Didn't know that. Only the legendary FOX News and it's super awesome presenters like O'Reilly and Hannity reached fame on the other side of the atlantic Ocean.grandjedi6 said:MSNBC has always been known to be liberal biased
speculawyer said:Fred Thompson was quite the flop, eh?
APF said:GAFfers are incredibly partisan, or at least extremely-polarized against a good portion of the US electorate. How does that jibe with the fact that so many are Obama fanboys because he's allegedly a less-polarizing figure who will bring the electorate together? Is it the idea that Obama is soo dreamy he'll convince people over to the far left? Yet Obama is to the right of Hillary on many issues, and inconsistent-at-best when it comes to his positioning on allegedly-important areas like foreign policy. No, there doesn't really seem to be any substance behind this line of argumentation.
:lolAdmiralViscen said:Pretty good numbers for a guy who died a month ago.
APF said:GAFfers are incredibly partisan, or at least extremely-polarized against a good portion of the US electorate. How does that jibe with the fact that so many are Obama fanboys because he's allegedly a less-polarizing figure who will bring the electorate together? Is it the idea that Obama is soo dreamy he'll convince people over to the far left? Yet Obama is to the right of Hillary on many issues, and inconsistent-at-best when it comes to his positioning on allegedly-important areas like foreign policy. No, there doesn't really seem to be any substance behind this line of argumentation.
icarus-daedelus said:OK, I'm not gone. But I'm curious: I always thought Fred Thompson was kind of a joke. Did he seriously have a chance or something?
Dreamfixx said:There is a positive side to Hillary taking the nom in February. Means I can all concentrate on school and my job as I will have absolutely NO emotional investment in this race.
perfectchaos007 said:39% Hil
36% Barack
nailed itAPF said:GAFfers are incredibly partisan, or at least extremely-polarized against a good portion of the US electorate. How does that jibe with the fact that so many are Obama fanboys because he's allegedly a less-polarizing figure who will bring the electorate together? Is it the idea that Obama is soo dreamy he'll convince people over to the far left? Yet Obama is to the right of Hillary on many issues, and inconsistent-at-best when it comes to his positioning on allegedly-important areas like foreign policy. No, there doesn't really seem to be any substance behind this line of argumentation.
Before he entered the race many talked him up like he was gonna be the next Reagan.icarus-daedelus said:OK, I'm not gone. But I'm curious: I always thought Fred Thompson was kind of a joke. Did he seriously have a chance or something?
Sure; I'd argue that the internet in general encourages group-polarization. Yet many here argue the "less divisive" position nonetheless.Shard said:Most of the internet is incredibly partisan, it is hardly unique to Neo GAF.
If Hill is nom that means we get republicans for 08Amir0x said:It'd mean I have an even larger emotional investment in the race, since if Hillary gets the nod and looks to win it means an even further degradation of the country.
APF said:GAFfers are incredibly partisan, or at least extremely-polarized against a good portion of the US electorate. How does that jibe with the fact that so many are Obama fanboys because he's allegedly a less-polarizing figure who will bring the electorate together? Is it the idea that Obama is soo dreamy he'll convince people over to the far left? Yet Obama is to the right of Hillary on many issues, and inconsistent-at-best when it comes to his positioning on allegedly-important areas like foreign policy. No, there doesn't really seem to be any substance behind this line of argumentation.
PhoenixDark said:CLINTON 39%
Obama 37%
Edwards 30%
APF said:GAFfers are incredibly partisan, or at least extremely-polarized against a good portion of the US electorate. How does that jibe with the fact that so many are Obama fanboys because he's allegedly a less-polarizing figure who will bring the electorate together? Is it the idea that Obama is soo dreamy he'll convince people over to the far left? Yet Obama is to the right of Hillary on many issues, and inconsistent-at-best when it comes to his positioning on allegedly-important areas like foreign policy. No, there doesn't really seem to be any substance behind this line of argumentation.
tetsuoxb said:I'm a moderate Republican... I have strong intentions of voting for Obama if he makes it to the general election, but if Hillary gets the nod, I'd vote for anyone that looks like they could beat her.
kassatsu said:Did Ron Paul throw in the towel yet, or does the internet get 500 delegates?
GDJustin said:I'm in exactly the same situation.
Oh ffs, it's just people blowing off some steam. Get off your high horse.Stoney Mason said:What I like is that within this thread the Obama fans are the nastiest and most polarizing. Not exactly following his lead as I mentioned early.
PhoenixDark said:Told ya
Grecco said:Am i the only one enjoying this race in NH?
Yes, but your prediction also shows a total of 106% of votes. :lolPhoenixDark said:Told ya
Zozz said:If Hill is nom that means we get republicans for 08
Piper Az said:yeah, i'm done. i hope obama wins!
edit: NH loves how Washinton currently works. They hate change.
JohnTinker said:McCain won in NH in 2000 too, but we all know how that panned out.
Edwards needs to drop outAbsinthe said:South Carolina is going to be fucking interesting. I think it's going to be pretty tight between Edwards-Clinton-Obama.
Both parties are an absolute clusterfuck.
You guys sorely underestimate Hillary and Bill. Much like GAF did before the night began.Ether_Snake said:It's gonna be 2000 all over again.
Justin Bailey said:Oh ffs, it's just people blowing off some steam. Get off your high horse.