on Hillary. But whatever.
 
jett said:
There's no way the gallup polls and shit miscalculated by that much, Obama has got to win.

They include independents, which I believe in NH can vote for either party.

They had to make a choice "SHould I vote for Obama in dem, or vote for ? (McCain?) in Rep?"

Apparently, they decided its more important to vote in the republican race
 
jett said:
There's no way the gallup polls and shit miscalculated by that much, Obama has got to win.
Agreed. The polls had a double digit lead for Obama. That's just too much to have Clinton > Obama in the end.
 
echoshifting said:
Why does everyone say Hillary and not Clinton? I always referred to Bush as 'Dubya' in '00 and '04. Point being, referring to a candidate by anything but their last name is typically a petty sort of way to try and reduce them.

In her case, though, everyone does it. It happens in neutral discourse, and her detractors and supporters all seem to do it. Hell, I do it. But...why?

I call her Hillary merely as a reflex - to distinguish from her husband.
 
Cheebs said:
Iowa never had her increase her lead during the results just to note.

Even if she wins her campaign has been damaged, with the whole "but I wanna make a difference wah cry cry cry" and Bill's Obama outburst, it would be interesting if the Clintons can drag Obama into a mud-slinging contest.
 
VALIS said:
Welp, now it's looking like she's gonna win. Her lead is widening when it should be decreasing.

Sets up an interesting few weeks.


So few precincts reporting I believe its way too early to say that.
 
jamesinclair said:
They include independents, which I believe in NH can vote for either party.

They had to make a choice "SHould I vote for Obama in dem, or vote for ? (McCain?) in Rep?"

Apparently, they decided its more important to vote in the republican race

That's a good point, McCain is big amongst independent voters.
 
Kittonwy said:
Even if she wins her campaign has been damaged, with the whole "but I wanna make a difference wah cry cry cry" and Bill's Obama outburst, it would be interesting if the Clintons can drag Obama into a mud-slinging contest.

He should ask what her views on adultery are.
 
Souldriver said:
That's how statistics work.
35.4 --> 35
39.9 --> 40

No, this was from earlier when it was:

35.9X%
39.2X%

That doesn't round to 35% and 40% respectively. It should be 36% and 39%. Anyway, that's old data now.
 
ivysaur12 said:
CRAP, Hillary is winning in Manchester, and overall by exactly 2,000 votes. CRAP.

Surely Manchester is not fully reported yet. I don't believe she can win Manchester.
 
Tamanon said:
That's a good point, McCain is big amongst independent voters.
CNN just showed that independents broke for McCain and "conservative" voters voted Romney.

Pretty sure. Or flip that.
 
avaya said:
Surely Manchester is not fully reported yet. I don't believe she can win Manchester.

No, it was supposedly early.

It's been hovering around 2,000 votes right now... hmm...

And is it wrong to think that Anderson Cooper is sexy as hell?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom